And one way or another, you all will willing to give your hard to earn money to the big bankers, so that they can continue to rob everybody, and encourage all the biggest and sleaziest employers to relocate to some of themost unregulated areas of the world. And that is what mascarades as pariotism. Oh and then there are those who have been given contracts to supply defective goods to the US military, for exorbitant prices, is that to being a good American. If so I am glad that nobody would ever think of me as an American good or bad.
On Oct 2, 3:39 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are the one who supports Liberals and Democrats... > > The same people who try to return us to the times of the "Fairness > Doctrine", which is an attempt to subvert Free Speech. > > So please, you "claim" to Love the Constitution, except when Liberals > want to spit on it. > > On Oct 2, 12:25 am, SgtUSMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I just hate Bush for his liberalism. > > > On Oct 2, 3:25 am, SgtUSMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why do you assume I'm in agreement with the current drug laws or > > > prostitution laws? > > > > Since you asked, no, I'm not for the drug laws. I'm a social liberal > > > and a fiscal conservative. I've tried to tell you this before. > > > > I don't have a party whifch represents me. > > > > On Oct 2, 2:59 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You're so full of shit Sarge, your eyes are Brown. > > > > > I support all of the Constitution. > > > > > Now tell me Sarge, where does the Constitution give YOU, or anyone > > > > else for that matter, the Right to make Laws about things they were > > > > not given Authority over, like the Drug Laws or Laws against > > > > Prostitution and the like?!?!?!?!? > > > > > You understand what a "Victimless Crime" is, right? > > > > > Tell me, according to our Constitution, how can you have a Crime if no > > > > one's Right's were infringed? > > > > > Yet I assume you are all for the Drug Laws, right Sarge? > > > > > You little Fascist you. > > > > > On Oct 1, 11:53 pm, SgtUSMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > No, I'm for all ten of the bill of rights. Unlike you, I am not > > > > > partisan. > > > > > > It's up to you to tell me which one of the other nine amendments you > > > > > support. We can start with freedom of speech. The Bush administration > > > > > said you are eith fer us or agin us. He denounced anyone who > > > > > excercised their freedom of speech against his Iraq "plan." I know you > > > > > won't go against your lord god Bush. > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:48 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 1, 10:14 pm, SgtUSMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, the Republicans > > > > > > > oppose the other nine and any unlisted inalienable right. > > > > > > > So you say Sarge... > > > > > > > Your Partisan bias is duly noted.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
