mark,
Where did i say I hated the Bush rebates? I DID say it was political
grand-standing and wouldn't have any long-term positive economic
effect on the nation as a whole. What IS it with you clowns.? The ONlY
way you know how to describe anything is in terms of either "LOVE" OR
"HATE"?
WORK ON YOUR COMMUNICATION SKILLS LAD.
On Oct 13, 4:13 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and now the dems want to have another economic stimulus package. poor
> holly is caught in a time warp, again. he hated the Bush rebates, yet
> his fellow losers want to do the same thing. and it was the dems who
> voted for the rebates. holly and his selective memory.
>
> On Oct 13, 11:08 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > BS Holly. I opposed the "rebates" and the bailout. And i still do. I am
> > opposed to gov't interferring in free private enterprise except for minor
> > necessary regulation.
>
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > > And yet neither of you clowns had a problem with Bush's "rebates" or a
> > > $700 billion PLUS welfare check to Wall Street and the financial
> > > industry.
>
> > > On Oct 13, 5:55 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > not to mention taxing small businesses out of existence.
>
> > > > On Oct 13, 6:54 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > But B-HO fails to mention that he will let the bush tax cuts expire
> > > which
> > > > > will give 100% of taxpayers a tax increase.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:27 AM, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Barack Obama says he will give 95 percent of all American workers a
> > > > > > tax cut but does not mention that his plan would send checks to tens
> > > > > > of millions of tax filers who pay no personal income taxes -
> > > > > > payments
> > > > > > that critics say look "suspiciously like welfare."
>
> > > > > > Mr. Obama's campaign promise, which he has repeated in his speeches
> > > > > > and in the presidential debates, stems from his "Making Work Pay"
> > > > > > tax
> > > > > > cut that will give a $500 refundable tax credit to every worker or
> > > > > > $1,000 to each working couple. But because this provision in his
> > > > > > economic-recovery plan is "refundable," a large number of middle- to
> > > > > > lower-income workers who have no income-tax liability after taking
> > > tax
> > > > > > credits and deductions the that Internal Revenue Service allows,
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > be given the equivalent of the tax cut in the form of direct
> > > > > > payments
> > > > > > from the U.S. Treasury - funded by higher-income taxpayers.
>
> > > > > > Because the IRS says that nearly 46 million tax filers - one-third
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > all filers - had no tax liability in 2006, there is the question of
> > > > > > how millions of Americans can receive an income "tax cut" when they
> > > > > > pay no taxes.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
