Gaar, I'm not changing jack shit. Your saying corp. pay too much in taxes and that the burden should be placed on the consumer.
I pointed out that corporations pass along the cost of those taxes to to consumer. What the fuck is it with you and the word "admitted'? I made a statement, I expressed an opinion. Fine, you want to be a total freak about semantics now. When corporations no longer send money to the govt. which the govt. and the accountants on both sides choose to call to call "taxes" you know good and damned well where the govt. will go to replace the "money they choose to call corp. taxes". Bring it on, it it's a "loony" position you should have no trouble whatsoever discrediting ot. On Oct 8, 7:35 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 7, 10:39 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh, so if corporations do not pay taxes how many guesses do I get as > > to who the government will go to to replace those lost revenues? > > I thought you already admitted it was the People who pay regardless? > > Are you changing that now because it doesn't help support your Lony > Liberal position? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
