So you believe there are Mathematical equations which explain the
Markets?


On Oct 9, 11:42 pm, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again no data, no emperical evidence. Marx provided mathematical data
> for every single one of his theroies so they could be tested and
> questioned. He attempts no such thing.
>
> On Oct 10, 1:46 pm, "M.A. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Adam Smith and Karl Marx's basic and monumental (in consequences) 
> > errorSeptember 5, 2007 9:28 PM by Juan Fernando Carpio
> > What could these two thinkers, considered to be opposites, have in common? 
> > It turns out that Karl Marx inherits from Adam Smith a very basic error, 
> > one which has monumental consequences and has changed the world forever.
> > Adam Smith tells us in his famous treatise on the wealth of nations that in 
> > primitive conditions or small towns, those who would go to the market to 
> > sell their produce, cattle or manufacturing obtained salaries (wages) from 
> > their neighbors in the process. Salaries? Grave error.
> > What is obtained by someone who moves from agricultural self-sufficiency to 
> > the market is not a salary but rather a gain or a loss. Gains and losses 
> > are obtained by entrepreneurs. By definition, then, this could be a farmer 
> > or any independent professional in a city.
> > A salary does not make an appearance until the role of the capitalist also 
> > appears. The capitalist is the person which takes previously produced 
> > resources and risks them. He is the one who buys or pays for a good or 
> > service to later sell something that is greater than the sum of the parts. 
> > And this can only be determined if the product is sold: this is the only 
> > signal, a signal that is lacking in totalitarian countries, that society is 
> > creating aggregate value. Smith errs greatly when he calls salaries that 
> > which entrepreneurs obtain when they trade in the city plaza. It is not 
> > until one person hires another, at a fixed, regular rate, that a salary 
> > exists. We can call this the pact of capitalism because it implies that the 
> > employee is now part of the capitalist's entrepreneurial risk. In exchange, 
> > the employee receives a fixed income (daily, monthly, etc.), a salary.
> > Salaried employees have no possibility of gains, but --most importantly-- 
> > are free from losses. Indeed, they have a better chance of receiving income 
> > than the capitalist. The farmer, for example, must pay the salaries of his 
> > workers even if there has been a frost the day before harvest. He cannot 
> > burden them with a loss. Nor can he, to be fair, share with them the gains. 
> > A pharmaceutical company will sell its products four or five years after 
> > the initial idea of creating a new product. In the meantime, it will have 
> > to pay salaries to hundreds, even thousands, of people. That the salary is 
> > payed now is not contingent on future sales.
> > Thus, the problem, brilliantly taught to us by Prof. George Reisman, is 
> > that the error shared by Smith and Marx permitted the idea that to obtain 
> > gains --the famous exploitative "surplus"-- capitalists had to keep a bit 
> > of each employee's salary. In reality, value is created by whomever imparts 
> > vision, risks resources and recognizes opportunities, all while creating 
> > regular income to others in the process. Capitalism creates a worldwide 
> > middle class. Before capitalists, everyone had to fully assume all of the 
> > risk of a given activity. Now, however, we can delegate risk to those who 
> > are more ambitious and capable in the entrepreneurial game and at the end 
> > of the month, we all receive a paycheck. This is infinitely more productive 
> > and effective and, ultimately, eliminates poverty.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to