Guess you don't have to own much Wealth when the Government will give
you everything you need to survive...


On Oct 12, 3:32 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You talk about all these programs yet the bottom 40% of the American
> population owns just 0.2% of the wealth ( while the richest 1% have
> more wealth than the bottom 90%)--they are really living it up on
> government handouts, which incidently are taxpayers funds, they are
> not the governments funds.
>
> You have really been sucked in by the a vile propaganda campaign that
> is right up clueless MJ's alley
> On Oct 12, 6:01 pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > This writer forgot about welfare, food stamps, free meals at schools
> > and hundreds of other programs.
>
> > On Oct 11, 11:10 pm, "M.A. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > We're all socialists nowby Paul Mulshine
> > > October 11, 2008 1:43PM
> > > I've noticed lately that a lot of people seem to have discovered that 
> > > Barack Obama is a socialist.
> > > There's a lot of that going around.
> > > Socialism, I mean.
> > > The only politician that I know of on the national scene who is 
> > > definitely not a socialist is Texas congressman Ron Paul. And look where 
> > > that got him. During the presidential primary campaign Paul was treated 
> > > as a laughingstock by his fellow Republicans for such stances as his call 
> > > for young people to be permitted to opt out of Social Security.
> > > Paul's having the last laugh these days. As you can see inthis clip, the 
> > > entire U.S. economy is now socialist thanks to the big corporate bailout, 
> > > says Dr. Paul.
> > > And then there is the unpleasant fact that every senior citizen in 
> > > America is what my Aussie friends used to call "a dole bludger," someone 
> > > who takes welfare without working.
> > > One such apparent dole bludgerheld forthat a recent McCain rally in 
> > > Wisconsin. The old codger worked himself up into a frenzy that even the 
> > > hot-tempered McCain might envy, screaming "I'm mad, I'm really mad!" and 
> > > then shouting, "And what's going to surprise ya, is it's not the economy, 
> > > it's the socialists taking over our country."
> > > The old coot made it clear that the hated socialists are the Democrats. 
> > > But assuming he was over 65, which he certainly appeared to be, the guy 
> > > is receiving the benefit of at least two socialist programs. One, of 
> > > course, is Social Security. There's a reason they called it "social" 
> > > security and not Capitalist Security. It's a welfare program and the 
> > > current codgers are getting a free ride paid for by working Americans. 
> > > True, they paid into it, but anyone who lives a normal life span will get 
> > > out a lot more than he or she put in.
> > > And then there's Medicare. The current crop of seniors paid a pittance 
> > > into it during their working years, but they now have the benefit of a 
> > > system of socialized medicine till the day they die.
> > > Does this guy really want McCain to fight socialism in America?
> > > Imagine McCain told this guy he was absolutely right and as of January 
> > > President McCain would end Social Security and Medicare and pay back to 
> > > senior citizens the amount they paid in, with interest. By February, this 
> > > geezer would be at a rally demanding to have his Medicare coverage 
> > > restored.
> > > The truth is, Americans love socialism. They'd better. This is a 
> > > socialist country. Here's an interestingarticlethat compares our 
> > > government-funded health care systems, primarily Medicare and Medicaid, 
> > > with other countries:
> > > "The average rich-country government spends 6.7 percent of GDP on health; 
> > > America's 6.8 percent is very slightly higher. The national health 
> > > systems of Canada and Britain cost about 6.9 percent of GDP, and that of 
> > > Australia 6.4 percent. Germany's government spends the most on health 
> > > care at 8.9 percent of GDP, followed by Norway, Sweden, France, and 
> > > Denmark."
> > > The big difference, of course, is that in most of those countries the 
> > > socialized system covers everyone, while our socialized system covers 
> > > just the poor and the elderly. Oh yeah, don't let me forget government 
> > > workers. They have a system of guaranteed benefits and early retirement 
> > > that the typical Brit or Swede would envy.
> > > So our system is socialism. It's just an inept form of socialism. And 
> > > it's also an unsupportable form. The baby-boomer retirement was going to 
> > > bankrupt us even before the recent market meltdown. Now we could be on 
> > > the verge of a slide into Third-World status. I've been to countries 
> > > where you need to carry a backpack just for the bills needed to buy a 
> > > beer. It's not a pretty sight.
> > > The only way to prevent that would be to take the harsh medicine that Dr. 
> > > Paul offered us during the primary season. But not a lot of Americans 
> > > want that prescription, and I suspect the old crank in this video would 
> > > be among the last to down a dose of it.
> > > NOTE: Michael Cannon of the Cato Institute just sent me a link tothis 
> > > paperin which he argues that Obama's plan is socialized medicine, as is 
> > > Medicare. He doesn't deal with McCain's plan, but it is slightly less 
> > > socialist than 
> > > Obama's.http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2008/10/were_all_socialists_now....Hide
> > >  quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to