judging by the fact that you holly, are totally dismissing statements made by people in the know, I would have to say it is you who is playing dumb. except with you it is not playing.
Hollywood wrote: > d.b. > > Repeating Gov. Blunt's statement/claim, no matter how many times, is > NOT going to magically change WHAT he is saying into the truth. I > stand by my previous response. > Just who's playing dumb here? > > On Sep 28, 12:26�pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let me remind you, Jimmy Rocket, don't play dumb... unless you are. > > > > [UPDATE] - "This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most > > sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more > > offensive to Jefferson�s thinking than using the power of the state to > > deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose > > of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away > > from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress > > support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this > > anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads > > about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on > > television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation > > about the election. > > > > �Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press > > constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore > > false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no > > credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law > > enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent > > of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.� > > -http://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXq... > > > > On Sep 28, 7:49�am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > d,b. > > > > > I don't drink and drive, therefore I have no fear of being arrested > > > for that offense. And should , for some reason that were to happen, I > > > have no fear of conviction. Same goes for libel, or burglary or bank > > > robbery, etc. etc. > > > NO ONE can be prosecuted for criticising Obama. I thought we were > > > talking about committing libel? You understand the difference, don't > > > you? > > > > > WHAT abuse of law? ALL I have seen is some people claiming, without > > > proof, that someone might be planning to do so. Even your article > > > admits that this has NOT actually happened. > > > > > Show me a copy of these so called threatening letters to radio > > > stations. If a person, company, radio station is such a spineless > > > pussy that they would not exercse their constituional rights out of > > > fear that someone might criticize them ,or even take unfounded legal > > > action, then I guess that's what happens to pussies. Libel is NOT a > > > constituional right. > > > > > On Sep 28, 2:35�am, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > [Q] - Oh, now. Would people really refrain from criticizing Obama just > > > > because they fear being, er, sent to prison for it? > > > > > > � � [q] - This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most > > > > sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more > > > > offensive to Jefferson�s thinking than using the power of the state to > > > > deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose > > > > of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away > > > > from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress > > > > support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this > > > > anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads > > > > about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on > > > > television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation > > > > about the election. > > > > > > More at the link. Needless to say, no one actually has to be > > > > prosecuted for this to work. Prosecution will be impossible anyway in > > > > most cases thanks to the First Amendment. The point isn�t to jail > > > > critics but merely to price the cost of prospective litigation into > > > > their decision on whether to publicly criticize The One. Add this to > > > > the threatening letters his lawyers sent to station managers over the > > > > NRA ads, the flash-mob smearing of David Freddoso, and the appeal to > > > > the Justice Department to prosecute the American Issues Project for > > > > its perfectly factual yet devastating Ayers ad. Oh, the fun we�ll have > > > > with a deep blue Congress and an Obama-run DOJ and FCC. He promised > > > > you a �new type of politics,� didn�t he? Click the image to watch. > > > > -http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/27/missouri-governor-goes-nuclear-... > > > > > > On Sep 27, 11:56�pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > d.b. > > > > > > > Good. Don't commit criminal libel and you have no fear of libel > > > > > charges. It's like announcing a vigorous campain against druck > > > > > drivers. Don't drive drunk and you have no problems. You don't > > > > > understand the principle? > > > > > > > I repeat. Show me the statement by the aformentioned officials that is > > > > > their intention. All I see are statements by others CLAIMING that is > > > > > what they plan to do. > > > > > > > On Sep 27, 8:58�pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sep 27, 4:36�pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Details man DETAILS. SHOW those alleged plans. > > > > > > > > No playing dumb, Jimmy Rocket: > > > > > > > > [Q] - Missouri Sheriffs & Top Prosecutors Form Obama "Truth Squads" > > > > > > & > > > > > > Threaten Libel Charges Against Obama Critics > > > > > > > > More Hope and Change for Missouri... > > > > > > St. Louis and Missouri Democrat sheriffs and top prosecutors are > > > > > > planning to go after anyone who makes false statements against Obama > > > > > > during his campaign. This is so one sided I can't even begin to > > > > > > describe how wrong this agenda is. > > > > > > > > It's one thing if they want to keep the campaign fair for both > > > > > > sides, > > > > > > but they clearly only want to enforce the issue for the Obama Camp. > > > > > > > > KMOV has a video report on the Obama "Truth Squads". > > > > > > -http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/missouri-sheriffs-prosecute... > > > > > > > > [Q] - Barack Obama is used to having his way. Interestingly, he is > > > > > > not > > > > > > a fan of people pointing out when he�s lying about things like civil > > > > > > rights, especially that pesky Second Amendment. > > > > > > > > That�s why Obama has a team of hired goons - some call them lawyers > > > > > > - > > > > > > to threaten legal action against those who air his record: > > > > > > > > � � The Obama campaign sent cease and desist letters to news outlets > > > > > > in Pennsylvania and Ohio, denouncing the ads and demanding their > > > > > > removal from the airwaves. All stations where NRA-PVF has purchased > > > > > > or > > > > > > plans to purchase ads have been provided with documented evidence of > > > > > > Sen. Obama�s anti-gun record. > > > > > > > > The only problem is that the ads are based on a real, proven > > > > > > record. -http://www.thebitchgirls.us/?p=9252-Hidequoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
