From: *Travis*
Date: Wed, Oct 8, 2008
Subject:  Revolution you can believe in





http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/2073071/revolution-you-can-believ
e-in.thtml

Revolution you can believe in
Tuesday, 9th September 2008

In her game-changing convention speech, Sarah Palin took a swipe at Obama
for having been nothing more in his life than a 'community organiser'.

This prompted the Obama campaign to issue a pained defence of community
organisation as a way of promoting social change 'from the bottom up'. The
impression is that community organising is a worthy if woolly and ultimately
ineffectual grassroots activity. This is to miss something of the greatest
importance: that in the world of Barack Obama, community organisers are a
key strategy in a different game altogether; and the name of that game is
revolutionary Marxism.

The seditious role of the community organiser was developed by an extreme
left intellectual called Saul Alinsky. He was a radical Chicago activist
who, by the time he died in 1972, had had a profound influence on the
highest levels of the Democratic party. Alinsky was a 'transformational
Marxist' in the mould of Antonio Gramsci, who promoted the strategy of a
'long march through the institutions' by capturing the culture and turning
it inside out as the most effective means of overturning western society. In
similar vein, Alinsky condemned the New Left for alienating the general
public by its demonstrations and outlandish appearance. The revolution had
to be carried out through stealth and deception. Its proponents had to
cultivate an image of centrism and pragmatism. A master of infiltration,
Alinsky wooed Chicago mobsters and Wall Street financiers alike. And
successive Democratic politicians fell under his spell.

His creed was set out in his book 'Rules for Radicals' – a book he dedicated
to Lucifer, whom he called the 'first radical'. It was Alinsky for whom
'change' was his mantra. And by 'change', he meant a Marxist revolution
achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society
inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the
trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of
morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it. And the way to do
this, he said, was through 'people's organisations'.

Community organisers would mobilise direct action by the oppressed masses
against their capitalist oppressors. In FrontPageMagazine.Com John Perazzo
writes:

These People's Organizations were to be composed largely of discontented
individuals who believed that society was replete with injustices that
prevented them from being able to live satisfying lives. Such organizations,
Alinsky advised, should not be imported from the outside into a community,
but rather should be staffed by locals who, with some guidance from trained
radical organizers, could set their own agendas.

The installment of local leaders as the top-level officers of People's
Organizations helped give the organizations credibility and authenticity in
the eyes of the community. This tactic closely paralleled the longtime
Communist Party strategy of creating front organizations that ostensibly
were led by non-communist fellow-travelers, but which were in fact
controlled by Party members behind the scenes...

Alinsky viewed as supremely important the role of the organizer, or
master manipulator, whose guidance was responsible for setting the agendas
of the People's Organization... Alinsky laid out a set of basic principles
to guide the actions and decisions of radical organizers and the People's
Organizations they established. The organizer, he said, 'must first rub raw
the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of
overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than
avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough
to act.'[40] The organizer's function, he added, was 'to agitate to the
point of conflict'[41] and 'to maneuver and bait the establishment so that
it will publicly attack him as a "dangerous enemy." '[42] 'The word 'enemy,'
said Alinsky, 'is sufficient to put the organizer on the side of the
people';[43] i.e., to convince members of the community that he is so eager
to advocate on their behalf, tha t he has willingly opened himself up to
condemnation and derision.

Obama's connection with Alinsky, whom he never met but whom he reportedly
idolised, was through two bodies promoting the Alinsky model of community
organisation, ACORN and the Gamaliel Foundation. John Perazzo again:

Obama was trained by the Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation
(IAF) in Chicago and worked for an affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation,
whose modus operandi for the creation of 'a more just and democratic
society' is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method. As The Nation magazine puts
it, 'Obama worked in the organizing tradition of Saul Alinsky, who made
Chicago the birthplace of modern community organizing...' In fact, for
several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method.

