When pro-choice social commentator Camille Paglia wrote that she
sanctions "murder" when it is called "abortion," pro-lifers were
horrified. They should have cheered.

Her article -- published recently on Salon.com-- only briefly touched
on abortion. But the offending comments were made as part of an
attention- grabbing one-two punch. Paglia wrote that she is "a firm
supporter of abortion rights," but then went on to say: "I have always
frankly admitted that abortion is murder, the extermination of the
powerless by the powerful … which results in the annihilation of
concrete individuals and not just clumps of insensate tissue." Almost
every pro-abortion activist lives in a zone where they conceal what
abortion really is -- though they know that the procedure involves
killing a person each and every time. The difference between them and
Paglia is that they don't come out and say it.

For the average Canadian, the whole issue has long been obscured by
euphemistic language. "I believe in a woman's right to choose" is the
standard eight-word refrain. We can thank Paglia for unpacking that
sentence. The "choice" involves choosing the annihilation of concrete
individuals at the hands of the powerful. (One pictures an innocent
serf being dragged to the gallows under a medieval prince.) The
"right" claimed is an absolute authority over another person's body.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/09/23/andrea-mrozek-abortion-in-plain-english.aspx
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to