Go Tell It to the Mountain
http://www.truthout.org/100308EA
Voters in the battleground state of Nevada could be swayed by Obama's
and McCain's positions on the Bush administration's recent push to
open the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site. The Bush
administration is pushing full speed ahead with plans to store nuclear
waste at Yucca Mountain - and that could affect the presidential race
in the battleground state of Nevada, where John McCain and Barack
Obama are in a dead heat.
Last month, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission agreed to review the
federal government's license application for the site, where it wants
to store spent fuel from nuclear plants around the U.S. as well as
military nuclear waste. The review is expected to take about four
years, and if all goes as planned (a very big if), the Bush
administration says Yucca Mountain could open in 2020.
Yesterday, the U.S. EPA issued new radiation standards for Yucca,
responding to a 2004 federal court ruling that found its initial
regulations inadequate. The new regs are the same as the previous ones
in the standards they set for the first 10,000 years after waste
disposal: the average human living within 18 kilometers of the
facility should be exposed to no more than 15 millirem of radiation
per year, about what one would get from an X-ray. What's different is
that the new regs tighten the standards for years 10,000 to 1 million,
from 350 millirems to 100. Yep, the court required the agency to plan
a million years into the future.
Most Nevadans probably aren't concerned about the particulars of
radiation standards set for tens of thousands of years from now - they
are just generally opposed to the idea of 77,700 tons of waste being
shipped to a site 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas. The state has
petitioned the NRC to reject the federal government's license
application. In a recent poll, 58 percent of Nevadans surveyed said
they opposed the storing of nuclear waste at Yucca.
Anti-Yucca sentiment, brought front of mind by the Bush
administration's recent moves to push the project forward, would seem
to benefit Obama; he's opposed to using Yucca as a waste site while
McCain is a longtime supporter of the idea. "I believe we have to have
a waste repository, and I believe Yucca Mountain is a place that can
be made safe," McCain said in an interview in May 2007. McCain is also
more pro-nuke than Obama, proposing to build 45 new nuclear reactors
in the U.S. by 2030, and 55 more after that. Obama has run ads in
Nevada criticizing McCain for supporting Yucca.
How much will Yucca Mountain actually matter at the ballot box? A
poll conducted in August found 60 percent of Nevadans saying the Yucca
issue would have some influence on their vote, including 23 percent
who said it would sway their vote; 38 percent said it would not affect
their vote. Among independents, 69 percent said the issue would
influence their vote at least to some extent. In a closely fought
swing state, those are numbers to be noted, but for now they haven't
pushed Obama ahead of McCain.
Nevada Sens. Harry Reid (D) and John Ensign (R) yesterday
condemned the EPA's new radiation standards and said they would
continue to push for a nuclear-waste solution that doesn't involve
Yucca. Said Reid, "Instead of working to protect the health and safety
of Nevadans, EPA and [the Department of Energy] are casting science
aside in an attempt to get the nuclear waste dump approved."
Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), chair of the House Select Committee on
Energy Independence and Global Warming, also weighed in on the
development, and linked it to presidential politics: "Today's new
rules make clear that the Department of Energy jumped prematurely with
an answer before the question had been finished," he said. "They need
to withdraw the application, finish their homework assignment, and
resubmit it. The rules on Yucca Mountain are especially critical given
that some in Congress, including Sen. McCain, are calling for an
explosion in nuclear construction that would generate the need for a
new Yucca Mountain every 17 to 24 years."
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
