SCIENCE HAS BECOME A RELIGION TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD.
If you think you are getting the truth from mainstream sources such as
NASA and JPL then you must also believe in the Easter Bunny, Tooth
Fairy and Santa Clause. Under Dog black market publishers such as I
have no political axe to grind so we report unbiased information free
of the usual propaganda put forth for societal manipulation.
In ancient times religion was the science. The priests and monks did
most of the work building cathedrals and manufactured things out of
metal. They made the jewelry, swords and great works of art. They even
made the white-powder-of-gold for life extension with electric
currents or by boiling source materials in alkaline solutions. They
mixed the perfumes, oils and ointments for the anointed ones. They
composed music, wrote and painted and made stain glass. Their
workmanship was exquisite; and theirs was the craft. Some how it all
got turned around when they took the "K" and the "man" out of
workmanship and called it worship.
Some time in the past one of them asked the question, "Why are we
doing all this work when we can make the people do it for us?" Now all
they do is sit around and collect money.
The various religions affiliations of the people involved in the
various scientific projects dictate what kind of information that is
being released by the so called "official" government sponsored web
sites. These people would just as well kill their own kind than have
to admit they made a mistake by not telling the truth. We see
Catholics killing Catholics and people with different religious
affiliations killing each other even though they all believe in the
same God. It doesn't matter what your religion is these days they will
kill to perpetuate their own believe systems for world domination.
Brad and I are discovering that much of our so-called science is
utterly false, religiously biased, or put forth as an infomercial to
get more money from the government. The problem is that everyone
accepts what the major universities endorse, because we have been
brainwashed to believe that university educated people are smarter
than everyone else. We know this just isn't the case because there are
men and women walking the planet today who make the university people
look like mental midgets.
The scientific status quo wants to keep people believing that
Universities are the only place in the Universe where higher learning
exists. They would also have us believe that Earth is the only place
in the Universe where intelligent life exists. If you showed them an
actual alien in your freezer they would not admit that life could
exist elsewhere.
Sir Isaac Newton laid to rest the idea that there were areas of
knowledge inaccessible to the human mind. Newton invented calculus,
formulated the laws of mechanics and motion and proposed a universal
theory of gravitation. Before Newton there was much thinking that
humankind was entitled to comprehend only what God designed to reveal.
Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden for eating of the
tree of knowledge; God's knowledge! This same religious dogma is alive
and well today in many of our schools and universities.
Brad and I seek true understanding of nature beyond the human sense of
perception and experience, all of which teaches us that our grasp of
the world can be mistaken. The very nature of science itself is not
immutable laws but a flowing river of ever changing knowledge and
ideas. Mainstream academia doesn't like amateurs messing around in
their field because we might show them up or discover something they
may have overlooked. In fact, they actually fear us because we might
bring to the table new ideas that would throw all their scientific
dogma out the window. The humorous part of this situation is that we
may have actually done just that.
The various fields of science are set up in such a way to protect the
livelihoods of the accredited university-trained, individuals because
that is where the money is ("follow the money"). However, the very
nature of the training itself with its structured, learning and
compartmentalized, curriculums tend to stifle individual creative
thought. When an amateur discovers something important (most
scientific discoveries are made by amateurs) it makes the experts look
stupid.
Some of us cannot fit into the educational system because it does not
give us the tools we need to do the kind of math or science that we
want to pursue. One of the reasons I can write this book and figure
out where we are going in our own galaxy is due to the fact my mind is
not cluttered with worthless preconceptions of how things are.
IT'S ALL ABOUT MONEY
"Follow the money!" All you have to do is find a energy producing
project with the potential to kill billions and the government will
throw billions of dollars at it like there is no tomorrow. Hot fusion
is one of these projects that can't possibly work because it takes the
gravitational force of a sun to compress the fuel enough to maintain
fusion. Who cares if it doesn't work as long as it keeps several
thousand people employed for the next fifty years? After fifty years
has gone by and the concept is proven wrong all the people originally
involved in the project will be dead or collecting social security. So
who cares?
