bwahahahahaha.  what a load

On Oct 10, 8:24 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> McCain-Palin campaign’s attacks on Obama: a whiff of fascism
> By Bill Van Auken, Socialist Equality Party candidate for vice
> president
> 10 October 2008
> Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author
>
> Faced with dwindling poll numbers and an increasingly hostile
> political environment created by the economy’s dizzying downward
> spiral, the Republican campaign of John McCain and Sarah Palin has
> responded with a virulently right-wing appeal directed to the most
> politically backward layers in America.
>
> Campaign rallies for the Republican presidential and vice-presidential
> candidates have taken on an increasingly angry and even violent tone.
>
> Virulent denunciations of Democratic presidential candidate Barack
> Obama delivered by Palin at campaign rallies in Florida this week were
> met with shouts from the crowd of “treason” and, in one case, “kill
> him.”
>
> At an event in New Mexico, McCain delivered a stock rhetorical line
> aimed at invoking fears of the Democratic candidate: “Who is Barack
> Obama?” Without missing a beat, a shout came back from the audience:
> “terrorist.”
>
> The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank reported from a campaign rally in
> Clearwater, Florida in which the crowd, inspired by Palin’s attacks on
> the media, turned on reporters shouting abuse and waving sticks.
> “Others hurled obscenities at a camera crew,” Milbank recounted. “One
> supporter shouted a racial epithet at an African-American sound
> man ... and told him, ‘Sit down boy.’”
>
> Last February, McCain felt compelled to disassociate himself from a
> right-wing talk radio announcer who, in introducing the Republican
> candidate, referred to his Democratic rival as “Barack Hussein Obama,”
> with the accent on the middle name. Now the reference has become
> routine at Republican rallies, feeding into a general theme of the
> campaign that the Democratic senator from Illinois not only cannot be
> trusted, but is a potential terrorist, and making a barely concealed
> appeal to racism.
>
> “Think how you’ll feel on November 5 if you wake up in the morning and
> see the news that Barack Obama—that Barack Hussein Obama—is the
> president-elect of the United States,” Lehigh County Republican Party
> chairman Bill Platt declared in a warm-up speech for Sarah Palin in
> Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. The remark was met with loud boos.
>
> The atmosphere in these Republican events resembles more and more that
> of a lynch mob. And the continuous attempts to paint Obama as a
> “traitor” and “terrorist” have the potential of inciting real
> violence, including attempts on the Democratic candidate’s life.
>
> At the center of this extreme right-wing turn in the Republican
> campaign strategy is a McCarthyite smear campaign linking Obama to
> William Ayers, a former member of the 1960s-era Weather Underground
> group, who today holds the title of “distinguished professor” of
> education at the University of Illinois at Chicago and is a liberal
> reformist.
>
> The McCain campaign unveiled a 90-second Internet campaign ad that
> rehashes the fact that Ayers hosted an event in his home when Obama
> was running for state senator in 1995 and that the two subsequently
> served together on the board of a non-profit organization.
>
> Cutting back and forth between photos of Obama and Ayers, it concludes
> with the narrator’s ominous sounding voice-over: “Obama’s friendship
> with terrorist Ayers isn’t the issue. The issue is Barack Obama’s
> judgment and candor. When Obama just says, ‘This is a guy who lives in
> the neighborhood,’ Americans says, ‘Where’s the truth, Barack?’ Barack
> Obama, too risky for America.”
>
> McCain echoed the same witch-hunting theme virtually verbatim at a
> campaign event in Waukesha, Wisconsin on Thursday: “Look, we don’t
> care about an old washed-up terrorist and his wife, who still, at
> least on Sept. 11, 2001, said he still wanted to bomb more. That’s not
> the point here. The point is Senator Obama said he was just a guy in
> the neighborhood. We know that’s just not true. We need to know the
> full extent of the relationship because of whether Senator Obama is
> telling the truth to the American people or not. That’s the question.”
>
> This thoroughly reactionary campaign, based on half-truths and
> innuendo, has been dutifully echoed by the mass media, with the New
> York Times publishing a front-page article on the Obama-Ayers
> connection last week, MSNBC running an investigative report on the
> subject and Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News making it the overriding
> political story each and every day.
>
> Ayers—referred to by the McCain campaign as “terrorist Ayers,” as if
> it were some military title—is, it deserves pointing out, a private
> citizen with no connection to Obama’s presidential campaign. He was
> never convicted of any crime nor charged with anyone’s death.
