Pay no attention to the assholes and the ignorance Travis.....Here is what
some of our members now defend, in the name of "Damnable Jews/Zionists":

http://shoebat.com/2014/11/01/just-came-leaked-video-isis-auctioning-sex-slaves-never-seen/

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/iraq-slave-markets-sell-women-10-attract-isis-recruits-1468506


Once again, what an asshole



On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> *Obama and *the Definition of ‘Islamic’
>
> Posted By *Caroline Glick* On November 4, 2014
>
> In his speech on September 11 announcing that the US would commence
> limited operations against Islamic State, US President Barack Obama
> insisted, “ISIL, [i.e. Islamic State] is not Islamic. No religion condones
> the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been
> Muslim.”
>
> To be sure, it is hard to see how any human faith can countenance IS’s
> actions. For the past several months, on a daily basis, new videos appear
> of IS fighters proudly, openly and wantonly committing crimes against
> humanity. This week for instance, a video emerged of an IS slave market in
> Raqqah, Syria, where women and girls are sold as sex slaves to IS fighters.
>
> Despite the glaring contradiction between divinity and monstrosity, the
> fact is that IS justifies every single one of its atrocities with verses
> from the Koran.
>
> IS referred to its sex slave market in Raqqah for instance as the “Booty
> Market… for what your right hands possess.”
>
> The phrase “what your right hands possess” is a Koranic verse (4:3) that
> permits the sexual enslavement of women and girls by Muslim men.
>
> Whether it is mainstream Islamic jurisprudence or not to embrace the
> enslavement of women and girls as concubines is not a question that Obama –
> or any US leader for that matter – is equipped to answer. And yet, Obama
> spoke with absolute certainty when he claimed that IS is not Islamic.
>
> Obama speaks with similar conviction whenever he refers to Iran as “The
> Islamic Republic of Iran.”
>
> Obama’s consistent deference to the Iranian regime, exposed by his
> studious use of the regime’s name for itself whenever he discusses Iran
> indicates that at a minimum, he is willing to accept the regime’s claim
> that it is an Islamic regime. In other words, he is willing to accept that
> everything about the Iranian regime is authentic Islam.
>
> And that the Islamic Republic then, in keeping with his assertion that “no
> religion condones the killing of innocents,” similarly does not condone the
> killing of innocents.
>
> Of course, there is a problem here. In fact, there are two problems here.
>
> First, in its treatment of its own people, the Iranian regime condones and
> actively engages in the killing of innocents, the vast majority of whom are
> Muslims. The Islamic regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran invokes the
> Koran to justify its killing.
>
> Likewise, the political imprisonment, torture and general repression of
> Iranians from all faiths are justified in the name of Islam.
>
> Consider two recent examples.
>
> On October 25, 27-year-old Reyhaneh Jabbari was hanged for allegedly
> killing a man who was trying to rape her. Jabbari was imprisoned for seven
> years prior to her execution.
>
> Although her suffering was a cause celebre for advocates of human rights
> in Iran, the regime didn’t care. In contempt of the international
> community, it murdered her a week ago.
>
> As her attorney Mohammed Mostataei explained at a conference held by UN
> Watch in Geneva last week, Jabbari was tried under Islamic law – the law of
> the land in the Islamic Republic of Iran. And under Islamic sharia law,
> intent in adjudication of criminal offenses is irrelevant. As a
> consequence, once regime inquisitors force a person to confess, he or she
> is doomed.
>
> Forced confessions are the stock in trade for Iranian investigators.
>
> Last month, 25 women in Isfahan, Iran’s tourist capital, were reportedly
> victims of acid attacks.
>
> The women had acid thrown in their faces while they were driving in their
> cars.
>
> The public immediately suspected that they were targeted because their
> faces were not covered sufficiently to satisfy Islamic goon squads that
> drive around the city seeking – with the tacit if not open support of the
> regime – to terrorize the public into obeying their repressive, inhumane
> interpretation of Islam.
>
> On October 22, human rights activists in Iran held demonstrations against
> the acid attacks outside the judiciary building in Isfahan and outside the
> Iranian parliament in Tehran. In both instances, protesters insisted that
> there is no difference between the repression inherent in the radical Islam
> propagated by IS and that practiced by the Iranian regime.
>
> In both cities, demonstrators were attacked by regime forces with tear
> gas. Many were arrested.
>
> After the acid attacks were first reported, the Iranian parliament passed
> measures to strengthen the authority of the regime’s Basij shock troop
> squads to enforce repressive, misogynist Islamic dress codes on women and
> enforce other socially repressive aspects of the regime’s Islam.
>
> As Baron Alexander Carile of Barriew, a member of the British House of
> Lords and expert on terrorism explained last Friday in The Washington
