It appears that this Feminist is more a liberal politically correct  woman 
then being a Feminist when it comes to Islam.  The hypocrisy of  political 
correctness.
 
 
In a message dated 1/3/2014 8:13:54 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 








The Hypocrisy  of the Feminist Response to Islam’s Oppression of  Women 
Posted By  Robert Spencer On December 30, 2013  
Editor’s  Note: This is Part  III of an ongoing series by Robert Spencer 
highlighting human rights hypocrisy  and fraudulent peace activists. For Part 
I, see “_The Hypocrisy of the ‘Islamophobia’  Scam_ 
(http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/12/16/the-hypocrisy-of-the-islamophobia-scam/)
 ,” for Part II, 
see last week’s “_The Hypocrisy of the Fatwa Against  Terrorism_ 
(http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/12/24/the-hypocrisy-of-the-fatwa-against-terrorism/)
 
.” 
Concerned  about the Islamic oppression of women? The divine sanction for 
the beating of  women (Qur’an 4:34)? The commodification, the polygamy, the 
child marriage,  the female genital mutilation, the honor killing? Ah – that 
just confirms that  you’re a racist, bigoted Islamophobe – at least as far 
as the British feminist  writer _Laurie Penny_ 
(https://twitter.com/PennyRed)  is concerned. And Penny is by no  means alone: 
her article just provides 
a particularly egregious case study of  the general tolerance of Western 
feminists for Muslim  misogyny. 
“Islamophobes,”  wrote Penny with admirable certainty in the _Guardian_ 
(http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/22/this-isnt-feminism-its-is
lamophobia)  last week,  “could not care less about women of any creed or 
colour.” These wicked fellows  only criticize the Sharia mistreatment of 
Muslim women because of their  bigotry and hatred. According to Penny, 
“misogyny 
only matters when it isn’t  being done by white men.” Penny complains: 
As a person  who writes about women’s issues, I am constantly being told 
that Islam is the  greatest threat to gender equality in this or any other 
country – mostly by  white men, who always know best. This has been an 
extraordinary year for  feminism, but from the Rochdale grooming case to 
interminable debates over  whether traditional Islamic dress is “empowering” or 
otherwise, the rhetoric  and language of feminism has been co-opted by 
Islamophobes, who could not care  less about women of any creed or colour. 
How does  Laurie Penny know that those whom she tars as “Islamophobes” 
really don’t care  about women? Because, as you’ll see below, some baddies 
from the BNP and EDL  allegedly said some rude things. And that means that any 
critic of Islamic  gender oppression must be using feminism as a cover for 
his “hatred,” doncha  know. 
Penny grumbles  about a report from Student Rights, which she describes as “
a pressure group  not run by students,” that stooped to “vastly 
exaggerating a suggestion by  Universities UK that male and female students 
might be 
asked to sit separately  in some lectures led by Islamic guest speakers.” In 
the wake of this, she  said, “unfortunately, rightwing commentators and 
tabloids seized upon the  issue to imply that Islamic extremists are taking 
over 
the British  academy.” 
Whether or not  “Islamic extremists” are “taking over the British academy,”
 _there was talk about some Muslim  gatherings separating male and female 
students_ 
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/10468115/Universities-can-segregate-men-and-women-for-debates.html)
 . If some  
conservative group had done this, Laurie Penny would have been loudly  
outraged; 
but now she has branded those who are concerned about Muslim gender  
apartheid as bigots and hatemongers. If it is not permitted to speak out  
against 
this relatively small matter, will there be anyone left to speak out  against 
the oppression of women in Islam that is quite real?  Penny hates  and fears 
right-wingers far more than she does the Muslims who stone women to  death 
for adultery, mutilate their genitals, deny them the right to leave the  
house without permission from a male, and beat them when they displease  them. 
Oblivious to  the oppression she is enabling, Penny continues: 
It’s the  dishonesty that angers me most. It’s the hypocrisy of men 
claiming to stand  for women’s rights while appropriating our language of 
liberation to serve  their own small-minded agenda. Far-right groups like the 
English Defence  League and the British National party rush to condemn crimes 
against women  committed by Muslim men, while fielding candidates who make 
claims like “women  are like gongs – they need to be struck regularly”. 
Some of their  members tell me that since they are standing against the 
sexism of Muslim  barbarians, as a feminist I should be on their side. When I 
disagree, I am  invariably informed I deserve be shipped to Afghanistan and 
stoned to  death. 
I don’t think  Laurie Penny should be shipped to Afghanistan and stoned to 
death. I’m just  sorry that she doesn’t have more concern about women who 
are already in  Afghanistan, or Iran, or Sudan, and in danger of being stoned 
to death —  concern enough, at least, to avoid demonizing their  defenders. 
All this  concern for Muslim women, says Penny, is just a ruse “to justify 
imperialism  abroad and sexism at home.” How does she know this? Because 
Lord Cromer, a  lion of the British colonial period, criticized the wearing of 
the hijab by  Egyptian women and then came home and campaigned against women’
s suffrage.  Penny quotes Katharine Viner, another feminist writer, saying 
that Cromer  “wanted merely to replace eastern misogyny with western 
misogyny,” and adds:  “More than a century later, the same logic is used to 
imply 
that misogyny only  matters when it isn’t being done by white men.” 
Penny’s great  fallacy here is thinking that denying women the right to 
vote is equivalent to  stoning them to death, making them property of men, 
denying them inheritance  rights, and giving divine sanction to beating them. 
But Penny is  unconcerned about such matters. She is much more “infuriated 
by white men  using dog-whistle Islamophobia to derail any discussion of 
structural sexism.”  For “the people making these arguments don’t care about 
women. They care about  stoking controversy, attacking Muslims and shouting 
down feminists of all  stripes.” 
Shouting down  feminists? It seems as if it is Penny is the one doing all 
the shouting down,  denouncing the “western men” who “for decades” have “
hijacked the language of  women’s liberation to justify their Islamophobia.” 
Penny concludes darkly: “If  we care about the future of feminism, we cannot 
let them set the  agenda.” 
In reality, if  we care about Muslim women, we can’t let the Guardian or 
Laurie Penny  set the agenda. For the intent and effect of her criticism of 
the critics of  Islam’s mistreatment of women is quite insidious: those who do 
dare speak out  against Islam’s institutionalized, codified oppression of 
women will be  branded as “Islamophobes,” and the only misogny that doesn’t 
matter will be  that which is done by Muslim men. The victims will be, as 
ever, Muslim  women. 
  
____________________________________
 
Article  printed from PJ Lifestyle: http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle 
URL to  article: 
http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/12/30/the-hypocrisy-of-the-feminist-response-to-islams-oppression-of-women/
 



__._,_.___
 




__,_._,___







-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google  Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

*  Visit our other community at _http://www.PoliticalForum.com/_ 
(http://www.politicalforum.com/)  
*  It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the  latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message  because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To  unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email  to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to