You always call people ignorant and right after you have shown your
ignorance. I'll use an article from the ultra-conservative Heritage
Foundation to give you what they say are the facts about the Chrysler
bailout. This is from 1983.

1- The truth is that the Chrysler Corporation has gone bankrupt In the
past three years, by every normal definition of the word.

Chrysler has renegotiated its debts and restructured its organization
in a way that greatly resembles a company going through Chapter 11
bankruptcy. Its creditors, like those of bankrupt firms, were forced
to swallow sizeable losses. Chrysler was able to pay off more than
$600 million in debts at just 30 cents on the dollar..

2-Chrysler's creditors are not alone in being socked by the company's
quasi-bankruptcy. The firm's workers have paid an even greater price.
Despite the fact that the loan guarantees were approved by Congress
mainly to protect jobs at Chrysler, the company has sent home nearly
half of its employees, cutting its white collar work force by 20,000
and laying off 42,600 of its hourly workers since the loan guarantees
were signed into law. Many observers, including Senator William
Proxmire (D-Wis complain that the number of employees laid off at
Chrysler in this period is at least as large--and may even have been
larger than the number of jobs that probably would have been lost had
Chrysler actually been forced into bankruptcy.

Chrysler's creditors and employees have paid a price no different than
they would have paid in reorganization under the bankruptcy laws the
workers and creditors who have benefitted from federal generosity, who
has? The answer: Mainly Chrysler's shareholders But not even all of
Chrysler's shareholders benefitted: sensib1e stockholders-the ones who
carefully monitored Chrysler's financial and management performance--
probably sold the stock well before the bailout occurred. Therefore,
only two types of Chrysler stockholders really benefitted 'from 'the
bail-out 1) less informed investors who either ignored the warning
signs of Chrysler's impending bankruptcy or else failed to act on
them, and 2) the stock holders who were gambling that the federal
government would come to Chrysler's rescue and minimize their
potential losses.

3- In early 1980, Chrysler was able to issue government-guaranteed
bonds at an interest rate of only 10.35 percent, while Ford Motor
Company was forced to pay about 14.50 percent for its unguaranteed
bonds. If Chrysler did not have the loan guarantees, it would almost
certainly have to pay a higher interest rate on its bonds than the
more secure Ford Motor Company. Therefore, one would assume that
Chrysler should be paying the federal government a guarantee fee of at
least four percent. Yet Chrysler pays only one percent, or about $12
million a year.

Chrysler attempted to make up the difference by giving the government
14.4 million warrants, which are certificates that give the government
the right to purchase a share of Chrysler stock at $13 a share. Even
if the stock price does rise to the point where American taxpayers
would be fully compensated for the 300 million in interest subsidies
that Chrysler will enjoy during the 1980s, the company is clearly not
eager to see taxpayers collecting on those warrants In early 1983,
Chrysler publicly demanded that the Treasury Department return the
warrants to Chrysler, claiming that cashing in now-valuable warrants
would amount to usury. Due to adverse public reaction, a Chrysler
spokesman said that the company would not press the demand at this
time.

4- Chrysler claims that cost cutting has been an important factor in
the company's success. But Chrys1er's version of cost cutting provides
a shaky foundation for long-term profitability. Examples:  Carry-
forward of tax losses. Chrysler's massive losses in 1979, 1980, and
1981 have given the company large tax deductions to cut its tax bills
almost to zero throughout the 1980s. Of the 170 million earned by
Chrysler in the first quarter of 1983 only half actually represents
operating profit; the other half is attributable to Chrysler's large
loss carry-forward & cuts in research and development (R&D) spending.



On Sep 22, 11:40 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually holy...
>
> It seems the conditions of this "Loan" will be MUCH better than the
> one with Chrysler.
>
> Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding.
>
> On Sep 22, 7:46 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gaar,
>
> > Really? Are you telling me that the terms and conditions of this
> > "loan" are EXACTLY the same as the terms and conditions of the "loan"
> > given to Chrysler over 20 yeras ago? Is that the stance you wish to
> > take?
>
> > On Sep 22, 6:25 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > And when Chrysler "scored" $1.5 Billion, way back when, they not only
> > > repaid the Loans, with Interest, but the Warrants they Issued the
> > > Government were also later sold and they made an additional $400
> > > Million, or 26%+ of the Loan amount.
>
> > > Those who fail to Learn their History...
>
> > > On Sep 22, 2:59 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Philo,
>
> > > > And corporate America just scored $700 billion of the tax-payer's
> > > > money.
>
> > > > On Sep 22, 4:30 pm, Philobealo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > >    Suckling at the government teat for their entire lives, libs drain
> > > > > and drain our economy to the point where they have now broken the
> > > > > banking system. IF there's gonna be a bailout, I want to make sure
> > > > > that the government TAKES those foreclosures from brokeback, broke-ass
> > > > > libs and kicks them out on the street where they belong.- Hide quoted 
> > > > > text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to