On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > #11 is true. No, it's a myth and a smear, just like everything else you post. She NEVER tried to ban ANY books, nor were any books ever banned; the librarian position in Wasilla serves at the pleasure of the Mayor and since she supported Palin's opponent during the mayoral election, Palin requested her resignation - she ultimately decided to keep her on, and she remained a librarian until she retired mid-way through Palin's second term as mayor. Ok, on the next smear! > > > #12 is true. As governor she spoke at their 2008 convention. That is > supporting the group. Do you think she would have appeared at an > abortion-rights group? No, because she does not support that cause. The AIP is a libertarian-ish party in Alaska that has lots of members, although she was never one herself. Secession is NOT a plank of this party. Palin sent a video to the group wishing them a good convention....that's it. OK, on to the next smear! > > > #13 She is being investigated for abuse of power in her firing of > Monagan because he wouldn't fire Wooten. She has changed her story a > few times along the way, but there is signicant evidence to indicate > she was using her power as governor in a petty, vindictive vendetta > against her sister's ex-husband. And let's put it this way...if there > wasn't significant evidence proving this, Sarah Palin would not be so > desperately destroying evidence and stonewalling the ethics > investigation. There's NO proof whatsoever that she destroyed any evidence, just as there is NO proof whatsover that she fired Monegan for not firing her ex-brother in law. There is a MOUNTAIN of evidence, both in emails, witnesses to conversations and from people involved that Monegan was fired for exactly the reason she said - he was insubodinate. His position was a politically appointed one and serves at the pleasure of the governor, and she doesn't have to explain why she fires political appointees to anyone....but she did and is doing just that and quite openly. She has a right to see an ethics investigation done the way the state law mandates - and that is administratively, not via the legislation which has since been corrupted and polluted by Obama supporters. There's nothing petty and vindictive about firing political appointees who aren't loyal to a newly-elected governor (or president for that matter). This is a sign of leadership and focus - a sign that she is committed to pursuing the platform she ran on, and will not allow those who are only interested in undermining progress to stick around. Next smear, please! Oh wait - that's it? That's all ya got? Debunking you is SO easy! Come on, give me something tough! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
