Hysterical people don't realize they are being hysterical. You are a
perfect example of this.

Liberal, at least as it has evolved in this country, means a person
who's intellect is dominated by their emotions.

Being a Carter apologist has no future in it. Did you notice the Dems
didn't let that old boob say a single word at their convention? Why?
Because he's the worst ever and even they know it.

A shiek gives some money to his son in 1996 and this was supposed to
keep people from doing business with his many companies?

Jimmy Carter giving speeches over seas questioning the motives of the
US, WHILE we are at war, makes him a piece of shit. His constant anti-
semetic trashing of Israel, which caused numerous members of his
"think tank" to resign, makes him a piece of shit. Add this to the
disaster he wrought upon this country during his 4 year, which seemed
like ten year term and you get a huge steaming pile of dog shit named
Jimmy. Having him at the helm was physically painful to Americans.

On Sep 10, 1:40 pm, CFTMEDITOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wasn't being hysterical, but you obviously are. I love how you bash
> anyone who you don't agree with as a liberal.
>
> Liberal means free man and free thinker, try excercising some free
> thought some time, you might actually realize how blind and deluded
> you are.
>
> Bush has clearly surpassed Carter as worst president ever and history
> will keep recording that fact even if you try to deny it.
>
> I was not talking about Osama, but there is a paper trail leading
> right back to the Bin Laden family and some of the money and profits
> from Harkin Energy have been directly traced to a bank account that
> Sheikh Bin Laden set up to help Osama in 1996.
>
> Yeah, I really think you are crazy.
>
> Jimmy Carter making Habitat for Humanity a huge agency that is
> providing homes for the survivors of Katrina and poor people all over
> the country equals piece of shit legacy?
>
> There are literally tens of thousands of people who have homes now who
> would be living on the streets if not for Jimmy Carter's advocacy and
> constant exposure in the public eye of Habitat For Humanity.
>
> And going to Africa and devastated third world countries and providing
> aid and food also equals piece of shit?
> Saving lives and helping raise money for famine and tsunami victims
> makes him a piece of shit?
>
> The only piece of shit I see is the one on your face from you sticking
> it up your ass.
>
> Bush is the worst president and that is according to every polling
> group and news agency in existence.
>
> End of story, he is the worst piece of shit to ever wash up in the
> White House, Carter only had four years, but Bush has had eight long
> and painful years to make his place in history as one of the most
> reviled and hated people on earth.
>
> You are a disgrace.
> On Sep 10, 1:22 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The problem with you hyper-emotional libs is that you think your
> > hysteria equals logic. Bin-laden's family is not guilty of Osama's
> > crimes. And having done business with one of their vast holding
> > companies does not mean you're in league with Osama or that the bin
> > Ladens are coming over for Thanksgiving.
>
> > And I don't know if you're just to young or just too stupid to
> > understand that Jimmy Carter was the worst fucking President in living
> > memory. And as hard as it is to believe, he is taking the piece of
> > shit he left as his legacy and making it WORSE as an ex-President.
>
> > Do you believe the government blew up the World Trade Center too,
> > bunky?
>
> > On Sep 10, 1:06 pm, CFTMEDITOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, it's really conspiracy when Fox News even reports it.
>
> > > You try to hide anything you don't want to hear by calling it
> > > conspiracy.
>
> > > Fox News and several other major news agencies have documented the
> > > long history and monetary ties to Bush and the Bin Ladens.
>
> > > It is public record that George H.W. Bush sits on the board of Carlyle
> > > Group with several of the Bin Ladens.
>
> > > But that'sokay, i expect that from the blind and ardent Bush
> > > supporters.
>
> > > They keep the farce alvie by still being able to overlook all the
> > > corruption, greed and scandal connected to the name Bush.
>
> > > Worst President EVER! Lowest approval ratings in history.
>
> > > But I suppose that's conspiracy theory too?
>
> > > When a right wing web site published rumors and allegations it quickly
> > > becomes fact in the Republican world, but when any other website or
> > > news aganecy publishes or exposes lies and deciet connected to the
> > > Republicans and Bush they all call it conspiracy and slander.
>
> > > On Sep 10, 12:48 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > You spend too much time on conspiracy theory web sites.
>
> > > > On Sep 10, 12:15 pm, CFTMEDITOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Mark you are such a wuss I am still amazed everytime you type out a
> > > > > stupid reply that doesn't even have a whit of common sense or make any
> > > > > real defense of your shallow and blind faith beliefs.
>
> > > > > Every time someone gives you a good solid arguement in response to
> > > > > your idiocy you either reply with an attack based on nothing to do
> > > > > with the pervious post or you bash the person for being a liberal.
>
> > > > > So far I have never seen you respond in any manner that would make me
> > > > > believe you had the slightest clue that you were able to engage in
> > > > > intelligent discourse or that you have more than two brain cells.
