Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Prof. Peter Dale Scott publishes: "9/11 Commission Deception, Cheney's Actions on 9/11, and Why He Should Testify Under Oath" via 911Blogger.com - Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alternative News by ProfJones on 9/26/07 Professor Peter Dale Scott has written an insightful and provocative paper, published today in the Journal of 9/11 Studies. Excerpts from the paper:
"The 9/11 Commission Report is an example of concerted cover-up, partly by omissions, and just as importantly by its cherry-picking of evidence to create impressions that are in fact authoritatively disputed, and in some cases probably not true. There are many examples of cherry-picking and contrived simulations of fact. More importantly, there is a consistent pattern in this: to minimize Cheney's responsibility for what happened that day." "In this presentation I have focused on anomalies in the behavior, especially on 9/11, of Richard Cheney. He, and Donald Rumsfeld and others, should testify, under oath, about 1) The June 1 JCS Order requiring highest-level approvals for intercepts of off-course planes, 2) The contested time of Cheney's arrival in the Presidential bunker, 3) Cheney's orders with respect to a plane approaching Washington, and did this occur around 9:27 AM (as testified to by Mineta), or 10:15 AM (as per the 9/11 Report)? Vote ResultScore: 10.0, Votes: 8 read more Things you can do from here: - Visit the original item on 911Blogger.com - Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alternative News - Subscribe to 911Blogger.com - Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alternative News using Google Reader - Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites
