Report cites “utter incompetence” : As Recalls Mount, Was It Worth Bailing Out the ‘Old GM’?
By Nick Sorrentino on July 28, 2014
No it was not. There are a few union members who made out like bandits and a few more senior managers who got to keep their very generous pensions. It was worth it for the president because he was able to sway Michigan and Ohio by convincing people the auto bailout was for them. But for the rest of us, the world would be better off if GM had died in 2009.
One thing no one talks about is that GM, long before the recession, was sometimes called “a healthcare and pension company which just happened to also make cars.” It was a basket case going way back. The financial press for years fretted about how GM was going to solve its pension problem. Then the recession happened and the there was a collosal excuse to absolve GM of its obligations, courtesy of the taxpayer. It was a ruse. A scam. Management knew it. Senior union leaders knew it. The Obama administration knew it. Wall Street knew it. And the taxpayer was taken for a ride.
Don’t tell me about how many jobs the bailout saved. That’s a cop out which helps people feel better about supporting a jack of the American people. Those jobs likely would have just moved south to non-union states. (Which was the real fear.) Cadillac would have lived. Corvette and GM trucks would probably survived too. The rest of the GM lineup was (and sadly to a large degree still is) trash and should have been tossed onto the same scrap heap that Saturn, Hummer, Saab, Oldsmobile, and Pontiac were tossed onto.
GM was and is dysfunctional. It was and in many ways still is a disaster (as the below article points out.) But it was and is so big that it was able to leverage political connections to take from the American taxpayer. Just like the big banks. Shoot it basically was one of the big banks.
It is not a question of whether GM should have been bailed out. It should never have been. The auto bailout, along with TARP and the ongoing bailouts are pure crony capitalism. They were to be frank, theft. There is no “populist” reason for the bailout. The bailout was not for the good of the economy. The economy as a whole would be better off without GM, which in many ways now represents economic “dead wood” just waiting to catch fire in the next economic blaze. No, the question is whether both GM management and GM union leadership should have been tried together or separately for crimes against the American taxpayer.
- (From Real Clear Markets)
Click here for the article.
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/07/utter-incompetence-as-recalls-mount-was-it-worth-bailing-out-the-old-gm/ --
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