BRIAN B. O'LEARY
The following is a selected quote of Dr. Brian O'Leary from his book,
Exploring Inner and Outer Space.
Dr. Brian O'Leary he was one of the first NASA astronauts chosen for
the Mars missions.
"Thirty years of deadness, I thought. 'Thirty years of left-brain
programming at schools and universities, reciting rote memory to
advance myself and to please others. Thirty year of making the true
joys of life seem like an escape, a simulation of reality, a day at
Disneyland where the replica of the Matterhorn was the real
Matterhorn. I felt I had been brain-damaged, that I had missed out on
life." "We are not only trapped on the Earth's surface we are trapped
to the limiting beliefs of materialism."
"Who am I? I asked. Where did I come from? Where am I going? What is
the real nature of the Universe? Not even a Bachelors degree in
physics from Williams College, nor a Masters in astronomy from
Georgetown, nor a Ph.D. in astronomy from Berkley (Doctor of
Philosophy seems a misnomer), nor my astronaut training, nor my
faculty positions at Cornell, Caltech, Berkley, San Francisco State,
Hampshire, U Mass and Princeton, nor my Congressional staff positions
and Presidential candidate advisory positions, nor my books and 100
articles published in prestigious journals, nor my Catholic upbringing-
none of this now mattered. For thirty years I had distracted myself
from me-the only one who could really find the answers, or begin to
find them. These questions, these experiences, transcended the
intellectual sphere, a tiny world embedded in a much larger fabric of
reality."
Dr. Brian O'Leary is one of my heroes. He is a man in his sixties who
taught physics and astronomy at more than eight universities and was
selected by NASA to go to Mars -- a man highly integrated into the
educational system who finally came to the realization that something
is wrong with it. He is my hero because he finally figured it out. We
share the same realization! He goes on to quote James Lovelock in his
book, Exploring Inner and Outer Space page 111.
"…In his landmark book Gaia and The Ages of Gaia, inventor-scientist,
James Lovelock advanced the theory that the Earth itself behaves as a
self-organizing super-organism. According to Lovelock, many of our
support systems hang in a delicate balance that is continuing to be
threatened by our environmental pollution—the ravages of forestry,
agriculture, acid rain and depletion of our fragile ozone layer, and
the greenhouse effect."
"You may think the academic scientist is the analogue of the
independent artist. " He writes, "In fact, nearly all scientists are
employed by some large organization, such as a government department,
a university, or a multinational company. Only rarely are they free to
express their science as a personal view. They may think they are
free, but in reality they are, nearly all of them, employees; they
have traded freedom of thought for good working conditions, a steady
income, tenure, and a pension."
"Lovelock also laments the scientists' dependence on bureaucratic
funding, the constraints of staying within a narrow discipline, and
the pressures of peer-review: "Lacking freedom they are in danger of
succumbing to a finicky quality or of becoming, like mediaeval
theologians, the creatures of dogma." He then speculates that, had he
been working at an institution, his research on a living Earth would
certainly not have been funded, nor would it have been condoned by a
hypothetical lab director, even if the research had been done on his
own time.
"I have had to become a "radical scientist," he said, "also because
the scientific community is reluctant to accept new theories as fact,
and rightly so. It was nearly 150 years before the notion that heat is
a measure of the speed of molecule became a fact of science, and 40
years before plate tectonics was accepted by the scientific
community."
It was Lovelock's advice that convinced Brian O'Leary to go his own
way supporting himself by lecturing around the country and by
"whatever means comes to hand." "I believe we cannot any longer afford
the luxuries of comfortable old thinking or exhaustive "show-
me-"proofs. We have a planet to heal, and this includes ourselves, our
communities, and our nations. The greater reality becomes not a parlor
game for a metaphysical elite, but a necessity."
I couldn't have said it better myself!
The scientific inquisition fears right brain thinking individuals
because they cannot visualize or easily categorize their contribution
to the fabric of reality. Our society has ostracized, burned at the
stake and persecuted right-brained thinking for centuries.
