*Hypocrisy of Obama, Kerry Over Warnings on Gaza Starts To Grate on Israel*

*By MICHAEL FREUND, Special to the Sun | July 22, 2014*

*http://www.nysun.com/editorials/hypocrisy-of-obama-kerry-brover-warnings-on-gaza/88790/
<http://www.nysun.com/editorials/hypocrisy-of-obama-kerry-brover-warnings-on-gaza/88790/>*

With a predictability that is rapidly becoming mind-numbing monotony,
various American officials — from the president on down — have been
stressing the need for Israel to exercise restraint in its counter- terror
operation in Gaza so as to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties.

In addition to President Obama, this concern has been voiced in recent days
in one form or another by none other than Secretary of State Kerry and the
American envoy in Israel, Ambassador Shapiro, as well as the spokesmen for
the State Department and the White House.

Just in case we didn't get the message the fourth or fifth time it was
delivered in public, both the president and the secretary of state are said
to have repeated it in private telephone conversations with Prime Minister
Netanyahu.

As Ronald Reagan might have put it, "there they go again." And again, and
again, and again.

Washington's recurring mantra about restraint is not merely tiresome, it is
profoundly hypocritical, and it highlights just to what degree Mr. Obama's
foreign policy resembles the parent who, while holding a cigarette, tells
his child: "Do as I say, not as I do."

Take, for example, America's policy of carrying out drone strikes against
al-Qaida affiliates in places such as Yemen, where terrorists have
succeeded in seizing territory and transforming it into a platform for
violence (sound familiar?).

In a 102-page report released on October 22, 2013, by Human Rights Watch,
entitled "Between a Drone and al-Qaida: The Civilian Cost of US Targeted
Killings in Yemen," the group examined six strikes carried out by American
forces in that embattled country. They found that at least 57 of the 82
people killed in the attacks were in fact innocent civilians.

In other words, for all of its sermonizing to Israel about restraint,
America had few qualms about killing twice as many civilians as terrorists
in its drone strikes in Yemen.

Among the incidents cited in the report was one in September 2012 in Sarar,
in central Yemen, when a passenger van carrying 12 civilians was blown to
bits by mistake. In another incident, in December 2009, America carried out
on a Bedouin camp in the Yemeni village of al-Majalah a cruise missile
strikethat  killed 14 al-Qaida terrorists and 41 civilians, two-thirds of
whom were said to be women and children.

Whatever happened to Mr. Obama's "serious concern about the growing number
of casualties," which a White House statement on Sunday said the president
had raised with Mr. Netanyahu during a phone conversation? Apparently, as
far as Washington is concerned, the ends justify the means in the war on
terror, unless the one pulling the trigger to defend himself happens to be
Israeli.

On the same day that the Human Rights Watch report regarding Yemen was made
public, Amnesty International released a study of U.S. drone strikes in
Pakistan. Entitled "Will I Be Next?", the document assessed nine drone
attacks that took place between January 2012 and August 2013 in Pakistan's
North Waziristan province. Here too, there were "incidents in which men,
women and children appear to have been unlawfully killed or injured," the
report noted.

These include the inexplicable U.S. drone attack in October 2012 in which a
68-year-old grandmother, Mamana Bibi, was blasted to smithereens in front
of her grandchildren while gathering vegetables in an open field.

Earlier that year, on July 6, American drones attacked and killed 18
Pakistani laborers who had gathered for dinner after a day's work, and then
carried out a second strike on the first responders who came to help the
wounded.

In most such cases, the United States does not even acknowledge its
responsibility for such attacks, let alone issue an apology.

And it certainly does not heed calls for restraint.

Now don’t get me wrong. I fully support Washington's policy of using drones
to take out terrorists, a policy that has weakened al-Qaida and its
affiliates in a variety of countries. But I find it hard to fathom
America's selective moral calculus when it browbeats Israel to be extra
careful vis-à-vis civilians in a war zone even as the U.S. itself fails to
show such caution.

Sure, the Obama administration has voiced its support for Israel's right to
defend itself. But by couching this phrase alongside an overly insistent
need for restraint, Washington is sending the following message: You Jews
can of course defend yourselves, but only up to a point.

The bottom line is that in the first 13 days after the start of Operation
Protective Edge, the Palestinians fired 1,780 rockets from Gaza at Israeli
towns, villages and cities. That averages out to about 137 rockets a day,
or more than five an hour, every hour, for nearly two weeks.

This is unconscionable, unacceptable, and must be stopped.

In this war, we should bear in mind the immortal words of the late General
George S. Patton, Jr., who commanded the Third United States Army after the
invasion of Normandy in 1944. Once, before heading into battle, he
reportedly declared, "May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I sure as
hell won't."

Sounds callous? Perhaps.

But in a war of survival against a determined foe, it is the only way to
prevail.

*From the Jerusalem Post.*




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNGZuYXYyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MDYwMzk1NDg->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbWY2NGdxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQwNjAzOTU0OA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to