A web site paid for by the Alaska Democratic Party says unequivocally
that “the state of Alaska officially abandoned” the Bridge to Nowhere
project, and credits Governor Sarah Palin.

Or ... it used to say that, before the page mysteriously vanished
(http://www.retireted.com/real-estate/gravina-bridge/ted-earmarked-
funds-for-bridge-that-goes-nowhere/) sometime during the past few
days.

Here’s the Google cache from September 4th: Retire Ted Stevens » Blog
Archive » Ted Earmarked Funds for Bridge that Goes Nowhere. -
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:szpJxaSZwiMJ:www.retireted.com/real-estate/gravina-bridge/ted-earmarked-funds-for-bridge-that-goes-nowhere/+

And here’s the text that they consigned to the memory hole, because
it’s embarrassingly off message:

    Ted Earmarked Funds for Bridge that Goes Nowhere

    * Stevens championed proposed bridge near Ketchikan that became
national symbol of wasteful spending

    * Sen. Murkowski’s family would benefit personally from the bridge

    * State of Alaska killed bridge

    The proposed Gravina Island Bridge, also known as the “Bridge to
Nowhere,” became a national symbol of wasteful congressional spending
and driver of earmark reform. On Sept. 21, 2007, the State of Alaska
officially abandoned the controversial project.

    The Gravina Island Bridge initially received $223 million in 2005
via earmarks by Alaska Senators Ted Stevens and Lisa Murkowski. The
bridge would have connected Ketchikan, Alaska with its local airport
on nearby Gravina Island (population 50). Congress stripped the
earmark after a national uproar about it but appropriated the money
anyway for unspecified transportation uses. Former Gov. Frank
Murkowski’s administration set aside about $113 million of the
appropriation for the Ketchikan bridge. However, Gov. Sarah Palin said
the $398 million bridge was $329 million short of full funding, and
only $36 million in federal funds were set aside for it. She said it
was clear Congress had little interest in spending any more money for
it and that the state had higher priorities.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to