Done right, they can be beneficial. On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They have them up here in Dallas (without ads) and generally they are > on the busiest, most dangerous highways. They're also up fairly high, > so it is a bit of a distraction to read them. > > Your govt at work. > > I do recall one the other day, it was for an "Amber Alert" and said > something like "Missing Elderly Vehicle TX1234" Of course they were > referring to the license on the vehicle the missing person was > driving, but I thought, "someone's lost an elderly car?" > > On Oct 17, 2:45 pm, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And they will soon forget to look at all and miss the important info they > > were put there for in the first place. more accidents, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And in California of course. I imagine after a while, after being > > > pummeled with ads each day, people won't even look at the signs > > > anymore (notwithstanding the Shakira concert ads). > > > > > On Oct 17, 2:21 pm, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Only very ignorant money hungry libtards could come up with an idea > like > > > > this. it should be called "How to cause more highway accidents". > > > > From: Travis > > > > Date: Fri, Oct 17, 2008 > > > > Subject: Calif. mulls ads on road alert signs - USATODAY.com > > > > > > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-10-16-highway-ads_N.htm?csp=34 > > > > > > -- > > > > *~@):~{> > > > > -- > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
