so I guess it is safe to say you are unable to provide scientific
proof.  case closed, you lose.  say good nite.  how does it feel to
support the murder of 40+ million children, murky?  make ya feel
proud?  make ya feel all tingly inside?

On Sep 25, 6:54 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> of course it is !
>
> On Sep 25, 6:50 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a dictionary definition is not scientific proof, murky.  what part of
> > scientific do you not understand.  look it up in your dictionary, and
> > then get back with some undeniable, irrefutable SCIENTIFIC proof as to
> > when life begins.
>
> > On Sep 25, 6:36 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i already did just that can't you read ?
> > > American Heritage Dictionary - [ life. The interval of time between
> > > birth and death: ]
> > > On Sep 25, 6:23 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > that is not scientific proof murky.  where is the SCIENTIFIC proof?
> > > > provide a link to your scientific proof.  can't do it can ya?  didn't
> > > > think so.  putz
>
> > > > On Sep 25, 6:18 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > American Heritage Dictionary - life.
> > > > > [ The interval of time between birth and death: She led a good, long
> > > > > life. ]
>
> > > > > On Sep 25, 6:03 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > ya know murky, you keep claiming that life does not begin till 
> > > > > > birth,
> > > > > > and yet you have never been able to provide one iota of scientific
> > > > > > proof to back up your claim.  so either put up, or shut up.
>
> > > > > > On Sep 25, 3:10 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > you can not murder what isn't alive !
>
> > > > > > > On Sep 24, 8:56 am, frankg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Right on queue, Mike proves Camille Paglia's correct. Put your 
> > > > > > > > head in
> > > > > > > > the sand, pretend the fetus is nothing more than a clump of 
> > > > > > > > insensate
> > > > > > > > tissue and bingo, it's choice, not murder.
>
> > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 7:32 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > you are correct that is what she says on the last page of her
> > > > > > > > > article . but as life begins at birth! and  not even one 
> > > > > > > > > second before
> > > > > > > > > that she is obviously mistaken in her believes . you can not 
> > > > > > > > > murder
> > > > > > > > > what isn't alive and a fetus is not alive period !
>
> > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 7:13 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > pay attention, dumb shit.  go to SALON.COM  go to the 
> > > > > > > > > > article she
> > > > > > > > > > wrote titled FRESH BLOOD FOR A VAMPIRE.  go to page 4 of 
> > > > > > > > > > her article
> > > > > > > > > > that she wrote titled FRESH BLOOD FOR A VAMPIRE at 
> > > > > > > > > > SALON.COM.  read
> > > > > > > > > > it, it is right there in black and white.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 7:07 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > no mark that is an article claiming she said this . where 
> > > > > > > > > > > is the
> > > > > > > > > > > article she was supposed to have written ?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 7:05 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > go to salon.com  bring up her article called Fresh 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Blood for a
> > > > > > > > > > > > Vampire.  go to page 4 and read it and weep
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 6:54 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > where is the article referenced in this propaganda 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > piece of yours ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a check of Camille Paglia shows she wrote no such 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > article !
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 24, 6:34 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > When pro-choice social commentator Camille Paglia 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote that she
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sanctions "murder" when it is called "abortion," 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > pro-lifers were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > horrified. They should have cheered.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Her article -- published recently on Salon.com-- 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > only briefly touched
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on abortion. But the offending comments were made 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as part of an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attention- grabbing one-two punch. Paglia wrote 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that she is "a firm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > supporter of abortion rights," but then went on to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > say: "I have always
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > frankly admitted that abortion is murder, the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > extermination of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerless by the powerful … which results in the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > annihilation of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > concrete individuals and not just clumps of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > insensate tissue." Almost
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > every pro-abortion activist lives in a zone where 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > they conceal what
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > abortion really is -- though they know that the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > procedure involves
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > killing a person each and every time. The 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > difference between them and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paglia is that they don't come out and say it.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the average Canadian, the whole issue has long 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > been obscured by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > euphemistic language. "I believe in a woman's right 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to choose" is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > standard eight-word refrain. We can thank Paglia 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for unpacking that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sentence. The "choice" involves choosing the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > annihilation of concrete
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > individuals at the hands of the powerful. (One 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > pictures an innocent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > serf being dragged to the gallows under a medieval 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > prince.) The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "right" claimed is an absolute authority over 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > another person's body.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/09/...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to