[[So Rangel should step down because of an investigation, so should Palin? ]]
Oh, SNAP. LOL. ---------- On Sep 17, 6:17 am, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So Rangel should step down because of an investigation, > so should Palin? > > Dumb ass. > > The obstructionist Republican Senators are blocking all > change in Congress, but why bring up the truth and facts > when you are trying to make a point. That is clear this is > not how the Republicans function. > > Cheney LIED so we could Invade another Country. > > On Sep 16, 5:05 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Last time I looked the Democrats WERE THE INCUMBENT Congressional > > Party... To Obama "Change in Washington" is limited to the WH AND > > NOT IN CONGRESS... As we all know, our founding fathers divided our > > government into three SEPARATE power centers... > > > One could say Obama is the Status Quo candidate when it comes to the > > Congress... So what about Charlie Rangel Obama??? > > >http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/16/candidates.wall.street/index.html > > > >>> But as the bad economic news continues to grow, Democrats see an > > >>> opening. > > > As CNN's Schneider explained, "It's like an election where nobody > > represents the incumbent party. Everybody's an outsider. Everybody's > > for change. A lot of Democrats are asking, 'How can we let the > > Republicans get away with that?' "- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