Michael A. Cremo on a Russian lecture tour about anthropology and how
our archeologist might skip over important evidence because it doesn't
fit the generally accepted scientific paradigm called it "The
knowledge filtering process." "In most cases it is not the scientist
who believes that they are hiding 'true' evidence, which if known to
the public, would cause them to reject their theories. Instead, when
scientists encounter evidence that radically contradicts their
theoretical expectations, they simply conclude, based on the deeply
held religious beliefs in the correctness of their own theories, that
something must be wrong with the evidence."
"Scientists will embrace a concept that they think is true and because
they have all the power and the money they will act on that concept." -
Tom Bearden
As amateur scientists we do not have to suck up to the government or
anybody else to keep from getting fired. We are self-employed and we
don't care if the status quo freaks within the government ridicule us.
So what if our findings based on actual, measurable, scientific-data
disagree with the lies put forth by their pseudo scientific
bureaucracy. They are loosing credibility due to the lies and
outright fraud they have perpetrated on the American people. We know
that they cannot stop lying for fear of loosing control. I don't mind
being called a non-specialist. The specialist should be able to defend
his or her point of view on the intellectual field of battle. If a
critic really is a specialist then he or she should be able to point
out mistakes instead of making vague blanket accusations. When dealing
with math describing physical bodies orbiting in space the math
usually doesn't lie.
I am aware the quantitative science is entirely based on data derived
through the use of "objective measuring devices." Academic science has
produced a mechanistic world-view because of its reliance on measuring
devices. The world view reduces all natural dynamics to the
collective activity of four fundamental forces" who's collective blend
produces "force patterns." When the "force patterns" are encountered
by sensing organisms, they are "locally interpreted" in stimulated
nervous systems as "the world view."
This quantified world-view cannot describe sensations, qualities, or
awareness. These experimental realities are fundamentally distinct
energies that have extent and continuity in space. We see the utter
collapse of quantitative analysis when it attempts to analyze
experimental realities. Capable only of describing energy field
epiphenomena, it selectively filters out the very center of what it
examines. There are many academicians who cannot comprehend why this
occurs.
Quantitative science has been continually constricting its world view
by adopting the inferior examination methods which its instruments
provide thus misguiding its own consciousness from the most
fundamental and accessible world view. Why aren't they looking in the
ultraviolet light spectrums? This is the spectrum that powers all life
and gives us oxygen to breathe. Why do they refuse to even consider
the effects that this much more powerful invisible energy source from
space has on our environment? If human experience is invalid, then
who decided weather or not instrumental examinations of Nature were
not valid? More valid compared to what or whom? Whose "faulty"
consciousness decided that ridiculous contradiction? These
continually emerging inconsistencies are the embarrassing "warning
signs" to quantitative method. There is a lot of fear involved
being a leader in the pseudo-scientific community. If they stopped
lying and told the truth their entire system (government-run companies
that put out politically biased and altered scientific data for the
purpose of molding public opinion to wring money out of congress and
the taxpayers) would fall like a house of cards. Thousands of people
would loose their jobs. Once they start a lie like this they can never
turn back and they will kill hundreds even thousands to perpetuate the
lie because they "believe" it is for the common good.
Airliners have dropped out of the sky for less. Was Boeing's laser
cannon trained on the space shuttle during its fateful reentry?
Investigative reporters cannot find any record of where the cannon was
nor any of the data from the shuttle's sensors. There is no record of
a target drone ever deployed to test this device. The outside skin of
the shuttle is covered with sensors making it the ideal target drone
for such a test.
Then there is the fear of ridicule and peer pressure for making a
mistake in their line of work, especially when dealing with highly
filtered information. The fear of death threats from superiors and
Black Ops people looking down their necks threatening to kill their
families is very real. If they let slip one tiny bit of information
that might be considered vital to national security all would be lost
so they are very careful to toe the line. If such a thing happened
they would be branded a spy and never be able to work again. Such a
situation where we already have 35,000 people living and working on
the Moon and a few thousand more on Mars makes it quite difficult to
keep it all under wraps.
