January 27, 2014

*Busted! The Democratic Party's Moral Superiority*

*By* *Michael Bargo Jr.* <http://www.americanthinker.com/michael_bargo_jr/>

Many analysts of national news media have noted that there is a double
standard with regard to how the media report
<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28764.html>the behavioral faux
pas of Republican versus Democratic politicians.

But there is a far more important difference between the two national
parties and their moral postures. This difference is revealed when one
compares the campaign rhetoric used by the DNC to the behavior of
Democratic officials at the local, state, and national levels once they
have achieved positions of power.

While Democrats have a set script with regard to campaign rhetoric -- they
demonize Republicans while claiming that only Democrats are concerned for
the needy and less privileged -- in order to understand their true
character, it is necessary to look at how they behave once they are in
power. This is most clearly revealed through how they respond to perceived
threats to their control of money.

Democrats have shown a consistent inability to balance budgets at the
local, state, and national level. And after creating a fiscal crisis,
Democrats always say that if they are not given more money "essential
services" will be cut back. This implies that they will make the voters
suffer if they are unable to persuade the GOP to give them more money by
raising the deficit ceiling; revealing that they practice moral blackmail
<http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/07/moral_extortion_and_blackmail_rhetoric.html>as
standard operating procedure. Last year President Obama went out of his way
to close off the WW II memorial
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2013/10/03/petty_obama_shuts_down-wwii_memorial_316999.html>to
visiting veterans.

Recently, Chicago's Mayor Emanuel, who worked in Obama's White House as
Chief of Staff, stated that if the city couldn't find money for police and
fire pensions "essential services" would be cut. He failed to explain why
those retired fire and policemen who receive pensions of over $70,000 a
year can't survive on $30K, the highest benefit received by social security
recipients. The pattern is clear: the middle class and poor are held
hostage in budget negotiations while those who work for government are not,
no matter how high their salaries and pensions may be.

Democrats, paradoxically, always want to punish the poor whenever they
don't get their way. And it's always about getting more money: they want
the debt limit raised or taxes increased.

Voters fail to understand the true meaning of this tactic. If Democrats
were really concerned for the poor, voters should expect them to say that
they will make any spending cuts necessary in order to preserve essential
services. They would bear any burden, climb any mountain, to make sure the
elderly and most needy do not lose their essential Federal support.
Instead, they hold the needy hostage to satisfy their insatiable lust for
power and money.

The major news media outlets fail to ask Democrats a simple question: why
not place a priority on maintaining benefits to the less privileged? Why do
they always want to maintain the high salaries and pensions of political
elites? It gives the impression that the Democratic Party is primarily
concerned with achieving political office so they can vote themselves and
their campaign contributors luxury levels of pay and pensions.

It's very difficult to find a social issue that President Obama has fought
over with the zeal with which he has attacked the fiscal cliff negotiations
or debt ceiling. There is no evidence that Congress needs to raise the debt
ceiling to help the most needy. After all, trillions of dollars of new debt
has resulted in nothing but failing schools, increased food stamp
dependency, and higher unemployment for the minorities of the U.S.

The notion that Democrats support labor unions has been challenged by the
fact that they have sponsored illegal immigration to the largest American
cities. This has caused union workers in the building trades, such as
carpentry, to lose jobs. This has been achieved by Democrats making
available to illegal immigrants all of the benefits that have previously
been offered only to
citizens<http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/02/how_democrats_sponsored_illegal_immigration.html>
.

The DNC has the cooperation of the national media to frame the situation in
such a way that the GOP will be seen as the cause of the suffering. But it
is always Democrats who frame the political choice as between increased
taxes and benefits, not the GOP. It's a credit to the rhetorical skill of
Democrats and the cooperation of the media, that Democrats are not seen as
the ones quick to cut services to the needy.

So they end up engaging in the very behavior they accuse the GOP of
practicing: cutting back on people programs in order to keep their money.
And their brand of the fiscal status quo endorses taxing the very working
class and poor they say they will support.

This indicates where their priorities and their morals lie. Morality, to
the Democratic Party, is a characteristic of the voters they can manipulate
and exploit as a bargaining tool in elections and fiscal cliff
negotiations, not a guideline for public policy.

Anyone who votes for Democrats should ask themselves how they would feel if
someone at their office constantly practiced the strategy of berating other
workers just to get promoted. And once they had the job, blamed others for
everything that went wrong. If this appears to be unseemly in the
workplace, then Democratic supporters should wonder why they accept it from
their Democratic political leaders.

Voters who believe that Democrats are the party of moral superiority should
ask themselves: under what conditions have Republicans threatened to remove
benefits?

This great contradiction, this great double standard, in which the
Democratic Party asks voters to make a distinction between the DNC and GOP
based on the immoral character of Republicans, while threatening to take
benefits and essential services away from the poor they were elected to
serve to protect their own funds, is an astounding example of
persuasiveness that functions beyond the constraints of reason.

It's based on an ancient and very unfortunate tendency of human beings to
see other groups as inferior to themselves, so as to rationalize the
exploitation of those groups. Historically this tendency has manifested
itself in genocide, slavery, and the economic oppression of others. The
suspension of reason by manipulation is what makes it possible, in this age
when politics has allegedly risen above biases based on race and
group-think, for one party to demonize another.

In the final analysis, the strategy employed by Democrats is one of social
domination derived from social derision. It is an unfortunate trait of
human nature for people to denigrate others. Further proof of the moral
bankruptcy of the Democratic Party lies in the fact that they have
aggressively chosen to employ this tactic.

In fact, this strategy has been used so consistently, that Democrats are
now predictable: they will threaten safety net programs whenever they
encounter resistance to a tax or national debt increase.

When American voters wake up to the true moral character of the Democratic
Party it will be a permanent and fateful day for the DNC, far more
devastating to the party than the ObamaCare fiasco, since the moral stature
of the Democrats depends on a deception that has been carried on for one
hundred years.




*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2014/01/busted_the_democratic_partys_moral_superiority.html
<http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2014/01/busted_the_democratic_partys_moral_superiority.html>*at
January 27, 2014 - 01:17:41 PM CST


__._,_.___





__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to