http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/national-review-writers-shoot-holes-concealed-carry-claims-activists-media


National Review Writers Shoot Holes in Concealed Carry Claims of Activists,
Media

*April 30, 2014 - 11:05 AM *
------------------------------



*By Matt Vespa <http://cnsnews.com/source/matt-vespa>*

Concealed carry holders are killers.  All of them.  Well, at least, that's
how the Violence Policy Center labels them.  They recently put out a
ludicrous report that claimed 636 people have been
killed<http://www.vpc.org/ccwkillers.htm>by "concealed carry killers"
between March 2007 and March of 2014.  All
fifty states have some form of concealed carry law, 11 million people carry
concealed handguns, and it seems that pro-gun control shills still fudge
the data.

John Lott wrote for National Review
<http://www.nationalreview.com/article/376745/bogus-gun-control-numbers-john-r-lott-jr>that
the Violence Policy Center did just that; they cooked the books.
 Additionally, they use irrelevant data in order to push the gun control
narrative.  Lott used VPC's analysis on Michigan as an example:

For Michigan, for example, it cites state-police reports on permit holders
indicating that 185 died from suicide during the period 2007 through 2012.
Surely some alarm bells should have gone off, with Michigan suicides
supposedly making up 29 percent of all 636 deaths nationwide the VPC
attributed to permitted concealed handguns.

But more importantly, the suicides are not in any meaningful way linked to
the issue of carrying a permitted concealed handgun outside of one's home.
If you look at page 2 in the latest report from the Michigan State Police,
you will see that in the listing of suicides, there is no indication of
specific cause of death. The report merely notes that 56 permit holders
committed suicide, without saying whether any or all of them used a gun.
Interestingly, the suicide rate among permit holders in Michigan in 2010
(13.3 per 100,000 permit holders) is lower than the rate in the general
adult population (16.30). But typically suicides - with or without guns -
take place at home. So, again, what would these numbers have to do with the
concealed-carry debate? ...

Secondly, since it can take years for a murder case to go to trial, some of
the homicides may have occurred well before 2007. In addition, the Michigan
State Police report doesn't provide information on how the murder was
committed, so gun murders make up only a portion of this total.​

Third, and perhaps the worst mistake, the Violence Policy Center actually
adds the "pending" and "conviction" numbers together. Convictions are
obviously what should be counted. After all, some of the "pending" cases do
not result in a conviction, and adding them more than doubles the total
number. ...

Yet, put aside all these problems for a moment. Assume, for the sake of
argument, that the Violence Policy Center's claim that concealed-handgun
permits were responsible for 636 deaths in seven years is correct. One has
to note that there are over 11 million concealed-handgun permits in the
U.S. right now. With an annual number of deaths of 90, that means 0.00083
percent of concealed-carry permit holders were responsible for a shooting
death each year. Removing suicides from the total reduces the rate even
more, to 0.00058 percent.

Although, this ignorance on firearms is also on display with the press.
 The Washington Post's E.J. Dionne, a staunch liberal, wrote a stunning
op-ed that gave the grim prognostication that Georgia's new gun law will
usher in a new neo-Hobbesian era in America.  Well, that's not true either.
  Like the VPC, Dionne is either ignorant of the law or disregards the
facts to fit his own narrative as NRO's Charles Cooke exposed in his dissection
of the Washington Post
columnist<http://www.nationalreview.com/article/376756/georgia-not-jungle-charles-c-w-cooke>
.

So, let's get to Dionne's
reasons<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-the-gun-supremacists-folly/2014/04/27/6b4a1d90-cd99-11e3-a75e-463587891b57_story.html>to
fear thy Georgian. First, he calls supporters of civil rights "gun
supremacists," so you know you're in for a treat:

"You will also be able to tote weapons into bars and their parking
facilities if the bar grants you permission. I can't wait to see the next
beer ad depicting a gunfight over who pays for the next round."

Cooke retorts:

In every state except Louisiana and Montana, it is already legal for
concealed-carry permit holders to take their firearms into restaurants that
serve alcohol (Montana allows only open carry in restaurants serving
alcohol). Only 16 states - Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma (to an extent), Texas, and Wyoming -
explicitly prohibit people who are carrying from entering bars (the state
of Indiana requires visitors to abide by the rules of their home state).
Where are the stories of Doc Holliday and Wyatt Earp?

But here's the most ludicrous claim Dionne makes:

And law and order goes out the window. As Niraj Chokshi noted in The Post,
this statute gets rid of state requirements that firearms dealers maintain
records of sales and purchases. Databases on license holders that span
multiple jurisdictions are banned. Those who commit gun crimes must be
chuckling, "Can you find me now?"

Cooke with the right hook:

Suffice it to say that the idea that "those who commit gun crimes" are
filling in sales forms, undergoing federal and state background checks, and
applying for concealed-carry licenses is risible. Nevertheless, like almost
every other outlet that has addressed this issue, Dionne deliberately
failed to inform his audience that the federal government will continue to
record all sales and purchases - *as it has done since 1968*. Here, Georgia
is merely removing the second layer of records, thus bringing itself into
line with 31 other states.

Furthermore, millions of fugitives can potentially buy firearms without
raising any red flags on background checks.  This isn't due to new
pro-Second Amendment laws.  It's because law enforcement doesn't bother to
file the 
paperwork<http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/matt-vespa/millions-fugitives-escape-national-background-registry-gun-purchases>.
Why? Apparently, they don't want to pursue criminals across state lines.
 So, I guess Dionne has a point when he says that law and order goes out
the window.  It's the police who are making it so in this case.




__._,_.___


 Visit Your 
Group<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZzhpMHBsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzOTg4NzgxMzM->


 [image: Yahoo!
Groups]<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMWQydW9pBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM5ODg3ODEzMw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>•
Terms
of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to