load of crap

On Sep 25, 5:12 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Predatory Lenders' Partner in CrimeHow the Bush Administration Stopped
> the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers
> ยป
> By Eliot Spitzer
> Thursday, February 14, 2008; Page A25
>
> Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in
> consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of
> predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were
> misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to
> consumers' ability to repay, making loans with deceptive "teaser"
> rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with
> undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These
> and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on
> home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if
> left unchecked, threatened our financial markets.
>
> Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the
> Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect
> American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align
> itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers.
>
> Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national
> crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I
> joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill
> the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together,
> state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered
> into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in
> predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New
> York's, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.
>
> What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course
> and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As
> Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of
> homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a
> resounding no.
>
> Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers,
> it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent
> states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which
> the federal government was turning a blind eye.
>
> Let me explain: The administration accomplished this feat through an
> obscure federal agency called the Office of the Comptroller of the
> Currency (OCC). The OCC has been in existence since the Civil War. Its
> mission is to ensure the fiscal soundness of national banks. For 140
> years, the OCC examined the books of national banks to make sure they
> were balanced, an important but uncontroversial function. But a few
> years ago, for the first time in its history, the OCC was used as a
> tool against consumers.
>
> In 2003, during the height of the predatory lending crisis, the OCC
> invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to issue formal
> opinions preempting all state predatory lending laws, thereby
> rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules that
> prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection
> laws against national banks. The federal government's actions were so
> egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general,
> and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new
> rules.
>
> But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even
> slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In
> fact, when my office opened an investigation of possible
> discrimination in mortgage lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed
> a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation.
>
> Throughout our battles with the OCC and the banks, the mantra of the
> banks and their defenders was that efforts to curb predatory lending
> would deny access to credit to the very consumers the states were
> trying to protect. But the curbs we sought on predatory and unfair
> lending would have in no way jeopardized access to the legitimate
> credit market for appropriately priced loans. Instead, they would have
> stopped the scourge of predatory lending practices that have resulted
> in countless thousands of consumers losing their homes and put our
> economy in a precarious position.
>
> When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and
> recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent
> homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The
> tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged
> as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in
> their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power
> of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state
> legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on
> the side of consumers.
>
> The writer is governor of New York.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to