http://stupidfrogs.org/articles/why_does_obama_say_mideast_terrorists_arent_islamic.html



*Why Does Obama Say Mideast Terrorists Aren't Islamic?*



By Dennis Prager
IBDEditorials.com

President Obama declared in his recent address to the nation: "ISIL is not
Islamic."

But how does he know? On what basis did the president of the United States
declare that a group of Muslims that calls itself "Islamic State" not
Islamic?

Has he studied Islam and Islamic history, and concluded that ISIL, Boko
Haram, al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, Jamaat-e-Islami,
Lashkar-e-Taiba (the group that slaughtered 166 people in Mumbai, most
especially guests at the Taj Hotel, and tortured to death a rabbi and his
wife), the various Palestinian terrorist groups (all of which have been
Muslim, even though there are many Christian Palestinians), and the Muslim
terror groups in Somalia, Yemen, Libya and elsewhere are also all "not
Islamic"?

Has he concluded that the Muslim Brotherhood, which won Egypt's most open
election ever, is "not Islamic"?

And what about Saudi Arabia? Is that country "not Islamic," too?

Oh, and what about Iran? Also "not Islamic"?

Isn't that a lot of Muslims, Muslim groups, and even nations — all of whom
claim Islam as their religion — to dismiss as "not Islamic"?

To be fair, these baseless generalizations about what is and what is not
Islamic started with Obama's predecessor, President George W. Bush, who
regularly announced that "Islam is a religion of peace."

And it is equally unlikely that his assertion came from a study of Islam
and Islamic history.

*Conquering And Converting*

The fact is that a study of Islamic history could not lead any fair-minded
individual to conclude that all these Muslims and Islamic groups are "not
Islamic." Neither Islamic history, which, from its origins, offered vast
numbers of people a choice between Islam and death, nor Islam as reflected
in its greatest works, would lead one to draw that conclusion.

Killing "unbelievers" has been part — though of course not all — of Islam
since its inception. Within 10 years of Muhammad's death, Muslims had
conquered and violently converted whole peoples from Iran to Egypt and from
Yemen to Syria.

Muslims have offered conquered people death or conversion since that time.

The Hindu Kush, the vast, 500-mile long, 150-mile wide mountain range
stretching from Afghanistan to Pakistan, was populated by Hindus until the
Muslim invasions beginning around the year 1000.

The Persian name Hindu Kush was proudly given by Muslims. It means
"Hindu-killer." At least 60 million Hindus were killed by Muslims during
the thousand years of Muslim rule.

Though virtually unknown, it may be the greatest mass murder in history
next to Mao's.

The groups named above are following some dictates of the Quran.

A few of many such examples:

"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore
strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" (8:12).

"When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find
them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If
they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go
their way. God is forgiving and merciful" (9:5).

"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that
forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor
acknowledge the religion of Truth" (9:29).

There is also a different admonition in the Quran:

"In matters of faith, there shall be no compulsion" (2:256).

So a Muslim can also cite the Quran if he wishes to allow non-Muslims to
live in peace.

*The Superior Religion*

The problem is that Muslim theological tradition, affirmed by many
scholars, holds that later revelation to Muhammad supersedes prior
revelation (a doctrine known as "abrogation").

And the Quranic verses ordering Muslims to fight and slay nonbelievers came
after those admonishing Muslims to live with nonbelievers in peace and
without religious compulsion.

The problem is that Muslim history, in keeping with the doctrine of
abrogation, has far more often practiced the violent admonitions.

The problem is that more than 600 years after Muhammad, Ibn Khaldun, the
greatest Muslim writer who ever lived, explained why Islam is the superior
religion in the most highly regarded Muslim work ever written (except for
the Quran), "Muqaddimah," or "Introduction to History":

"In the Muslim community, the holy war is religious duty, because of the
universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert
everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force."

In other words, Ibn Khaldun boasts, whereas no other religion commands
converting the world through force, Islam does.

Was Ibn Khaldun also "not Islamic"? And so much for the president's other
claim that "no religion condones the killing of innocents."

None of this justifies bigotry against Muslims. There are hundreds of
millions of non-Islamist Muslims (an Islamist is a Muslim who seeks to
impose Shariah on others), including many "cultural" or secular Muslims.

And individual Muslims are risking their lives every day to provide the
intelligence needed to forestall terror attacks in America and elsewhere.

It is only a call to clarity amidst the falsehoods coming from the
president, the secretary of state and especially the universities.

As the courageous Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born woman who leads a
worldwide effort on behalf of Muslim women and for reforming Islam, asked
in a speech at Yale University this month: If Islam is a religion of peace,
why is a sword on the Saudi flag?

If the president feels he has to obfuscate for the sake of gaining Muslim
allies, so be it. But the rest of us don't have to make believe that what
he said is true.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmY3VvYWQwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTE1NzgyOTU->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNnAxaGdjBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMTU3ODI5NQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to