*Bonanza. Bailout. Bonanza.
*By Debra Saunders
October 2, 2008

Who do I blame for this financial disaster? Let me count the villains.

Start with President Bush and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. By their own
actions, they have shown that they believe markets have become too
vulnerable under their watch.

The Bush administration has mishandled the $700 billion bailout at every
juncture. They pulled a too-large number out of the hat, then asked Congress
to write a blank check. Paulson even rejected limits on the compensation of
the geniuses who bought bad mortgage paper with other people's money. No way
was Congress going to go along with that scheme.

Like many Americans, I am angry and have strong doubts as to whether the
bailout is necessary. Having proposed it, however, Paulson probably made it
necessary. If there is a 10 percent risk of an economic collapse without a
bailout, Washington probably has to pass something.

I blame Democrats, who pushed to give government-supported mortgage giants
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac more flexibility to buy dicey home loans, despite
their accounting irregularities. It was Senate Banking Committee Democrats
who blocked GOP-backed reforms of Fannie and Freddie in 2003 and 2006 -- but
that doesn't stop them from disowning any role in this fiasco now.

I blame Democratic leaders for larding the Senate version of the bailout
bill with what the national political news website Politico.com described as
a landmark provision that would require that "insurance companies provide
coverage for mental-health treatment -- such as hospitalization -- on parity
with physical illnesses."

This bill is in trouble, and the Democratic leaders decide to add $100
billion to the total tab -- as well as make a new enemy, insurance
companies. And they think Bush is dumb.

I blame congressional Republicans for being addicted to pork-barrel projects
and driving federal spending so high that they lost control of the House and
Senate in 2006. In their greed, they forfeited their credibility.

House Republicans didn't help themselves when they said that House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi's partisan pre-vote rant killed 10 Republican "yes" votes. They
showed America that -- like Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid --
their instinct was to throw the blame at the other party first, then to
think about what is best for America.

Oh, and you can thank Senate Republicans for a five-year, $3.3 billion rural
school aid measure packed onto the bailout bill. Shameless.

Pelosi and Reid have played this as poorly as Bush. Last week, they said
they had a deal. Clearly, they don't know the meaning of the word "deal."
The leadership of the party that believes in more government regulation
cannot count votes (a simple accounting procedure) and cannot regulate
itself.
When she was supposed to be rallying all House members, Pelosi instead
brandished her dagger, as she parroted that lame old line about Republicans
believing in "no regulation." It is amazing how a party that flatters itself
for its intellectual wattage can disseminate such patently false drivel with
wide eyes.


Sure, maybe two Republicans in Washington oppose most regulation. But look
at the party's nominee, John McCain. Not only did McCain push for improved
regulation of Freddie and Fannie, he also voted for the 2002 accounting
oversight measure, Sarbanes-Oxley -- that was supposed to prevent another
Enron -- and authored a measure to regulate campaign spending.

I'm a small-government conservative. But I've worked for other people since
I was a teenager -- and that sort of experience leaves me with only a jaded
respect for how the "free market" works. It doesn't work without regulation.


Most of all, I blame the financial masterminds on Wall Street, who have
justified their high salaries because they were supposed to be so clever --
yet apparently had no idea that they were buying inflated paper.

Although if Congress keeps larding the bailout to the point that America
will need a bailout for the bailout, then the order of my list could change.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to