Gaar, Because you have serious control issues?
On Oct 21, 2:05 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And why do you think I explained it would round to 55% to 45%? > > On Oct 20, 10:24 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > Why in the fuck do you think I used the word approx. (or the > > abbreviation of it) in the first fucking place? > > > On Oct 21, 12:10 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > No... > > > > It is currently, approximately 53.6% Democratic and 46.4% Republican. > > > > And also the worse rated Congress in History. > > > > On Oct 20, 8:30 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > Is that same Congress composed of APPROX. 50% Republicans or is it > > > > NOT? > > > > > On Oct 17, 1:36 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The one with the lowest rating in History, controlled by Democrats... > > > > > > That one holly. > > > > > > On Oct 17, 9:52 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ramakazee, > > > > > > > You refer to the approval rating for the Cobgress that is composed > > > > > > of > > > > > > approx. 50% Republicans? THAT the Congress you mean? > > > > > > > On Oct 17, 11:38 am, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorta, remarkably a Dem controlled House and Senate screwed it up > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > under 2 years. > > > > > > > > Sweet Jesus, you guys work fast. > > > > > > > > PS. How's that approval rating going by the way? > > > > > > > > PSS. And you want a Dem as president on top of all this crap? > > > > > > > > On Oct 17, 11:34 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Phil, > > > > > > > > > Guess the conservative Republicans shouldn't have fucked up so > > > > > > > > much > > > > > > > > over the past 8 years. Time to pay the piper. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 17, 10:12 am, Philobealo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White > > > > > > > > > House on > > > > > > > > > November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional > > > > > > > > > majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very > > > > > > > > > close to > > > > > > > > > it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would > > > > > > > > > become like > > > > > > > > > the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants. > > > > > > > > > > Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one > > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. > > > > > > > > > history. > > > > > > > > > Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they > > > > > > > > > haven't > > > > > > > > > since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > restoration of the activist government that fell out of > > > > > > > > > public favor > > > > > > > > > in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of > > > > > > > > > unchecked > > > > > > > > > left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand > > > > > > > > > what they > > > > > > > > > will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on. > > > > > > > > > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=rss_opini... > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
