From: Travis
Subject: What do Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Barack Obama have in common?
Gaffney
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008,


http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1262/pub_detail.asp

September 24, 2008
A World without America

   - Print This
   - E-mail This

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id./author_detail.asp>Frank
Gaffney
 Q. What do Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Barack Obama have in common?

A. The president of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democrat candidate
for president of the United States of America have both chosen to spend much
of their lives in the company of people who are virulently hostile to this
country. At least some of them seek to bring about, as Ahmadinejad puts it,
a "world without America."

As it happens, Ahmadinejad was given a platform yesterday for his
anti-American invective by the United Nations. That organization
increasingly not only shares a generalized transnational ambition to
transform a sovereign, powerful United States in favor of one-world
government. Worse yet, thanks to the growing petro-wealth and aggressiveness
of the leaders of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the UN
is actually starting to accommodate itself to that bloc's ambition to have
the new world order be arranged according to the totalitarian program the
Iranian and other Islamists' call Shariah.

In the early days of the Iranian revolution, Ahmadinejad was a street thug
(and, according to some Americans taken hostage in the U.S. embassy in
Tehran, one of their tormentors) in the service of the radical Shiite
Islamist, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Ever since, he has been rewarded for
his loyalty to the most intolerant strains of Islam and for his hostility to
the "Great Satan."

Today, that service continues as the front-man for the current ruling
theocracy, led by another radical cleric, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The
Iranian regime is not content with having Mahmoud Ahmadinejad touting
repeatedly its determination to bring about a world without America – and,
by the way, without Israel, either. It is acting to acquire the capability
to fulfill these genocidal threats with the development and deployment of
the means of launching unimaginably destructive nuclear attacks against
these nations.

Is that possible? Unfortunately, given Israel's small size and concentrated
population, a single weapon could effectively achieve Ahmadinejad's stated
goal of "wiping Israel off the map." Less well understood is the fact that,
according to a congressional commission, a single nuclear weapon used to
unleash a devastating electro-magnetic pulse via a nuclear detonation in
space, could cause "catastrophic" damage to this country, too. By some
estimates, were the electrical grid to be taken down for a very long time,
nine out of ten Americans would be unable to survive. A world without
America, indeed.

Thankfully, the friends of Barack Obama who have exhibited their own, rabid
hostility toward this country have had more modest ambitions towards
"changing" this country – or at least not been in a position to act on
Iranian-style apocalyptic visions. It is now common knowledge, however, that
his pastor for 20 years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, called on God to "damn
America" and that one of Obama's early political allies, convicted terrorist
William Ayers, expressed regret that he was unable to "do enough" when it
came to "setting bombs."

Before Messrs. Wright and Ayers, though, there was "Frank," the name Obama
gives in his memoirs to a man he describes as a formative influence during
his early years in Hawaii. It turns out this Frank was none other than Frank
Marshall Davis, a Stalinist black Communist whom the inestimably valuable Cliff
Kincaid <http://www.usasurvival.org/> has identified as a "high-level
operative in a Soviet-sponsored network in Hawaii," which "the communists
had targeted…largely because of its strategic location and importance to the
U.S. defense effort." Kincaid describes Davis as a "propagandist, racial
agitator and recruiter for the Communist Party of the USA." He reports that,
during the 19 years Davis was under FBI surveillance, Obama's mentor "spent
much of his time" photographing Hawaii's shorelines and beachfronts –
presumably not for their scenic value.

Last, but not least, there is increasing evidence of Obama's long-standing
ties to two others with records of hostility towards this country. According
to investigative reporter Kenneth
Timmerman<http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama_sutton_saudi/2008/09/03/127490.html>,
the first is Khalid al-Mansour (a.k.a. Don Warden), once a prominent
advocate for racist black nationalism. Since his conversion to Islam,
al-Mansour has worked closely with a Saudi billionaire anxious to "exert
influence in the United States," Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.   It will be
recalled that the latter was the Wahhabi whose largesse then-New York Mayor
Rudy Giuliani famously spurned after 9/11 upon learning the Saudi royal had
blamed American policies for that day's horrific attack. Obama reportedly
benefited from these Islamists' help in securing a position at Harvard Law
School – a university that now has a $20 million center named for the prince
that helps legitimate the seditious practice of Shariah in America.

We know that Barack Obama has, in the past, declared his willingness to meet
with the leaders of Iran without precondition. While he has subsequently
qualified that commitment, it seems fair to conclude that, given what they
have in common, the Democrat candidate would feel unencumbered by a
reluctance to dignify – to say nothing of encourage – so vociferous a
proponent of anti-Americanism as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

It is clear what kind of "change" the Iranian president believes in and that
which has animated several of Barack Obama's long-time friends. This week's
presidential debate may afford an opportunity to determine to what extent
change inimical to America is also what the Democrat candidate believes in.

*FamilySecurityMatters.org  <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/>Contributor
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. is President of the Center for Security Policy and a
columnist for the *Washington Times*.*
**








-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to