You wrote:
>>If a aluminium cylinder filled will gas and people can punch a hole through 3
>>reinforced concrete walls
why would the Pentagon need to develop bunker busters<<
Your logic displays the common logical fallacy known as a non sequitur. What do
aluminum cyllinders carrying thousands of gallons of jet fuel smashing at over
600 mph and smashing into a ground-level building have to do with bunker
busters, designed for deep earth penetration?
With your logic, why would a small piece of lead fired from a weapon put a hole
in anything?
And sad to say, your lack of logical analysis doesn't entitle me to any of your
juvennile accusations. The differences in our credibility is visible to all.
Ben Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ya
thats what I figured
If someone gets to this point in life
and sees invisable airplanes
there is no hope for them
There was no airplabe that hit the pentagon
thats a fact albert
and you and the invisible thousands are either fools , or liars or agents of
the NWO
every shred of evidence PROVES no plane hit
so take your pick Al fool. liar or NWO stooge
at any rate
nothing you say has any credibility
and is a waste of time
you are useless
ps
my final proof
If a aluminium cylinder filled will gas and people can punch a hole through 3
reinforced concrete walls
why would the Pentagon need to develop bunker busters
you are an idiot
Albert Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As you seem unable to follow the logic of the
conversation, the EVENT I referred to was the plane hitting the pent-a-gone.
You seem to think that if you didn't see it on CBS, it didn't happen.
Using your logic, I can assume that you would argue that no plane crashed at
Lockerbie, either.
Your logic points up the significance of the impact of the lack of news
coverage in the US.
Ben Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What event?
another propagandist
telling lies
What event was seen by thousands???
and if there were thousands, why is the videos kept locked away?
Thousands were mind controlled
and you are a liar
Albert Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You seem to miss the obvious fact that the
pentagon is located at the intersection of a number of very busy highways -- a
traffic mess called the 'mixing bowl' in the DC area -- and that thousands of
people saw the event.
John Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From another poster, this was included in several links
It is the report by CNN the afternoon of Sept 11, 2001.
This was shown ONCE, then PULLED by CNN.
"NO EVIDENCE OF A PLANE HAVING HIT THE PENTAGON"
See it yourself. For you Bush 911 Report supporters, watch it and THEN call
the doubters "conspiracy theorists"
http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.tv/altnews.php
--
"... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is
their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide
new Guards for their future security."
***U.S. Declaration of Independence***
---------------------------------
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Keep the faith
BAN
Reasearch stuff an stuff
BaNoyes.tripod.com
---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
---------------------------------
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
Keep the faith
BAN
Reasearch stuff an stuff
BaNoyes.tripod.com
---------------------------------
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.
---------------------------------
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
