There are starving people in the U.S.?

Where?

On Oct 23, 3:17 pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are wrong about your facts. The obese population is killing itself
> and putting an immense burden upon healthcare. The ignorant are
> raising mutants.
>
> On Oct 23, 9:19 am, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yeah, and the fact is there are no "starving" people in the US. There
> > aren't. There are certainly hungry people, but no one (short of
> > neglect by a caretaker or mental defect) "starves" in the US.
>
> > And that says a lot I think.
>
> > On Oct 22, 4:42 pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The poor can avail themselves of food banks and many programs that
> > > favor their poverty. There are plenty of taxes- sometimes disguised as
> > > fees. Only taxes and death are certain- someone else said it. ?
>
> > > On Oct 22, 4:16 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > isn't it funny how the dems always seem to exclude their rich folk in
> > > > the mix. I guess if you are rich and a republican you aren't paying
> > > > enough, but if you are rich and a dem you pay too much. there should
> > > > be no income tax period. a ntional sales tax will solve all the
> > > > problems. the rich will pay more because they buy more expensive
> > > > products. the poor will pay also, but not as much. every person in
> > > > this country should pay taxes. everyone.
>
> > > > On Oct 22, 4:44 pm, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > There should be an evaluation of wealth, pensions, etc. re Social
> > > > > Security and Medicare- those over a certain figure should not receive
> > > > > benefits from those systems. We should all be glad that Social
> > > > > Security was not dumped into the stock market!
>
> > > > > On Oct 22, 2:31 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The largest outlays in our Budget are for "Entitlements", like 
> > > > > > Social
> > > > > > Security and Medicare...
>
> > > > > > How many Rich People do you suppose use those compared to the "Poor"
> > > > > > and Middle Class?
>
> > > > > > On Oct 22, 12:27 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I've read the below twice and I've yet to find a sentence that is
> > > > > > > accurate. The most claring inconsistency is "I see Congree 
> > > > > > > spending
> > > > > > > money to help the rich stay rich...."
>
> > > > > > > And then you blame the Reps for all of it.
>
> > > > > > > Errrr... check the Senate and House, lemme know what you find.
>
> > > > > > > Or better, don't let me know.
>
> > > > > > > (sigh)
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 22, 10:54 am, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I have no problem with the richest Americans paying the same 
> > > > > > > > tax rate
> > > > > > > > as struggling working class Americans.
>
> > > > > > > > Why do Republicans have such a problem with this?
>
> > > > > > > > If I am a struggling working class American and I see Congress
> > > > > > > > spending money to help the rich stay rich as a consequence
> > > > > > > > of the rich being fiscally irresponsible and running the economy
> > > > > > > > into a ditch, is it being unfair to ask the rich to them help
> > > > > > > > pay for the damage of their irresponsibility?
>
> > > > > > > > Apparently the Republicans feel this is unfair.
>
> > > > > > > > I don't. I Think people call it sharing the pain.- Hide quoted 
> > > > > > > > text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to