http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/12/23/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations-of-2013/2/



*12/23/2013 @ 3:38PM |214,089 views *

*President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013*

By Ilya Shapiro

One of Barack Obama <http://www.forbes.com/profile/barack-obama/>’s chief
accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in
our public discourse.

Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by
talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by
blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document. And he’s been
most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to
“fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him. In its first term, the Administration launched
a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, with senior aide Dan Pfeiffer explaining that
“when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year,
President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not
allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

And so, as we reach the end of another year of political strife that’s
fundamentally based on clashing views on the role of government in society,
I thought I’d update a list I made two years ago and hereby present
President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations of 2013.

*1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps.* The Labor Department
announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the
healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own
insurance. This may have been sensible—insurers and employers need time to
comply with rapidly changing regulations—but changing the law requires
actual legislation.

*2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate.* The administration announced
via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the
requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying
insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the
cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of
the mandate itself.

*3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements.* The famous pledge that
“if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies
started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s
requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to
proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in
2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused
to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

*4. Exemption of Congress from Obamacare.* A little-known part of Obamacare
requires Congressmen and their staff to get insurance through the new
healthcare exchanges, rather than a taxpayer-funded program. In the quiet
of August, President Obama directed the Office of Personnel
Management<http://www.forbes.com/management/>to interpret the law to
maintain the generous congressional benefits.

*5. Expansion of the employer mandate penalty through IRS
regulation.*Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers
don’t provide
coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the
State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy.
No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges
are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to
create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the
IRS issued a rule ignoring that plain text and allowed subsidies (and
commensurate fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional
Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally-facilitated Exchange.”

*6. Political profiling by the IRS.* After seeing a rise in the number of
applications for tax-exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a “be on the
lookout” (“BOLO”) list to identify organizations engaged in political
activities. The list included words such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” and
“Israel”; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and
activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the
Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued through May
of this year.

*7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments.* Between January 2012 and June
2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s
extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to
property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to
tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that
federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush
and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous
rulings, respectively.

*8. Recess appointments.* Last year, President Obama appointed three
members of the National Labor Relations Board, as well as the head of the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, during what he considered to be a
Senate recess. But the Senate was still holding “pro forma” sessions every
three days—a technique developed by Sen. Harry Reid to thwart Bush recess
appointments. (Meanwhile, the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the CFPB,
provides that authority remains with the Treasury Secretary until a
director is “confirmed by the Senate.”) In January, the D.C. Circuit held
the NLRB appointments to be unconstitutional, which ruling White House
spokesman Jay Carney said only applied to “one court, one case, one
company.”

*9. Assault on free speech and due process on college campuses.* Responding
to complaints about the University of
Montana<http://www.forbes.com/colleges/the-university-of-montana/>’s
handling of sexual assault claims, the Department of
Education<http://www.forbes.com/education/>’s
Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, sent
the university a letter intended as a national “blueprint” for tackling
sexual harassment. The letter urges a crackdown on “unwelcome” speech and
requires complaints to be heard in quasi-judicial procedures that deny
legal representation, encourage punishment before trial, and convict based
on a mere “more likely than not” standard.

*10. Mini-DREAM Act.* Congress has shamelessly failed to pass any sort of
immigration reform, including for the most sympathetic victims of the
current non-system, young people who were brought into the country
illegally as children. Nonetheless, President Obama, contradicting his own
previous statements claiming to lack authority, directed the Department of
Homeland Security <http://www.forbes.com/security/> to issue work and
residence permits to the so-called Dreamers. The executive branch
undoubtedly has discretion regarding enforcement priorities, but granting
de facto green cards goes beyond a decision to defer deportation in certain
cases.

It was hard to limit myself to 10 items, of course—Obamacare alone could’ve
filled many such lists—but these, in my judgment, represent the chief
executive’s biggest dereliction this year of his duty to “preserve,
protect, and defend” the Constitution, and to “take care that the law be
faithfully executed.”

Alas, things may get worse before they get better. New presidential
“counselor” John Podesta’s belief in governance by fiat is no secret; in a
2010 report, he wrote that focusing on executive power “presents a real
opportunity for the Obama administration to turn its focus away from a
divided Congress and the unappetizing process of making legislative
sausage.”

Happy New Year!

*Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato
Institute and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review.*




__._,_.___





__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to