How refreshing.....
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:06 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > *MIT Professor Exposes Climate Change Hysteria *by Mikael Thalen > January 17th, 2014 > Updated 01/17/2014 at 4:58 pm > > A leading climate change figure has come out against the government’s > continued and ridiculous climate change hysteria. > > > > * > http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=69016&siteSection=site_section_id&videoId=25546957 > <http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=69016&siteSection=site_section_id&videoId=25546957>*Speaking > in regards to Massachusetts’ new $50 million climate change proposal, MIT > Professor Richard Lindzen, a leading figure in the climate change movement, > pointed out the absurdity of blaming every weather event on global warming > and climate change. > > “The changes that have occurred due to global warning are too small to > account for,” Lindzen told WBZ-TV. “It has nothing to do with global > warming, it has to do with where we live.” > > Although supporting the theory of man-made global warming, Lindzen > admitted that rhetoric from the political class and green movement has been > nothing more than over-the-top “catastrophism.” > > “Even many of the people who are supportive of sounding the global warning > alarm, back off from catastrophism,” Lindzen said. “It’s the politicians > and the green movement that like to portray catastrophe.” > > Even more surprising, Lindzen goes on to point out the government’s > obvious use of climate change alarmism to push greater state control, even > warning over politicians’ use of “crony capitalism.” > > “Global warming, climate change, all these things are just a dream come > true for politicians. The opportunities for taxation, for policies, for > control, for crony capitalism are just immense, you can see their eyes > bulge,” Lindzen said. > > Lindzen has frequently been attacked by climate alarmists for refusing to > give into political pressures regarding climate sThe growing number of > failed predictions from the global warming crowd has only cooled the > public’s > belief<http://www.gallup.com/poll/153875/Worry-Water-Air-Pollution-Historical-Lows.aspx>in > recent years. > > From 2007 to 2009, Al Gore hysterically warned that the North Pole would > be completely “ice-free” by > 2013<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7139797.stm>. > Instead, 2013 experienced record breaking > cold<http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/07/30/1122-record-cold-temps-in-the-u-s-in-one-week/>and > major > growth in Arctic > ice<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/And-global-COOLING-Return-Arctic-ice-cap-grows-29-year.html> > . > > Similarly, Gore made desperate warnings over the danger of increased > hurricanes during the same time period. Soon after, climate scientists had > trouble explaining the record > low<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-30/no-atlantic-hurricane-by-august-in-first-time-in-11-years.html>hurricanes > that soon followed. > > In his 1992 book “Earth in the Balance,” Gore went on to claim that global > warming would soon wipe coastal areas of Florida off the map in as little > as a few decades. Sea level statistics taken 18 years later revealed Gore’s > predictions to be completely > inaccurate<http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/12/the_winner_of_this_years_best.html> > . > > White House Science Adviser John P. Holdren, who made failed predictions > of global cooling in his 1977 book Ecoscience, attempted to blame the > recent “polar vortex” on global warming. Researchers soon uncovered a 1974 > Time > Magazine<http://www.prisonplanet.com/1974-time-blames-polar-vortex-on-global-cooling-2014-time-blames-polar-vortex-on-global-warming.html>article > that blamed a cold polar vortex on global cooling instead. > > Climate change alarmists have become so crazed in their beliefs that some > have attempted to equate skepticism with > racism<http://www.prisonplanet.com/climate-change-skepticism-a-sickness-that-must-be-treated-says-professor.html>, > claiming any denial of global warming is a “sickness” in need of > “treatment.” > > Unsurprisingly, major environmental issues such as the ongoing Fukushima > nuclear disaster seem to be completely ignored by Gore and company. Given > the massive amount of money Al Gore has continued to > make<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/business/energy-environment/03gore.html?_r=4&;>from > generating climate fear, it seems unlikely that any real disaster > unable to generate cash will receive proper attention. > > http://www.storyleak.com/mit-professor-climate-change/#ixzz2rYrebrdI > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
