Daniel Greenfield's article: Liberal Islamophiles
<http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/>

[image: Link to Sultan Knish] <http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/>
------------------------------

Posted: 12 Oct 2014 09:30 AM PDT

"We’re liberals! We’re liberals. We’re not crazy tea-baggers," Bill Maher
protested after his televised argument with Ben Affleck about Islam.

*[image:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jYSM1ems1bo/VDqrwPpFm5I/AAAAAAAAOcw/nbhFhXpYhmM/s1600/hillary-hands_up.jpg]*
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jYSM1ems1bo/VDqrwPpFm5I/AAAAAAAAOcw/nbhFhXpYhmM/s1600/hillary-hands_up.jpg>
"We
are not bigoted people. On the contrary, we’re trying to stand up for the
principles of
liberalism!" Maher added. "I think we’re just saying we need to identify
illiberalism wherever we find it in the world, and not forgive it because
it comes from [a group] people perceive as a minority."

But despite Maher’s protests, the majority of liberals would agree with
Affleck that criticizing Islam is racist. Liberals claim that the Islamic
State is Un-Islamic. It would be more accurate to state that liberals are
illiberal. Liberalism, even the form that was in common usage not too long
ago, is as dead as Lenin.

Ben Affleck isn’t a liberal. He’s an enthusiast of revisionist Communist
historian Howard Zinn. The modern liberal of today is uninterested in
identifying “illiberalism” since he is an illiberal man of the left. The
most significant difference between the two is not simply political, but
psychological. Liberals used to think about issues. Leftists respond to
ideological cues while operating on a purely tribal wavelength.

Affleck’s assertion that criticizing Islam is racist is impossible to argue
with. It’s completely wrong on multiple levels, but it’s not an argument.
It’s a denunciation. It doesn’t advance an argument; it rejects the
argument and the arguer as illegitimate. And it’s an ideological cue
telling everyone else to follow.

Leftists don’t debate issues. That would be a liberal thing to do. Instead
they seek to affirm a consensus. The consensus is reinforced by in-group
flattery which convinces members that they are empathetic and enlightened
people, while those outside the consensus are subjected to constant
contempt and abuse. The denunciation places the target outside the
consensus. Calling Maher a “racist” makes him a Tea Party member no matter
how much he clings to a liberal identification. It makes him an outsider.

The USSR was every bit as “illiberal” as ISIS, but critics of it were
damned as “red-baiters” and McCarthyists. Now critics of Islam are
denounced as racists even though Islam is not a race.

Why are Stalin and Mohammed part of the consensus, but their liberal
critics weren’t? The answer tells us a good deal about what the consensus
really is and what it isn’t.

The things that Maher and Harris criticize Islam for, a lack of freedom,
sexism and homophobia are not part of the consensus. Not when the flagship
party of liberalism was also the party of segregation, the leading members
of the golden family of liberalism were serial abusers of women and Bill,
Hillary and Obama were against gay marriage before they were for it. Islam
is sexist, bigoted and totalitarian, but so was the Soviet Union. Their
liberal defenders are utterly unconcerned, no matter how much they run
their mouths about Republican racism and sexism.

Nearly every Muslim country locks up gay men, but so did nearly every
Communist country.

*[image:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Ljocgl-YeN8/VDqsc4fTiiI/AAAAAAAAOdA/tMYy9lbW-ZQ/s1600/obama_bow_1381505c.jpg]*
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Ljocgl-YeN8/VDqsc4fTiiI/AAAAAAAAOdA/tMYy9lbW-ZQ/s1600/obama_bow_1381505c.jpg>Do
you think that Ben Affleck is bothered by the fact that Doha and Dubai,
whose film industries he has become entangled with, are built and run by
slave labor? Or that homosexuality is criminalized? The same Hollywood
leftists who put on their indignant faces over Proposition 8 shut up when
they’re partying in one of the pleasure cities of the Gulf Muslims who do a
lot more than refuse to recognize gay marriage. They’re not just
hypocrites; they were never committed to gay rights.

