But some wealthy persons have earned their wealth honestly and are
benevolent. We have a different sort these days. And many Christians-
Calvinists?- think wealth is a sign of God's favor upon an individual.
Read Job-OT.

On Sep 27, 3:34 am, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plutocracy
> Forms of government
>
> Plutocracy is rule by the wealthy, or power provided by wealth. In a
> plutocracy, the degree of economic inequality is high while the level
> of social mobility is low. This can apply to a multitude of government
> systems, as the key elements of plutocracy transcend and often occur
> concurrently with the features of those systems. The word plutocracy
> (Modern Greek: πλουτοκρατία - ploutokratia) is derived from the
> ancient Greek root ploutos, meaning wealth and kratein, meaning to
> rule or to govern.
> Usage
>
> The term plutocracy is generally used to describe two distinct
> concepts: one of a historical nature and one of a modern political
> nature. The former indicates the political control of the state by an
> oligarchy of the wealthy. Examples of such plutocracies include some
> city-states in Ancient Greece, the civilization of Carthage, the
> Italian merchant republics of Venice and Florence, and Genoa.
>
> Kevin Phillips, author and political strategist to U.S. President
> Richard Nixon, argues that the United States is a plutocracy in which
> there is a "fusion of money and government." [1].
> Modern political
>
> The second usage of plutocracy is a pejorative reference to a
> disproportionate influence the wealthy are said to have on political
> process in contemporary society. Positive influence includes campaign
> contributions and bribes; negative influence includes refusing to
> support the government financially by refusing to pay taxes,
> threatening to move profitable industries elsewhere, and so on. It can
> also be exerted by the owners and ad buyers of media properties which
> can shape public perception of political issues. Recent examples
> include Rupert Murdoch's News Corp's alleged political agendas in
> Australia, the UK [2] and the United States or the oil industry
> oligarchy, and billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, which may back right-
> leaning political action committees (PACs), as well as billionaire
> George Soros' efforts to influence US politics by backing left-leaning
> PACs.
> Recently, there have been numerous cases of wealthy individuals and
> organizations exerting financial pressure on governments to pass
> favorable legislation. (see: Lobbying) Most western democracies permit
> partisan organizations to raise funds for politicians, and it is well-
> known that political parties frequently accept significant donations
> from various individuals (either directly or through corporate
> institutions). Ostensibly this should have no effect on the
> legislative decisions of elected representatives; however it would be
> unlikely that no politicians are influenced by these contributions.
> Some describe these donations as bribes, although legally they are
> not. In the United States, campaign finance reform efforts seek to
> ameliorate this situation. However, campaign finance reform must
> successfully challenge officials who are beneficiaries of the system
> which allows this dynamic in the first place. This has led many reform
> advocates to suggest taxpayer dollars be used to replace private
> campaign contributions, these reforms are often called clean money,
> clean elections reform as opposed to simply campaign finance reform
> which does not address the conflict of interest involved where most or
> all of the campaign money is from private, often for-profit sources.
> Critics of so-called clean elections point out that that having the
> government decide which candidates would receive tax dollars and
> therefore be allowed to run would create an effective dictatorship
> where the government decides who the people can vote for.
>
> Forms of control
>
> A Plutocracy is a government controlled by a minuscule proportion of
> extremely wealthy individuals found in most societies. In many forms
> of government, those in power benefit financially, sometimes enough to
> belong to the aforementioned wealthy class.
>
> Classically, a plutocracy was an oligarchy, which is to say a
> government controlled by the wealthy few. Usually this meant that
> these ‘plutocrats’ controlled the executive, legislative and judicial
> aspects of government, the armed forces, and most of the natural
> resources. To a certain degree, there are still some situations in
> which private corporations and wealthy individuals may exert such
> strong influence on governments, that the effect can arguably be
> compared to a plutocracy.
> If there are no forms of control within the society, the plutocracy
> can easily collapse into a kleptocracy, "reign of thieves", where the
> powerholders attempt to confiscate as much public funds as possible as
> their private property. A kleptocratic state is usually thoroughly
> corrupt, has very little production and its economy is unstable. Many
> failed states represent kleptocracies.
>
> THE AMERICAN PLUTOCRACYhttp://www.progressiveliving.org/plutocracy_defined.htm
>         The specific American politicians who support plutocratic governance
> are identified here
>         To e-mail this page to a friend, click here
>         To search the Progressive Living site for more concerning plutocracy,
> click here
>         Read about the plutocratic agenda
>         Read about Progressivism, the antidote to Plutocracy
Go to the
> Progressive Living political Field Guide.
>         Go to the Progressive Living economics Field Guide
>         Go to the Progressive Living preamble
>         Go to the Progressive Living site map
>         Go to the Progressive Living welcome page
> See the resource on the Bush cabinet, with links that illustrate its
> plutocratic nature
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to