anyone ever notice that all the moderators tend to be liberal obama
supporters?


On Oct 1, 6:43 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are you trying to make some kind of point ?
>
> On Oct 1, 6:13 am, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A debate “moderator” in the tank for Obama
>
> > My first syndicated column of the week, filed this afternoon, shines light 
> > on PBS anchor Gwen Ifill, who will moderate Thursday’s only vice 
> > presidential debate. Try as she might to deflect questions about her 
> > impartiality, her biases — and her conflict of interest — are clear. But 
> > don’t you dare breathe a word about any of this. You know what will happen 
> > if you do…
>
> > RACIST!
>
> > Sidenote: TVNewser reports that Ifill has broken her ankle, but she’s still 
> > going to do the debate. But will she disclose her conflict of interest? 
> > Inquiring minds want to know.
>
> > Ask the Commission on Presidential Debates if she will acknowledge her 
> > conflict of interest: 202-872-1020.
>
> > And here’s the e-mail address of Janet H. Brown, Executive Director of the 
> > Debates Commission: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Hopefully, their email system works better than the House.
>
> > Tons of readers recommend that Sarah Palin open her debate remarks by 
> > congratulating Ifill on her book and asking her to tell everyone the title.
>
> > ***
>
> > A debate “moderator” in the tank for Obama
> > by Michelle Malkin
> > Creators Syndicate
> > Copyright 2008
>
> > My dictionary defines “moderator” as “the nonpartisan presiding officer of 
> > a town meeting.” On Thursday, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill will serve as moderator 
> > for the first and only vice presidential debate. The stakes are high. The 
> > Commission on Presidential Debates, with the assent of the two campaigns, 
> > decided not to impose any guidelines on her duties or questions.
>
> > But there is nothing “moderate” about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. 
> > She’s so far in the tank for the Democrat presidential candidate, her 
> > oxygen delivery line is running out.
>
> > In an imaginary world where liberal journalists are held to the same 
> > standards as everyone else, Ifill would be required to make a full 
> > disclosure at the start of the debate. She would be required to turn to the 
> > cameras and tell the national audience that she has a book coming out on 
> > January 20, 2009 – a date that just happens to coincide with the 
> > inauguration of the next president of the United States.
>
> > The title of Ifill’s book? “Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of 
> > Obama.” Nonpartisan my foot.
>
> > Ifill’s publisher, Random House, is already busy hyping the book with 
> > YouTube clips of Ifill heaping praise on her subjects, including Obama and 
> > Obama-endorsing Mass. Governor Deval Patrick. The official promo for the 
> > book gushes:
>
> >   “In The Breakthrough, veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American 
> > political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama’s 
> > stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African 
> > American politicians forging a bold new path to political power…Drawing on 
> > interviews with power brokers like Senator Obama, former Secretary of State 
> > Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Reverend Jesse Jackson, and many others, 
> > as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as 
> > generational conflict and the ‘black enough’ conundrum, Ifill shows why 
> > this is a pivotal moment in American history.”
>
> > Ifill and her publisher are banking on an Obama/Biden win to buoy her book 
> > sales. The moderator expected to treat both sides fairly has grandiosely 
> > declared this the “Age of Obama.” Can you imagine a right-leaning 
> > journalist writing a book about the “stunning” McCain campaign and its 
> > “bold” path to reform timed for release on Inauguration Day – and then 
> > expecting a slot as a moderator for the nation’s sole vice presidential 
> > debate?
>
> > Yeah, I just registered 6.4 on the Snicker Richter Scale, too.
>
> > Despite the protestations of her colleagues that she will be fair, Ifill 
> > has appeared on numerous radio and TV talk shows over the past several 
> > months to cash in on her access to the Obama campaign. She recently penned 
> > a fawning cover story on the Obamas for Essence magazine that earned much 
> > buzz. The title? “The Obamas: Portrait of an American Family.” A sample of 
> > Ifill’s hard-hitting investigative journalism, illustrated with 
> > Kennedyesque photos of the Obamas and children posing at home on the 
> > backporch and by the piano:
>
> >   “Barack Obama is sitting in the back of his rented luxury campaign bus 
> > with its granite counters and two flat-screen TVs. The Illinois senator’s 
> > arms are wrapped around his wife, Michelle, whom he doesn’t get to see much 
> > these days. At this very moment he is, of all things, singing.”
>
> > During the Democratic National Convention, Ifill offered her neutral 
> > analysis before Michelle Obama’s speech on NBC News: “A lot of people have 
> > never seen anything that looks like a Michelle Obama before. She’s 
> > educated, she’s beautiful, she’s tall, she tells you what she thinks and 
> > they hope that she can tell a story about Barack Obama and about herself…”
>
> > During the Republican National Convention, the PBS ombudsman fielded 
> > numerous complaints about Ifill’s coverage of Sarah Palin’s speech. Wrote 
> > Brian Meyers of Granby, Ct.:
>
> >   “I was appalled by Gwen Ifill’s commentary directly following Gov. Sarah 
> > Palin’s speech. Her attitude was dismissive and the look on her face was 
> > one of disgust. Clearly, she was agitated by what most critics view as a 
> > well-delivered speech. It is quite obvious that Ms. Ifill supports Obama as 
> > she struggled to say anything redemptive about Gov. Palin’s performance. I 
> > am disappointed in Ms. Ifill’s complete disregard for journalistic 
> > objectivity.”
>
> > Like Obama, Ifill, who is black, is quick to play the race card at the 
> > first sign of criticism. In an interview with the Washington Post a few 
> > weeks ago, she carped: “[N]o one’s ever assumed a white reporter can’t 
> > cover a white candidate.”
>
> > It’s not the color of your skin, sweetie. It’s the color of your politics. 
> > Perhaps Ifill will be able to conceal it this week. But if the “stunning” 
> > “Breakthrough” she’s rooting for comes to pass on January 20, 2009, nobody 
> > will be fooled.
>
> > ***
>
> > Here’s the video clip of Ifill’s reaction to Palin’s RNC speech:
>
> > ***
>
> > As Instapundit’s newsroom correspondent put it: “The fix is in, and it’s 
> > working.”
>
> > Bob Unruh adds:
>
> >   Ifill declined to return a WND telephone message asking for a comment 
> > about her book project and whether its success would be expected should 
> > Obama lose. But she has faced criticism previously for not treating 
> > candidates of both major parties the same.
>
> >   During a vice-presidential candidate debate she moderated in 2004 – when 
> > Democrat John Edwards attacked Republican Dick Cheney’s former employer, 
> > Halliburton – the vice president said, “I can respond, Gwen, but it’s going 
> > to take more than 30 seconds.”
>
> >   “Well, that’s all you’ve got,” she told Cheney.
>
> >   Ifill told the Associated Press Democrats were delighted with her answer, 
> > because they “thought I was being snippy to Cheney.” She explained that 
> > wasn’t her intent.
>
> > Uh-huh.
>
> >http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/30/a-debate-%e2%80%9cmoderator%e2%8...
>
> >  1aessence.jpg
> > 45KViewDownload
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to