Gays, feminists and Muslims are a means to the left. They are not the
reason why the left does things.

The left builds coalitions of disruption with interest groups. It doesn’t
care about those groups. It’s just using them to get what it really wants
which is a totalitarian state in which the consensus can implement all of
its horrible ideas without any interference. Muslims are the newest
coalition member and their disruption skills are impressive. Just look at
how they managed to turn the Bush Administration around.

That doesn’t mean that the left cares about Muslims. It would toss them
under the bus before they could shout “Allah Akhbar” if it suited the
consensus. The liberal defenders of Islam have chosen not to read the
Koran. They know next to nothing about Islam except that it’s a minority
group. And that’s how they like it. That way they can shout down any
criticism with cries of “Racism” because they’re too lazy to even bother
stringing enough letters together to shout “Islamophobe”. That’s how little
they care.

All of this has as much to do with liberalism as Obama has to do with
Andrew Jackson. There’s nothing liberal about the honor killing and the
hijab, but there’s also nothing liberal about trying to turn America into a
totalitarian state. Maher, who has been known to identify as a libertarian,
doesn’t seem to have grasped that the liberals who defend Islam do so
because they share its totalitarian mindset.

Lenin wasn’t fighting so that the peasants would have land, bread and
peace. Today’s liberals aren’t fighting for equality of income, gender,
race or any other kind. They are fighting to suppress any and all
opposition to their policies by disrupting and destroying the existing
American system at every level.

That’s exactly what Islam is doing.

Leftists don’t value equality, they value disruption. If they can disrupt
by promoting equality, they will do it. If they can disrupt by promoting
inequality, they will do that. If they can disrupt by promoting gay
marriage, promoting Islamists, promoting the environment, promoting
unregulated industry, promoting freedom of speech or promoting hate speech
laws, they will do those things in order of opportunism.

Their underlying goal is to replace existing ideas and systems with their
own. Anything that serves that purpose is good. Anything that maintains the
existing order is bad.

*[image:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tXZLRrCtUJE/VDqscAvuilI/AAAAAAAAOc4/uezQFfJMKwI/s1600/Hillary%2Band%2BHuma%2BAbedin.jpg]*
<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tXZLRrCtUJE/VDqscAvuilI/AAAAAAAAOc4/uezQFfJMKwI/s1600/Hillary%2Band%2BHuma%2BAbedin.jpg>The
very concept of universal standards that Maher is appealing to is foreign
to the modern liberal. He doesn’t believe that there is a universal
standard. He views the world as tribally as a Taliban. He can’t see
behaviors as good or evil in isolation, but only in relation to ideological
cues. He derives his heroes and villains from the tribal affinities of the
left, not from the things that they actually do.

That’s why he wears a Che t-shirt while calling Rush Limbaugh unpatriotic
for opposing Obama. Or why he thinks that liberal billionaires underwriting
political campaigns is a good thing, but conservative billionaires doing it
is bad for democracy. He has no concept of standards. He only understands
power.

This isn’t liberalism. It’s a leftist Jihad that has displaced and hijacked
liberalism. The modern liberal has nothing to do with liberalism and it’s
useless to expect him to be upset by Islamic illiberalism.

Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger and a
Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

*[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA]*
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:yIl2AUoC8zA>*[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?d=I9og5sOYxJI]*
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:I9og5sOYxJI>*[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?d=63t7Ie-LG7Y]*
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:63t7Ie-LG7Y>*[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?i=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:F7zBnMyn0Lo]*
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:F7zBnMyn0Lo>*[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?d=UT3xtbGYFzA]*
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:UT3xtbGYFzA>*[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?d=qj6IDK7rITs]*
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=M2tzlknPTUU:eJ-SghFNGM8:qj6IDK7rITs>

[image:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews/~4/M2tzlknPTUU?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email]





Email delivery powered by Google






__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOGtuNnBwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTMyMzM3MTE->

   - New Members
   
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJna3BtNzFrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDEzMjMzNzEx>
   1

 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMzQ1cDhpBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxMzIzMzcxMQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to