No Mark I was ALWAYS against the Invasion, and I was demanding a REAL surge years before Bush to fix the FUBAR he created. It was your Ilk that has consistently gotten it wrong.
Read the truth about my position on both the Iraq war and the surge. Both positions were posted BEFORE it became popular to have them. I give the links Mark, now lets see who has the real balls in this group MY POSITION AGAINST THE IRAQ WAR ON FEBRUARY 18,2003! To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:02 PM Subject: One Man's Humble Opinion http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum/web/one-mans-humble-opinion?hl=en War as a cavalier solution should not be taken lightly. We can conquer Iraq quickly. That should not be a problem. We will kill Saddam. That is a given. Now the dangerous part. We will have an occupying army in a US hostile part of the world. We will either be supported or unsupported by our allies. If we are supported the costs to the United States will not be a great and the logistics for war and occupation easier. Without support it will be much more difficult. Our troops will also be exposed to constant danger to ambush. There will be high casualties from this. It will come from many terrorists sources. While we are saber rattling it gave the Iraqis time to slip their own terror cells into our country. Don't kid yourselves, they are here. The President gave them plenty of advance warning. So now we have Iraq, Iran, and Al Qaeda terror cells in the US. The seratin found in England was probably distributed through out the NATO countries and the United States. Upon our attack it will probably be released. While the war is going on it will be expensive to finance. So we will have to issue Treasuries to pay for the expense. The last treasury auction went badly. We had to offer the notes at discount prices. The yields had to be higher so that the bonds would be bought. During this war interest rates for bonds will rise to finance the war. this will cause interest rates for all loans rise. The cost to use money will rise. The recovery will be postponed. The deficit will be a huge burden for years to come. This is not the same scenario as the last Iraq war. This is just the tip of the iceberg. So before you say lets do this and get it over with, just know what the cost of a war could be. I am for defending this country against all threats. I just understand what that actually means. MY POSITION DEMANDING A REAL SURGE ON AUGUST 28, 2005! Sunday, August 28, 2005 The Truth about Liberals, The Iraq 'cut and run' and the Useful Bush Idiot lies. http://vtsl.blogspot.com/2005/08/truth-about-liberals-iraq-cut-and-run.html#links Sheehan speaks the truth when she says her son died in a war based on lies. That Bush has no honor sending our troops to die based on his lies. No one is saying that the troops dying are dying without honor. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Al qaida Attacked the US. NO one is calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops out of Iraq. We invaded and caused the chaos in Iraq because of the poor planning of the Bush Administration. We broke, we own it. To win this war Two things need to happen. Things that would back fire on the Republicans and the Bush Administration. Two things that would save American and Iraqis lives. We need more troops in Iraq and to supply these troops Bush needs to reinstate the draft. Why do we need more troops? To keep the peace in areas AFTER the Marines stomp out the Insurgents in a hot zone. If we do not send in more troops to keep the peace the insurgents merely return once the Marines leave and kill any Iraqis who helped the US. This is not rocket science, but apparently beyond Bush's comprehension. You actually have to be in the military to understand this rational. Even with the reinstatement of the draft US troops will remain in force for another Two years in Iraq. It will take that long for the draftees to make a difference, and for the newly trained Iraqis to replace American troops in pacified areas. This will only work if the Iraqis KNOW the US plans to withdrawal as Iraqis troops replace them and the time table for this is FIRM. This will not happen though, for to do this Bush would have to admit he was wrong in underestimating troop strength in the first place and secondly because a Draft would cause massive protests on US campuses. It will make the Sheehan protest look like a non event. It would also mean the death knell of the Republican's power hold in DC and the epithet to Bush's Administration. OK Bush Believers and Useful bush Idiots, now that you know what the LIBERALS REALLY think, what have you to say? On Sep 11, 12:48 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what's the matter lib, lose some good terrorist friends who we killed > in the surge? sorry to see you raghead terrorist buds losing to the > mighty satan? hate to admit you libs were wrong, again? > > On Sep 11, 11:42 am, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Republicans praise McCain for supporting the Surge, > > I don't get it. Here is why. > > > September 11, 2008 > > Sean Lewis. > > > The surge has worked, for the moment, > > I still remember the premature celebrations > > of the 'mission accomplished' speech. > > > My problem with Republicans celebrating the > > success of the surge and bragging about it > > being such a great idea is this.... > > > How do you celebrate the guy who organized > > the bucket brigade, when he was the one who > > set the barn on fire? > > > Had we not invaded Iraq there would never have > > been a need for the surge. > > > Just a thought.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
