Again, I asked you if looking into specific acts of Obama's were what you considered being a "hater"...
Still no surprise that you cannot answer a simple question, and instead need to go off on your own Partisan tripe. On Oct 2, 12:31 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > had you read it and kept it in in context you would find i was admonishing > "party politics" from either side. Yet this shortcoming from you is indeed > indicative of those parties and their pundits (definition of pundit--- > person with their heads up their "leaders" ass) and the biggest problem in > US politics. You immediately went into attack mode to defend a 44 year old > woman who i'm quite sure can defend herself. If elected she will be > "vice-president". there is no gender attached to the office. > > On 10/2/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 2, 11:32 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > and the Obama haters on the right as well. From your reply i can see that > > > you just don't get it at all. > > > Your words, not mine... > > > I was simply trying to hold you to account for them. > > > Not surprisingly... You cannot. > > -- > Mark M. Kahle > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