>
> > > > > One to type and one to help you maintain your mouth breathing. Oopps,
> > > > > guess I figured out why you can't really have an intellignent
> > > > > discourse.
>
> > > > > You rely on attacks without substance. Grow a brain and use it man.
>
> > > > > Oh, did I too many big words for you to figure out and then post some
> > > > > coherent responses.
>
> > > > > Here's a good online dictionary.http://www.merriam-webster.com/
>
> > > > > I also think you are afraid to discuss the whole Bin Laden-Bush
> > > > > connection.
>
> > > > > It's by now been firmly established the Poppy Bush was sitting in the
> > > > > same room with them on 9/11.
>
> > > > > And Sheik Bin Laden directly funded W Bush with cash and influence in
> > > > > the oil business.
>
> > > > > "The Senate Commitee on BCCI, the Kerry Committee, noted that Ed
> > > > > Rogers, the White House political director, was hired directly away by
> > > > > the BCCI sheikh and paid, along with a hitherto unknown assistant
> > > > > named Haley Barbour (later to become National Republican Committee
> > > > > Chairman), the sum of $600,000 to not do much of nothing. The Senate
> > > > > Committee concluded that it, along with the "gifts" of cash to GW
> > > > > Bush, was intended to influence President Bush.
>
> > > > > After GW Bush's company, Arbrusto, went bust, the bin Laden connection
> > > > > with BCCI went to work once again to prop up the president's son and
> > > > > to buy influence. GW swapped out shares until he had an interest in a
> > > > > new company, Harken Energy, which quickly received a lucrative oil
> > > > > concession in Bahrain. An "extraordinary number of people connected to
> > > > > Harken or the oil deal have ties to BCCI... Sheikh Khalifa bin-Salman
> > > > > al-Khalifa helped to ensure that Harken was awarded the offshore
> > > > > drilling contract... Sheikh Abdullah Taha Baksh..Ghairth Pharaon...
> > > > > Bin Mahfouz... Talat Othman who has visited the White House..."
>
> > > > > from False Profits, page 370.
>
> > > > > Oh my Mark, will you reply to this or continue to attack like a
> > > > > blinded right wing nut that you are?
>
> > > > > This whole bullshit of how they want Obama more than McCain is a bunch
> > > > > of half truths and false rumors that the repubs lovwe to try to pass
> > > > > off as truth.
>
> > > > > On Sep 9, 7:27 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > the muslims were counting on one of their own sitting in the oval
> > > > > > office, turning a blind eye to their uncivilized behavior, and
> > > > > > basically allowing them to run rampant throughout the world.  not 
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > see that ain't gonna happen.
>
> > > > > > On Sep 9, 6:57 pm, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You mean the Saudi Royal family and the Bin Laden family, who are
> > > > > > > very, very close to the Bush family?  Bandar Bush is upset?  That
> > > > > > > makes no sense at all.
>
> > > > > > > Get a clue.  The Bush Family have far more connections to the 
> > > > > > > "Arabs"
> > > > > > > than Obama does.
>
> > > > > > > Why do you think Bush Jr used his presidential powers to allow 
> > > > > > > the Bin
> > > > > > > Laden family in the U.S. to fly around the country after 9/11, 
> > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > American citizens couldn't, collecting all of their Bin Laden
> > > > > > > relatives and their larvae, and get out of America?
>
> > > > > > > Don't you think we might have found out something interesting with
> > > > > > > questioning of the Bin Laden family?  Why did Bush Jr subvert 
> > > > > > > justice?
>
> > > > > > > ----------
>
> > > > > > > On Sep 9, 2:32 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > AMMAN -- With the U.S. presidential elections just two months 
> > > > > > > > away,
> > > > > > > > many Arabs and Muslims are increasingly worried that a victory 
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > another conservative Republican administration will exacerbate 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > tensions and turbulence that have followed the Sept. 11, 2001 
> > > > > > > > attacks
> > > > > > > > on the United States.
>
> > > > > > > > The events and speeches at the Republican Party convention in
> > > > > > > > Minnesota, which endorsed the candidacy of Arizona Senator John 
> > > > > > > > McCain
> > > > > > > > and his running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, were given 
> > > > > > > > special
> > > > > > > > attention in the Arab media, as commentators voiced fears that a
> > > > > > > > McCain administration would pursue, perhaps more belligerently, 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > path of the current government.
>
> > > > > > > > As a rule, Arab governments in the region prefer to refrain from
> > > > > > > > showing their preferences in U.S. elections, but the media, 
> > > > > > > > including
> > > > > > > > the state-controlled TV and press, have made no secret of their 
> > > > > > > > desire
> > > > > > > > to see a new leadership in Washington that is run by Democratic
> > > > > > > > presidential candidate Illinois Senator Barack Obama. 
> > > > > > > > -http://www.metimes.com/International/2008/09/05/mccain-palin_ticket_c...
>
> > > > > > > > That's right, Mr. Moderate Muslim, we ain't finished with you 
> > > > > > > > yet...
> > > > > > > > not by a long shot.
>
> > > > > > > > Hey, Sheiks of Saud, why not drop by Wasilla and try running 
> > > > > > > > that game
> > > > > > > > on Sarah.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to