On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:07 PM, PoliticalAmazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, not intolerant or McCarthyish at all. > > I just dont' want another GOP loser to finish the destruction of the > country that Bush Jr started.
So you'd rather SMEAR her by quoting lies from the (giggle) "National Enquirer" as fact? Yes, in fact, you are "McCarthy-ish." > She's not qualified, period. Your OPINION, period. An objective analysis of her experience shows her to be AT LEAST as experienced as Obama. > SHe is untrustworthy and puts her own > selfish needs ahead of everything else, includng her family. No, she doesn't. You're just flailing. > She has > pimped her family repeatedly, dragging them out for campaign photops, > claiming she's a hockeymom, etc. Obama drags his kids and wife out for photo-ops, that's OK, but God forbid Palin do it...then it's "pimping." And last I checked, the definition of a "hockey mom" is a mom with a kid who plays hockey...Track played hockey...ergo, thusly and therefore, she's a hockey mom. > One of her big selling points with > GOP voters is that she says she represents thsoe family values, and > the only family values she demonstrates are th same kind of family > values we can see in cats in heat in an alley. On the contrary. Liberals like you have said this. Palin said in her speech at the convention that her family had problems, just like every other family. > > She lies repeatedly. Name two. > She cannot be trusted. Your opinion. Not a fact. > She will put her > marriage at risk because she is bored. I have no doubt that she would > put our country at risk at the drop of a hat, if it would suit her > purposes. She had, and still has, one of the highest recorded approval ratings for an Alaskan governor - she is liked and respected by members of both parties. She accomplished more good for Alaska in 2 years than the previous governor accomplished in 12. What you're engaged in now is called "sour grapes," and considering the piss-poor, laughable choice for VP Obama made, I can see why. > > The issue is not that she spread her legs for her husband's good > friend and business partner, Proof? Yeah, didn't think so. And no, the headlines from the "National Enquirer" (LMAO) don't count. > but that she is pretending she is > something she is not, and she risked her marriage to satsfy her own > carnal urges. > Proof? Yeah, didn't think so. And no, the headlines from the "National Enquirer" (LMAO) don't count. > We cannot trust what she says on this, or anything else. I say the > U.S. deserves better than Bush Jr, McCain and Palin. But the only other choice is Urkel and Hairplugs. That leaves us McCain Palin by the process of elimination. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
