*In Ukraine The Covert War Has Begun---not an American concern.*
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:29:03 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/melikkaylan/2014/04/16/why-cia-director-brennan-visited-kiev-in-ukraine-the-covert-war-has-begun/
>
>  
>
> *4/16/2014 @ 4:30PM **|**2,002 views *
>
> *Why CIA Director Brennan Visited Kiev: In Ukraine The Covert War Has 
> Begun*
>
> Ukraine is on the brink of civil war, Vladimir 
> Putin<http://www.forbes.com/profile/vladimir-putin/>has said, and he should 
> know because the country is already in the midst of 
> a covert intelligence war. Over the weekend, CIA director John Brennan 
> travelled to Kiev, nobody knows exactly why, but some speculate that he 
> intends to open US intelligence resources to Ukrainian leaders about 
> real-time Russian military maneuvers. The US has, thus far, refrained from 
> sharing such knowledge because Moscow is believed to have penetrated much 
> of Ukraine’s communications systems – and 
> Washington<http://www.forbes.com/washington/>isn’t about to hand over its 
> surveillance secrets to the Russians.
>
> If you have any doubts that the battle is raging on the ‘covert ops’ front 
> just consider today’s events in Pcholkino where Ukrainian soldiers from the 
> 25th Airborn Division handed over their weapons and APC’s to pro-Russian 
> militiamen and pretty much surrendered. The Ukrainian commander was quoted 
> as saying “they’ve captured us and are using dirty tricks”. This is the 
> kind of morale-busting incident that can spread quickly. It doesn’t happen 
> spontaneously and it often begins with mixed messages, literally – messages 
> purporting to come from the chain of command but actually originate from 
> the enemy’s dirty tricks department. 
>
> So what kind of conversations did Brennan have during his visit? There’s 
> no way of knowing for sure of course. But, according to my sources, and 
> based on my experience of reporting on the Russian invasion of Georgia, the 
> US-Ukraine information exchange would go a lot further than simply tracking 
> numbers and motions of Russian tanks and soldiers. The operative term here 
> is ‘non-lethal’ help – that remains Washington’s official position. But in 
> today’s digital and virtual battlefield, the game can be over before the 
> first shot gets fired. And if Moscow’s mastery over the digital domain can 
> be countered, Putin might think twice about risking the expensive hardware 
> that he has invested billions in upgrading since the Georgian war. 
>
> In that conflict, the US refused to sell air-cover missiles (Manpads) to 
> Tbilisi while the Israelis deactivated the ones they’d sold after Putin 
> threatened them with retaliation by selling Hezbollah comparable weapons. 
> So Georgia was left with the Ukraine-made missiles it had purchased, which 
> proved effective but not numerous enough. The Russians have undoubtedly 
> rectified that vulnerability, especially as they and Ukraine share the same 
> weapons systems. In effect, Russian warplanes have likely found ways to jam 
> targeting vectors or to create illusory electronic clusters to decoy the 
> manpads. 
>
> So Brennan might have shared data on how to get past the jamming. The same 
> kind of forensic struggle applies to aerial combat, a rare thing these days 
> but one that may become decisive if ground-based missiles prove 
> ineffectual. Since the Russians can hack into any kind of long-distance 
> chatter about such details between the US and Kiev, Brennan probably had to 
> physically hand them over to his Ukrainian interlocutors. That is, to fully 
> vetted individuals, because as we’ve seen repeatedly during the current 
> crisis, not least in the Maidan, Russian spies masquerading as Ukrainian 
> patriots are not uncommon. Ukraine’s politicians and military personnel 
> (though not nearly as much) have a long history of divided loyalties. 
>
> Digital conflict, by its very nature, is a shadow conflict and therefore 
> fundamentally psychological. If you lose touch with central command or you 
> suspect the enemy is messing with your communications, you become isolated. 
> You fire at your own side, shoot down your warplanes. In fact, you’re 
> likely to stop shooting altogether, out of confusion and paralysis, as 
> happened in some military bases in Georgia. And now is happening in 
> Ukraine. You don’t know if the coded messages telling you to refrain from 
> firing are a feint or genuine. In a modern war between two sides with 
> hardware i.e. not a guerilla war, line-of-sight engagements occur less 
> often than you’d think. Tanks and planes and artillery get knocked out from 
> afar. Digital certainty is everything. The absence of it spells disaster.   
>
> So Brennan needed to reassure his hosts above all on that matter. Or 
> perhaps vice-versa. They might need to reassure the US that Ukraine’s 
> military position is not hopeless. If the US assessed the Ukrainian armed 
> forces as too electronically compromised to use heavy weapons systems, then 
> Washington might discourage a confrontation, might refuse to help in 
> crucial ways, as happened in Georgia. Or Washington might suggest alternate 
> methodologies, low-tech or asymmetrical alternatives, to create enough 
> confusion or humiliation as to tarnish Putin’s popularity. The Russian side 
> has clearly initiated such tactics already. Brennan will try to shore up 
> the security of Ukraine’s military signals systems. He will suggest ways to 
> retaliate in kind by hacking into the pro-Moscow militia’s comms. 
>
> To get an idea of how crucial is this stage of the confrontation, just 
> witness how images of Ukrainian armored vehicles now driven by militias 
> have gone global. Moscow will trumpet the news, claiming that even 
> Ukrainian soldiers don’t want to fight, that the US is stoking artificial 
> hatred. The government in Kiev will find itself snookered – either to admit 
> that its signals channels are hopelessly compromised and therefore cannot 
> mount a convincing military operation or that such incidents are 
> spontaneous but limited. A tough position either way. One thing is certain, 
> the war has begun. 
>
>  
>
>
> __._,_.___
>  
>
>  Visit Your 
> Group<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmM2JtcWNiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzOTc3NTI4MzE->
>  
>    
>    
>  [image: Yahoo! 
> Groups]<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYXFvcDBtBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM5Nzc1MjgzMQ-->
>  
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • 
> Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of 
> Use<https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>  
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to