> Times, “In essence, the regime responded to the acid attacks that have
> seriously injured 25 people so far by legitimizing the motives of their
> attackers.”
>
> According to the UN, Iran executed 852 Iranians for various offenses from
> July 2013 through June 2014.
>
> This of course is just the tip of the iceberg. The vast majority of the
> regime’s killing is carried out by its proxies.
>
> IS’s persecution of those who have had the misfortune to fall under its
> control is a blight on the human race. And so is the persecution committed
> by Iran’s puppets – the Assad regime in Syria, and its Lebanese terror army
> Hezbollah.
>
> Since the Syrian civil war began three years ago, the Iranian-controlled
> regime has killed somewhere between 120,000 and 200,000 people.
>
> According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, nearly 10,000 of the
> dead are children, another 6,000 are women. Other groups place the number
> much higher.
>
> More than 2.14 million Syrians are now refugees in neighboring countries.
> Half of the refugees are children. Another 4.25 million Syrians are
> internally displaced.
>
> If it hadn’t been for Iran’s support for the regime, the vast majority of
> the victims of Syria’s civil war would still be alive and living in their
> homes.
>
> Thanks to Iran and its Hezbollah army, Lebanon is on the brink of sharing
> Syria’s fate.
>
> Hezbollah has played a major role in the war in Syria, and over the years,
> with Iran’s total backing, it has murdered thousands of people in Lebanon,
> Israel and throughout the world.
>
> Hezbollah has trained sister Iranian supported or commanded terrorist
> groups like Islamic Jihad and Hamas. With the blessing, and often acting on
> direct orders from the Islamic Republic, these groups have killed hundreds
> of innocents. Like Hezbollah, Assad and the mullahs in Tehran, they have
> also repressed their own people in the name of their Islamic devotion.
>
> And this brings us back to Obama and his insistence that IS is not
> Islamic, but the Iranian regime is Islamic. How are we to understand this
> seeming anomaly? Throughout his tenure in office, Obama has gone out of his
> way to mainstream Muslim extremists.
>
> This has taken the form of granting senior appointments to people aligned
> with the Muslim Brotherhood. For instance, amid a Congressional
> investigation into suspected leaks, Mohamed Elibiary, a senior fellow at
> the US Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council, resigned his
> position.
>
> Just before his resignation, Elibiary tweeted that the rise of the
> caliphate is “inevitable.” In 2004 he spoke at a conference in Dallas
> celebrating the legacy of Iranian dictator Ayatollah Khomeini. As Robert
> Spencer has reported, the conference was titled, “A Tribute to a Great
> Islamic Visionary.”
>
> Moreover, Obama had befriended radical Islamic leaders who openly support
> terrorism, including Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the emir of
> Qatar, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani.
>
> And of course, as we see more and more clearly each day, the centerpiece
> of Obama’s foreign policy has been appeasing the Islamic Republic of Iran
> in the hope of achieving détente with the nuclear weapons pursuing state
> sponsor of terrorism.
>
> The likes of IS, with its love of the video camera, discredit Obama’s
> narrative that radical, terror- supporting Muslims are peaceful. Since IS
> is openly evil, it is un-Islamic.
>
> On the other hand, despite the fact that it is nearly as barbaric as IS,
> the Iranian regime is Islamic, because as far as Obama is concerned, it is
> good. And it is good because he wants to make a deal with the mullahs.
>
> In other words, Obama is neither an expert on Islam, nor a man moved by
> moral indignation.
>
> He opposes IS because IS makes it hard for him to defend Islam from bad
> public relations. And he coos about the “Islamic Republic of Iran” because
> he is dedicated to his mission of whitewashing and mainstreaming the regime
> born of an Islamic revolution.
> ------------------------------
>
> Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: *http://www.frontpagemag.com
> <http://www.frontpagemag.com>*
>
> URL to article: 
> *http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/obama-and-the-definition-of-islamic/
> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/obama-and-the-definition-of-islamic/>*
>
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
>  ------------------------------
> Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>  Visit Your Group
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOXAwcG1tBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTUxNDcwNzU->
>
>    - New Members
>    
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnMzU2amxsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDE1MTQ3MDc1>
>    1
>
>  [image: Yahoo! Groups]
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlY3U2Y3VrBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNTE0NzA3NQ-->
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
> Unsubscribe
> <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms
> of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>  --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to