But Obama brought a special slant to Alinsky's radicalism.Far from being –
as he has been painted – a 'post-racial' politician, Obama's politics are
all about promoting the cause of black people and achieving 'reparations'
from white society (a perspective through which his whole welfare
redistribution agenda is framed). Accordingly, he saw his three-year role as
a community organiser in Chicago as mobilising black people for action
against their white oppressors. Finding himself hampered in creating an
activist network among black churches, he decided to join such a church to
give himself more credibility. That's why he joined the infamous black-power
Trinity Church of Christ – a move, it seems, that had less to do with any
spiritual quest than as a radical tactic for mobilising the black
proletariat.

According to Stanley Kurtz in National Review (subscription required), as a
trainer for Gamaliel and ACORN Obama used his influence to secure a major
increase in funding for both groups. Kurtz writes of Gamaliel, one of the
least known yet most influential national umbrella groups for church-based
community organizers:

Gamaliel specializes in ideological stealth, and Obama, a master student
of Gamaliel strategy, shows disturbing signs of being a sub rosa radical
himself. Obama's legislative tactics, as well as his persistent professions
of non-ideological pragmatism, appear to be inspired by his radical mentors'
most sophisticated tactics. Not only has Obama studied, taught, and
apparently absorbed stealth techniques from radical groups like Gamaliel and
ACORN, but in his position as a board member of Chicago's supposedly
nonpartisan Woods Fund, he quietly funneled money to his radical allies --
at the very moment he most needed their support to boost his political
career.

Kurtz also quotes Rutgers political scientist Heidi Swarts who, in her book
Organizing Urban America: Secular and Faith-based Progressive Movements,
lays out the strategy of stealth:

Swarts calls groups like ACORN and (especially) Gamaliel 'invisible
actors,' hidden from public view because they often prefer to downplay their
efforts, because they work locally, and because scholars and journalists pay
greater attention to movements with national profiles (like the Sierra Club
or the Christian Coalition). Congregation-based community organizations like
Gamaliel, by contrast, are often invisible even at the local level. A
newspaper might report on a demonstration led by a local minister or priest,
for example, without noticing that the clergyman in question is part of the
Gamaliel network. 'Though often hidden from view,' says Swarts, 'leaders
have intentionally and strategically organized these movements that appear
to well up and erupt from below.'

Although Gamaliel and ACORN have significantly different tactics and
styles, Swarts notes that their political goals and ideologies are broadly
similar. Both groups press the state for economic redistribution. The
tactics of Gamaliel and ACORN have been shaped in a 'post-Alinsky' era of
welfare reform and conservative resurgence, posing a severe challenge to
those who wish to expand the welfare state. The answer these activists have
hit upon, says Swarts, is to work incrementally in urban areas, while
deliberately downplaying the far-Left ideology that stands behind their
carefully targeted campaigns.

To avoid seeming like radicals or 'hippies left over from the sixties,'
Gamaliel organizers are careful to wear conventional clothing and conduct
themselves with dignity, even formality. Since liberal social movements tend
to come off as naïve and idealistic, Gamaliel organizers make a point of
presenting their ideas as practical, pragmatic, and down-to-earth. When no
one else is listening, Gamaliel organizers may rail at 'racism,' 'sexism,'
and 'oppressive corporate systems,' but when speaking to their blue-collar
followers, they describe their plans as 'common sense solutions for working
families.'

If anyone should doubt Obama's debt to Saul Alinsky, they might ponder this
encomium from no less an authority than Alinsky's own son. In a letter to
the Boston Globe, L. David Alinsky wrote of his father's influence at the
Democratic Convention:

All the elements were present: the individual stories told by real
people of their situation and hardships, the packed-to-the rafters crowd,
the crowd's chanting of key phrases and names, the action on the spot of
texting and phoning to show instant support and commitment to jump into the
political battle, the rallying selections of music, the setting of the
agenda by the power people.

Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is
showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the
method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the
supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a
powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama
learned his lesson well.

Obama's questionable links to various radicals are now well-known: the black
power racists Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Fr. Michael Pfleger, the former
Weather Underground terrorism supporters Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn. On
CNN's Glenn Beck show a few days ago Jerome Corsi, author of Obama Nation,
observed:

Obama began his career, his coming out party in 1995, and Ayers and
Bernadine Dorn's home. And then for, you know, some 20 years, Obama has been
working with Ayers, certainly since 1995, on a series of foundations: the
Annenberg Foundation and the Woods Foundation. The boards of directors
together, or in the Annenberg Foundation, Ayers created it, and Obama was on
it. And together they spent the money of these foundations to implement
their radical socialist agenda.

