Doesn't surprise me one bit that you do not get it holly...

I have a problem with Democrats making money to get re-Elected from
these people who have screwed the American People.

Obviously you have no problem with those you Elect making their money
from those who have screwed this Nation.


On Oct 13, 5:52 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gaar,
>
> We agree they are not making any laws.
> Never heard a conservative Republican whine about people making money
> before.
> They have a right to try to "affect the System" overall, as do you.
> What the fuck do you think politics is all about? It's about trying
> "to affect the system overall" in a matter you believe to be positive.
> This is news to you?
>
> On Oct 13, 7:17 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The people who were running the place and making MILLIONS doing it
> > didn't break any Laws either...
>
> > The question is not breaking any Laws, it is their ability to judge
> > their OWN actions and how they might affect the System overall,
> > especially in the long run.
>
> > On Oct 13, 5:13 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > mark,
>
> > > I'm in no mood for your idiocy. Sen. Obama has done nothing illegal in
> > > his past or current associations with ACORN. A great many people in
> > > this country consider having a history of supportting and/or working
> > > with ACORN a definate positive.
> > > You apparantly don't and the only response I have for you is "big
> > > fucking deal".
> > > Now, do be so kind as to piss off.
>
> > > On Oct 13, 4:10 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > nobama was a trainer for acorn
> > > > nobama was a lawyer for acorn
> > > > nobamas campaign has given acorn thousands of dollars
> > > > nobama has stated acorn will help him set his agenda
> > > > and nobamas website has taken down his denials about his ties to acorn
> > > > nobama and acorn are attached at the hip.
>
> > > > On Oct 13, 3:39 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 13, 12:26 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > What you,
> > > > > > and others, are doing is simply attempting to attach Sen. Obama's 
> > > > > > name
> > > > > > to a negative in any fashion that you can.
>
> > > > > If it is "negative" to point out his Political and Personal
> > > > > relationships with many people over his "career", how do we get to
> > > > > Judge the Man's Character and Judgement before we decide if he should
> > > > > be President?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to