http://online.wsj.com/articles/new-level-of-smartphone-encryption-alarms-law-enforcement-1411420341


New Level of Smartphone Encryption Alarms Law EnforcementMoves by Apple and
Google Are Latest Fallout From Snowden's Disclosures

Moves by Apple <http://quotes.wsj.com/AAPL> Inc. and Google
<http://quotes.wsj.com/GOOGL> to put some smartphone data out of the reach
of police and the courts are raising alarms inside U.S. law-enforcement
agencies, current and former officials say.

Several officials in Washington said they were bracing for a confrontation
with Silicon Valley on the issue, the latest fallout from the revelations
by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden
<http://topics.wsj.com/person/S/Edward-Snowden/7461> about government
surveillance.

Last week, Apple announced that its new operating system for phones would
prevent law enforcement from retrieving data stored on a locked phone, such
as photos, videos and contacts. A day later, Google reiterated that the
next version of its Android mobile-operating system this fall would make it
similarly difficult for police or Google to extract such data from
suspects' phones.

It's not just a feature—it's also a marketing pitch. "It's not technically
feasible for us to respond to government warrants for the extraction of
this data," Apple's website says.

Apple acknowledged it could still hand such data over to law enforcement
that users back up on the company's iCloud servers. And police can access
some iPhone data without Apple's help, because phone firms keep call logs
and Apple doesn't control data from third-party apps.

In its announcement, Apple also sought to distinguish itself as more
protective of customers' privacy than its competitors are, saying it
doesn't use customers' data to sell or target ads. Google didn't comment on
the customer privacy issue.

The moves highlight the continuing challenge for law enforcement in
responding to new technologies. Other innovations, such as texting, instant
messaging and videogame chats, created hurdles to monitoring communication,
though law-enforcement agencies in almost every instance eventually found
ways to overcome them.

But this time, two of the best-known U.S. companies are advertising that
their phone systems may be able to beat a court order, and putting the
technology in the hands of tens of millions of people.

"All of a sudden, a for-profit company has decided, 'We're going to step in
and be the first line of defense for customers against their own
government,' " said Brian Pascal, a fellow at Stanford University who has
worked on privacy issues at Palantir Technologies Inc. and International
Business Machines <http://quotes.wsj.com/IBM> Corp. IBM -0.45%
<http://quotes.wsj.com/IBM> International Business Machines Corp.
<http://quotes.wsj.com/IBM> U.S.: NYSE $192.24 -0.87 -0.45% Sept. 23, 2014
10:49 am Volume (Delayed 15m) : 834,800 P/E Ratio 12.10 Market Cap $197.87
Billion Dividend Yield 2.29% Rev. per Employee $229,711 09/22/14 New Level
of Smartphone Encryp...
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/new-level-of-smartphone-encryption-alarms-law-enforcement-1411420341>
09/21/14
Chinese Overseas Buying Increa...
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/chinese-overseas-buying-increasingly-shifts-to-private-from-state-1411335001>
09/17/14
No Parting of the Cloud for Ra...
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/no-parting-of-the-cloud-for-rackspace-heard-on-the-street-1410978449>
More
quote details and news »
<http://quotes.wsj.com/IBM?mod=articleInlineTicker> *IBM
<http://quotes.wsj.com/IBM> in *Your Value Your Change Short position

Apple and Google declined to comment. An Apple spokeswoman pointed to the
company's new privacy policy and comments Chief Executive Tim Cook
<http://topics.wsj.com/person/C/Tim-Cook/5997> made in a recent interview
with Charlie Rose. "People have a right to privacy," Mr. Cook said. "And I
think that's going to be a very key topic over the next year or so."

Apple previously ruffled Justice Department feathers by encrypting its
iMessage texting and FaceTime calling services, making them more difficult
for police to intercept. Apple says even it cannot decipher the
communications.

Now, Apple said its new iOS 8 mobile-operating system will by default
encrypt certain data on the phone if users set a passcode. That will make
the data undecipherable, to both phone thieves and police. The new
operating system works with any iPhone released since late 2011, starting
with the 4s model. About one-quarter of Americans owned an iPhone as of May.

In the past, investigators with court orders have been able to send
harvested iPhones to Apple's Cupertino, Calif., headquarters, where
engineers could extract certain data.

Last week's announcements surprised senior federal law-enforcement
officials, some of whom described it as the most alarming consequence to
date of the frayed relationship between the federal government and the tech
industry since the Snowden revelations prompted companies to address
customers' concerns that the firms were letting—or helping—the government
snoop on their private information.

Senior U.S. law-enforcement officials are still weighing how forcefully to
respond, according to several people involved in the discussions, and
debating how directly they want to challenge Apple and Google.

One Justice Department official said that if the new systems work as
advertised, they will make it harder, if not impossible, to solve some
cases. Another said the companies have promised customers "the equivalent
of a house that can't be searched, or a car trunk that could never be
opened.''

Andrew Weissmann, a former Federal Bureau of Investigation general counsel,
called Apple's announcement outrageous, because even a judge's decision
that there is probable cause to suspect a crime has been committed won't
get Apple to help retrieve potential evidence. Apple is "announcing to
criminals, 'use this,' " he said. "You could have people who are defrauded,
threatened, or even at the extreme, terrorists using it.''

The level of privacy described by Apple and Google is "wonderful until it's
your kid who is kidnapped and being abused, and because of the technology,
we can't get to them,'' said Ronald Hosko, who left the FBI earlier this
year as the head of its criminal-investigations division. "Who's going to
get lost because of this, and we're not going to crack the case?"

Even as officials debated how to respond to the change, a high-profile
missing person case pointed to the potential implications of the new
technology. Last week, authorities issued search warrants for the
apartment, car and phone of a person of interest in the disappearance of
University of Virginia student Hannah Graham, a case that remains unsolved.
Under the new operating system announced by Apple, a similar phone search
in the future might be fruitless.

One official of a technology-industry association said the companies are
responding to pressure from customers and competition from foreign
companies to offer stronger privacy protections. The official suggested
tech companies would make additional moves if the federal government
doesn't take steps to protect privacy.

The new security offered by Apple and Google isn't absolute. In some cases,
police may be able to find ways around Apple's system, by cracking a phone
without Apple's help. Experts say no system is uncrackable.

In addition, a court could try to force a suspect to unlock his phone, said
Orin Kerr, a law professor at George Washington University. And a suspect
could make data vulnerable to investigators by backing up files, or linking
the phone to a computer.

Christopher Soghoian, principal technologist with the American Civil
Liberties Union, predicted federal investigators wouldn't be too hampered
by the change, but state and local detectives could be. "It's not so much a
problem for 'Big Brother,' but a problem for 'Little Brother,' " he said.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcjB0cmkzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTE0ODQyNzM->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMHRmbjFsBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMTQ4NDI3Mw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to