Fear hangs over their necks like the sword of Damocles.
Our government fears that if the truth got out the majority of the
American public who now believe the great illusion that we are the
only intelligent life in the Universe that they would be become
disillusioned and stop paying the voluntary income tax and move to
another country. Last but not least there is the fear that if they
ever did get laid off and were forced to get a job in the private
sector that they would not be able to earn a living. The private
sector is rough. The private sector is highly competitive and demands
productivity-something that a cumber-ground government employee is not
used to.
The evidence shows that the top secret space program has used
suppressed physics models to produce "space-based antigravity control
technologies. This is how they got to the Moon and this is why they
faked the Moon photographs. This is why the soil underneath the Lunar
Lander wasn't disturbed. Where was the blast crater? You would think
that if rockets were used to lower it down on the Moon there would
have been a giant blast crater. The astronauts would have needed a
long ladder to climb up out of the crater. If this had been a real
lunar landing you'd be lucky to see the top of the Lunar Lander down
in the dust at the bottom of a huge hole. You'd think the people who
filmed this event inside a giant movie studio-aircraft hanger would
have been smart enough to take a shovel and dig a blast crater.
Oh yea! That photograph all the astronauts signed with the earth
positioned 6 degrees above the lunar surface couldn't possibly be
true. Brad actually got NASA to admit it was faked. If the picture had
been taken from the landing site the Earth would be more like 60
degrees above the horizon. The sky would be black, not blue and you
would see planets or at least stars in the background. Why did all the
astronauts commit perjury? What are they hiding?
What they are hiding is the fact that they already have antigravity
technology and astronomers have seen it at work. With this kind of
anti-gravity vehicle, "bumping" a comet into a specified path would be
no effort whatever. Here you have the ultimate weapon. You could
annihilate an entire nation of people by simply nudging a comet so
that it would strike earth at the correct location and nobody would be
the wiser; that is, of course, unless you knew they had this kind of
technology.
One aspect of this situation is that it is comforting to know the
"Secret" Space Program has the capability to 'steer' a meteorite so
that it will miss Earth. If you have a good working spacecraft the
technology doesn't seem that difficult. All you have to do is match
their speed of 46,000 miles per hour, come alongside and start pushing
like a space bulldozer. Hopefully whoever is controlling this
technology will have the heart to save us from such a disaster. On
the other hand you have a scary "Secret" Space Program controlled by
the Nazi (NASA) Masonic Order with the capability to steer meteorites
which gives them the capability to reduce the world population by 95 %
overnight.... It all depends on who is in charge and how benevolent
their feelings are toward humanity. This constant lying to protect
military secrets doesn't add to science. When you do this kind of
speculation with taxpayer's money (our money) it is being dishonest.
It also doesn't do us any good because it does not help determine when
the next big one will hit.
Even if the government-sponsored, scientists did discover when the
next big one will hit I don't think they would tell us or even bother
to attempt saving us. Government-sponsored research into these things
has become a hideous, self-serving religion and personal agenda to
ensure the survival of the followers of their own faith and race so
that they can take over the world after everybody else is dead. "There
is only so much room in the bomb shelter." What kind of mentally
constipated world population will we have in the future if these
people are the only ones left to repopulate it? I am now beginning to
believe this same scenario took place during each of the last four
extinctions and may be the reason we are still earth bound. It may
also explain why there are so many stupid people in the world because
the meek really did inherit the earth several times thereby diluting
the gene pool. We should have inherited the stars by now.
For more on this subject Read my book, The Frog Is Cooked and
Spaceships Of The gods.
So far, all evidence suggests that they would take our money for
research of impending threats to Earth, use it to build underground
shelters and when a big meteor comes in, watch us die. Decades of
sucking up to keep their jobs, peer-pressure and working under the
threat of death to keep this knowledge from us, has robbed them of
their humanity and soul.
www.GuardDogBooks.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
