From: Travis
Subject: new from CitizenWarrior.com...

Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008,

   new from CitizenWarrior.com... <http://www.citizenwarrior.com/>

Waging Jihad by Gaining
Concessions<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CitizenWarrior/~3/415050849/waging-jihad-by-gaining-concessions.html>

Posted: 08 Oct 2008 01:46 PM CDT
<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__hspjzfC024/SOaO8iKKRNI/AAAAAAAAAbA/o4IHbAjydd8/s1600-h/muslims-protest-cartoons-ny.jpg>IF
YOUR GOAL was the eventual overthrow of the government and establishing Shari'a
Law <http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/sharia-law.html> as the law of
the land, but you didn't have a large enough majority to do it by voting or
by force, how could you do it? One good way would be to keep pressing for
small, incremental concessions <http://concess.blogspot.com/>. And when you
gain one, to hold it, and try to gain another.

And if you were using this strategy, what is the first concession you'd try
to gain? I think it would be to establish laws and cultural norms that
prohibit criticism of your group or its goals in speech or writing. This
could effectively prevent an organized effort to block the next concessions
you try to gain.

I believe that is exactly what Muslims are trying to do.

Here are a few recent examples:

1. Giving in to political pressure by Muslims and their supporters, a
National Counterterrorism Center memorandum prohibited the use of terms such
as "Jihad," "Islamist," and
"mujahedeen."<http://concess.blogspot.com/2008/09/counterterrorism-concedes-to-political.html>

2. The United Nations General Assembly is considering a resolution sponsored
by the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference in an attempt to
"mainstream" prohibitions on any speech that could be considered critical of
Islam<http://concess.blogspot.com/2008/09/will-un-muzzle-critics-of-islam.html>
.

3. Told by Muslims it could incite acts of violence, Random House decided
not to publish a book on Mohammad — after it had already bought the
rights<http://concess.blogspot.com/2008/09/random-house-concedes.html>
.

All three are Muslim attempts to accomplish the same goal: To hamper a
non-Muslim's ability to criticize Islam publicly. Every totalitarian state
that ever ruled a nation has done the same thing, and did it first. If you
can't criticize something in public, you are left with your private thoughts
and your few intimate friends. Are you the only ones who think this way? You
don't know. Silencing criticism isolates the dissenters. And it prevents
important public discussions from taking place.

Silencing criticism makes it possible for other concessions to be gained
without effective opposition.

Earnest Muslims are using every method they can think of to shut down
criticism and free speech. They legally lobby politicians and media
outlets<http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4995/102/>,
pressuring them to silence or fire someone who criticized Islam. They
slander anyone who criticizes Islam by calling them
"Islamophobic<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/islamophobia-is-ad-hominem-logical.html>"
or "racist<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/11/critique-of-pure-islam.html>."
They bring lawsuits against people even if they know they will not win
because the bad press is damaging enough. And they riot in the streets.
After a Dutch newspaper published a cartoon depicting Mohammad, Muslims
rioted all over Europe, leaving 187 people dead and making publishers think
twice about publishing something critical to Islam again.

And this aggressive religion will keep pushing unless we stop it. A
sufficient number of them will not try to be fair, will not try to
"assimilate" into the European or American culture, and will never let up on
the pressure to take over. It is their religious
duty<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/09/islams-relentless-encroachment.html>
.

The way to stop its spread without being cruel or violent is to establish
the policy: No more concessions to
Islam<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/08/concession-stand.html>
.

I once had a job working for a seminar company. My job was to call people
who had taken an introductory seminar and convince them to take the main
seminar we were selling. I was given a stack of cards participants had
filled out at the introductory seminar and I was told how to handle the
calls: "If they give you a definite 'no,' throw the card away. Otherwise put
it here and we'll call them again later."

And we would keep calling these people, harassing them for years because
those people were too nice to simply say, "I am not interested." People
would say, "I don't know, let me think about it." They would say all kinds
of things other than "no." I could hear in their voices that most of them
really wanted to say no, but they wouldn't. I felt sorry for these people,
and yet I couldn't help but think they were stupid. Why not be firm? Why not
be honest? It would save them a lot of stress. If only they knew my
instructions, they would have said no firmly right up front.

But the thing is, most of us are used to dealing with people who will not
exploit our "niceness." We deal with fair, considerate people almost all the
time, and our ways of dealing with fair people work very well. I'm assuming
you are a fair person. What do you do? If someone gave you a "socially
acceptable" excuse like "I'll think about it," you would let them bow out,
wouldn't you? You wouldn't ignore their signals and keep pushing.

But here's what we all have to learn sooner or later: For people who ignore
your signals and keep pushing, you had better develop a different approach —
an approach with more firmness and strength, an approach that protects
yourself and defends your interests.

The same goes for dealing with an aggressive religion. Have you ever had a
couple of Jehovah's Witnesses come to your door? Nice people. But if you
show the slightest interest, you'll be stuck at the door all day talking to
them about their religion. They are relentless, and to deal with it, you had
better be firm. If you say, "I'm busy right now," they will say, "That's
okay, when would be a good time to come back?"

Islam operates much the same, except on a much larger scale with a political
agenda. Islam is pressing for concessions
<http://concess.blogspot.com/>constantly, trying to find the
weaknesses, trying to find the cracks, the
loopholes, and it will keep pushing until it accomplishes its goal: A world
in which every country is ruled by Shari'a
law<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/sharia-law.html>
.

This is not one of those problems that will go away by itself. It is up to
us to be firm. They are not going to stop on their own. They must be stopped
by us.

 <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/CitizenWarrior?a=Ogg0M>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/CitizenWarrior?a=QXdiM>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/CitizenWarrior?a=RI7nm>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/CitizenWarrior?a=Qjtim>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/CitizenWarrior?a=Qjtim>

  You are subscribed to email updates from Citizen
Warrior<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/>
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe
now<http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailunsub?id=8777108&key=ubtaDcGMMZ>
. Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner Inbox too full? [image:
(feed)]<http://feeds.feedburner.com/CitizenWarrior>
Subscribe <http://feeds.feedburner.com/CitizenWarrior> to the feed version
of Citizen Warrior in a feed reader. If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal
mail, write to: Citizen Warrior, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor,
Chicago IL USA 60610



-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to