Posted: 4:08 am
October 22, 2008

http://www.nypost.com/seven/10222008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/bidens_bungles__a_blatant_bias_134700.htm#comments

Barack Obama's choice of Joe Biden as his running mate prompted a small wave
of warnings about Biden's propensity for gaffes. But no one imagined even in
a worse-case scenario such a spectacular bomb as telling donors Sunday to
"gird your loins" because a young president Obama will be tested by an
international crisis just like young President John Kennedy was.

Scary? You betcha! But somehow, not front-page news.

Again the media showed their incredible bias by giving scattered coverage of
Biden's statements.

There were a few exceptions. On MSNBC's "Morning Joe," co-host Mika
Brzezinski flipped incredulously through the papers, expressing shock at the
lack of coverage of Biden's remarks. Guest Dan Rather admitted that if Palin
had said it, the media would be going nuts.

So what gives?

The stock answer is: "It's just Biden being Biden." We all know how smart he
is about foreign policy, so it's not the same as when Sarah Palin says
something that seems off.

Yet, when Biden asserted incorrectly in the vice-presidential debate that
the United States "drove Hezbollah out of Lebanon," nobody in the US media
shrieked. (It was, however, covered with derision in the Middle East.) Or
when he confused his history by claiming FDR calmed the nation during the
Depression by going on TV, the press didn't take it as evidence that he's
clueless.

And Biden is the foreign-policy gravitas on the Democratic ticket, so his
comments are actually even more disconcerting.
The outakes of his Sunday remarks don't begin to capture the magnitude of
what he said. After warning the crowd that there would be some sort of
international incident - Biden could think of four or five scenarios - he
told the donors: "We're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence
within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent
initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."

What does that mean? Obama's election would provoke an international
incident because of his inexperience and even Obama's biggest supporters
won't be reassured by his response?

Then there were Biden's predictions on the economy: "I promise you, you all
are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they
there in the polls? . . . Why is this thing so tough? . . . I'm asking you
now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point,
because you're going to have to reinforce us.

"There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, 'Whoa, wait a minute, yo,
whoa, whoa, I don't know about that decision.' "
Biden is teling us that, at a time when Americans need to feel confidence in
their government, they will be going "Oh my God." Not a great message.

Needless to say, if Sarah Palin said this about a McCain administration, the
media world would be exploding.
Whether you believe Biden is exaggerating, as he is known to do, or is
providing real insight, the double standard in the media does even more
damage to their lagging brand.

Part of the problem is their "Obama love," but we're also seeing the media
elite's belief - prejudice - that anyone with an R behind their name is
dumb. So, if they say something dumb, they must be dumb. A Democrat, like
Biden, can make wildly inaccurate or outrageous comments and they are
ignored because the TV and press insiders feel they "know who he really is."


On the stump recently, Sen. Biden declared he had "three words" for what the
nation needs: "J-O-B-S."

Lucky for him, his name isn't Dan Quayle, or that would have followed him
for the rest of his career.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to