>
> Yet, the clear aim of the Republican campaign is to link him—and by
> association, Obama—to the terrorist attacks of September 11, thereby
> painting the Democratic candidate as a traitor and unfit for office.
>
> The Weather Underground, the group in which Ayers was a leading
> figure, emerged out of the mass opposition to the Vietnam War that saw
> millions of Americans take to the streets to demand an end to US
> military slaughter.
>
> The group expressed the frustration and disorientation of a section of
> the protesters who, despairing of the possibility of winning the
> American working class to the struggle against war and capitalism and
> influenced by the retrograde theories of Maoism, turned to what they
> saw as a more radical form of protest, involving isolated bombings.
>
> During a period in which the US war machine was responsible for
> killing over 3 million Vietnamese, the Weather Underground’s
> activities cost a total of three lives, all of them members of the
> group itself, who were killed in an accidental explosion.
>
> Part of the McCain campaign’s focus on this issue is aimed at
> demonizing the mass opposition that helped to force an end to the
> Vietnam War and rehabilitating the war itself. Only in this context
> can one understand the incongruous accusation by McCain—the former
> fighter pilot shot down while bombing heavily populated areas of Hanoi—
> that Obama is guilty of associating with someone involved in the
> “bombing of innocent civilians.”
>
> The inability of the Obama campaign to mount a direct and forceful
> response to this diatribe is bound up with its essential acceptance of
> this version of the Vietnam War, expressed in the Democratic
> candidate’s continuous “honoring” of McCain’s military service. The
> Democrats, no less than the Republicans, are determined to put behind
> them the so-called “Vietnam syndrome,” a euphemism for the enduring
> hostility of the American people to sacrificing the lives of its youth
> in wars of aggression.
>
> While essentially cowing in the face of the Republican smear campaign
> over Ayers, the Democrats have done nothing to expose the real dangers
> represented by the political forces to which their Republican rivals
> are now making such a direct appeal.
>
> The nature of these political layers emerges clearly in the
> associations of their vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, who
> was picked for her ability to “energize the base,” i.e., whip up the
> Republican right.
>
> Her husband was a member, and she at least a political sympathizer, of
> the Alaska Independence Party (AIP), an outfit that called for the
> secession of Alaska from the union and formed the Alaskan chapter of
> the Constitution Party, an extreme right-wing organization advocating
> Christian theocratic rule in America. Its founder, Joe Vogler, was
> killed in 1993 in what was described by the media as a “plastic-
> explosives sale gone bad.”
>
> The politics of the AIP paralleled that of the right-wing militia
> movement that gave rise to such elements as Timothy McVeigh and Terry
> Nichols, the authors of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that claimed
> the lives of 168 people.
>
> Moreover, Palin’s central appeal is based on her hard-line anti-
> abortion position, embraced by the Christian right and an anti-
> abortion movement that has given rise to the largest share of
> terrorist attacks carried out on American soil over the past two
> decades, including murders of health care practitioners, bombings,
> arsons, assaults and threats of violence.
>
> Yet neither the Democratic Party nor the media has shown an
> inclination to cast any light on these relations, much less subject
> them to the kind of front-page treatment given to the four-decades-old
> exploits of William Ayers and his tenuous connections to Obama.
>
> The role of the Christian right and of semi-fascistic elements within
> the Republican Party remains the great unmentionable in American
> politics. They are accorded political protection and legitimacy
> precisely for the role they play in diverting the anger and
> frustration of sections of the population into reactionary channels
> that serve to prop up the ruling establishment.
>
> The right-wing campaign presently being waged by the Republican Party
> has ominous implications. While it is highly questionable whether it
> will shift votes from Obama to McCain, it is serving to mobilize the
> most reactionary political forces and whip them to a fever pitch.
>
> These forces will not go away after the November election. Given an
> Obama victory at the polls, they will be utilized to place continuous
> pressure on the incoming administration, driving it ever further
> towards the right.
>
> Moreover, under conditions in which the immense crisis of American
> capitalism will inevitably produce explosive mass social struggles,
> the political sentiments to which the Republicans are appealing today
> will tomorrow form the ideological basis for fascistic movements aimed
> against the working class.
>
> The Democrats’ inability and unwillingness to answer the attacks
> coming from the McCain-Palin campaign demonstrates the impossibility
> of countering this threat from the right by voting for Obama. It
> requires, above all, the political mobilization of the working class
> through the building of an independent party fighting for its own
> interests on the basis of a socialist program. This is the alternative
> fought for solely by the Socialist Equality Party.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to