As EM Forster wrote in a somewhat different context, only connect.

When Hillary Clinton was fighting Obama for the Democratic candidacy, her
camp implied that the party would be making a terrible mistake in selecting
Obama because, unlike centrist Hillary, he was a left-winger. But Hillary is
an even more fervent Alinsky acolyte. In their book The Shadow Party, David
Horowitz and Glenn Poe recount how Hillary first met Alinsky through a
left-wing church group to which she belonged in high school, and stayed
close to him until his death. Indeed, so impressed was she with his beliefs
that she wrote a 75-page salute to him in her senior thesis at Wellesley
College in 1969, which contained excerpts of the not-yet published Rules for
Radicals. She wrote:

If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be
social revolution. Ironically, this is not a disjunctive projection if
considered in the tradition of Western democratic theory. In the first
chapter it was pointed out that Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent
of a dangerous socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared --
just as Eugene Debs or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared,
because each embraced the most radical of political faiths -- democracy.

That's not democracy as we know it, more a Marxist conception of people
power. On FrontPage, Perazzo writes:

During her senior year, Hillary was offered a job by Alinsky but chose
instead to enrol at Yale Law School. Alinsky's teachings, however, would
remain close to her heart throughout her adult life. According to a
Washington Post report, 'As first lady, Clinton occasionally lent her name
to projects endorsed by the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), the Alinsky
group that had offered her a job in 1968. She raised money and attended two
events organized by the Washington Interfaith Network, an IAF affiliate.'

Alinsky was a radical straight out of the Gramsci playbook. In both America
and Britain, Gramsci's acolytes have been conducting a decades-long march
through the institutions. In Britain, they have substantially achieved their
aim of subverting western morality and changing the face of British society.
No political party stands against this. In the US, they have made huge
inroads but haven't yet won. With Palin on one side and Obama on the other,
it is now clear that this US presidential election has taken the culture war
to the gates of the White House itself.

__._,_.___
Messages<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZWtlaHQ5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNtc2dzBHN0aW1lAzEyMjM0ODE2MjQ->
 [image: Yahoo!
Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbGt0cnRlBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzQ4MTYyNA-->
Change settings via the
Web<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJnOXQ4ZnNzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNzdG5ncwRzdGltZQMxMjIzNDgxNjI0>(Yahoo!
ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily
Digest<[EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Digest>|
Switch
format to Traditional<[EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Traditional>
Visit Your Group
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJldnVvamIzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNocGYEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzQ4MTYyNA-->|
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>| Unsubscribe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Visit Your Group
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJmaWxwdWQ2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyMjM0ODE2MjQ->
 Yahoo! News

Get it all 
here<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13o0o90of/M=493064.12016309.12445701.8674578/D=groups/S=1705323667:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1223488824/L=/B=84E8DELaX9Y-/J=1223481624699823/A=3848627/R=0/SIG=10obc6i69/*http://news.yahoo.com/>

Breaking news to

entertainment news
 Yahoo! Groups

w/ John 
McEnroe<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13ob2aqmg/M=493064.12016283.12445687.8674578/D=groups/S=1705323667:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1223488824/L=/B=9IE8DELaX9Y-/J=1223481624699823/A=5202322/R=0/SIG=11aijbghb/*http://new.groups.yahoo.com/allbrangroup>

Join the All-Bran

Day 10 Club.
 Yahoo! Groups

Real Food 
Group<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13ojtsfhk/M=493064.12016243.13036160.8674578/D=groups/S=1705323667:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1223488824/L=/B=9YE8DELaX9Y-/J=1223481624699823/A=5379228/R=0/SIG=11gatb1qb/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/hellmanns/>

Share recipes

and favorite meals.
.

__,_._,___



-- 
*~@):~{>



-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to