The weren't so frumpy. I think I read Washington was vain. Part of his anger at the British was that his trousers had to be tailored in England. George had a famously large rump.
On Oct 25, 7:29�am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't a fashion show, it's a Presidential election. How sad that > it has devolved into nothing more than Dancing with the Stars. Our > forefathers, in all their frumpiness, must be rolling over in their > graves. > > On Oct 25, 12:53 am, rigsy03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Remember the criticism of Nancy Reagan's china and designer dresses? > > And she was just a First Lady. I think women should ponder the > > treatment of Palin and company. Maybe a dumpy Hillary in pantsuits > > will get them further. > > > On Oct 24, 8:29 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > RE: "Palin spends $32,800 on hair & makeup in TWO WEEKS" > > > > Good.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
