Lying in Islam

November 14, 2014 <http://nocompulsion.com/lying-in-islam/> mkamal
<http://nocompulsion.com/author/mkamal/> Reply
<http://nocompulsion.com/lying-in-islam/#respond>

[image: Lies (1)]
<http://nocompulsion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Lies-1.gif>



Like most religions, Islam in general, forbids lying. The Quran says,
“Truly Allah guides not one who transgresses and lies.” Surah 40:28. In the
Hadith, Mohammed was also quoted as saying, “Be honest because honesty
leads to goodness, and goodness leads to Paradise. Beware of falsehood
because it leads to immorality, and immorality leads to Hell.”

However, unlike most religions, within Islam there are certain provisions
under which lying is not simply tolerated, but actually encouraged. The
book “The spirit of Islam,” by the Muslim scholar, Afif A. Tabbarah was
written to promote Islam. On page 247, Tabbarah stated: “Lying is not
always bad, to be sure; there are times when telling a lie is more
profitable and better for the general welfare, and for the settlement of
conciliation among people, than telling the truth. To this effect, the
Prophet says: ‘He is not a false person who (through lies) settles
conciliation among people, supports good or says what is good.”

In exploring this puzzling duplicity within Islam, we will examine first
some examples from recent and ancient Islamic history. These examples
demonstrate that lying is a common policy amongst Islamic clerics and
statesmen.

In June of 1967 Egypt was defeated by Israel and lost the Sinai Peninsula
during the “Six Day War.” Subsequently, Egypt’s primary focus became to
regain the lost territory. President Nasser, and then, President Sadat,
adopted the motto: “No voice should rise over the voice of *The Battle*.”
The soldiers that had been drafted in 1967 were kept in service and
remained on high alert in the expectation that at any day “the battle”
would ensue. Nonetheless, years pasted and Egypt’s people became disgruntle
with the political hype and the “no peace, and no war” status. In 1972
Sadat proclaimed with finality that it was to be the year for the long
anticipated battle. Throughout the year he swore, “*I swear to you by my
honor that this year will not pass by, before we launch The Battle*.”
People believed him because he was staking his reputation and honor through
an oath. To everyone’s amazement the year passed without a single shot
being fired. As a result many, inside and outside Egypt, began to dismiss
him as a “hot air bluff”. This opinion was confirmed in the following year
of 1973. He made no further mention of his oath about the battle. Many of
the draftees were released and numerous officers were given vacation
furloughs. Then without warning, in October of 1973, he launched the attack
and what was known as the Yom Kippur war began.

As a military commander, Sadat was expected to use the element of surprise
to trick the enemy. As a devout Muslim, Sadat was not the least bit
concerned about his un-kept oath. He understood that the history and
teachings of Islam would exempt him from spiritual accountability if he
used lies as a foundation for a strategic military maneuver.

This point is proven by many incidences in the life of Mohammed. He often
lied and instructed his followers to do the same. He rationalized that the
prospect of success in missions to extend Islam’s influence overrode
Allah’s initial prohibitions against lying. A good example of sanctioned
lying is the account of the assassination of Kaab Ibn al-Ashrf, a member of
the Jewish tribe, Banu al-Nudair. It had been reported that Kaab had shown
support for the Quraishites in their battle against Mohammed. This was
compounded by another report that infuriated Mohammed. It was alleged that
Kaab had recited amorous poetry to Muslim women. Mohammed asked for
volunteers to rid him of Kaab Ibn al-Ashraf. As Mohammed put it, Kaab had
“Harmed Allah and His Apostle.” At that time Kaab Ibn al-Ashraf, and his
tribe were strong, so it was not easy for a stranger to infiltrate and
execute the task. A Muslim man by the name of Ibn Muslima, volunteered for
the murderous project on the condition that Mohammed would allow him to
lie. With Mohammed’s consent, Ibn Muslima, went to Kaab and told him
fabricated stories that reflected discontent about Mohammed’s leadership.
When he had gained Kaab’s trust he lured him away from his house one night
and murdered him in a remote area under the cover of darkness.

[image: liiiersss]
<http://nocompulsion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/liiiersss.jpg>A similar
example can be found in the story of killing Shaaban Ibn Khalid al-Hazly.
It was rumored that Shaaban was gathering an army to wage war on Mohammed.
Mohammed retaliated by ordering Abdullah Ibn Anis to kill Shaaban. Again,
the would-be killer asked the prophet’s permission to lie. Mohammed agreed
and then ordered the killer to lie by stating that he was a member of the
Khazaa clan. When Shaaban saw Abdullah coming, he asked him, “From what
tribe are you?” Abdullah answered, “From Khazaa.” He then added, “I have
heard that you are gathering an army to fight Mohammed and I came to join
you.” Abdullah started walking with Shaaban telling him how Mohammed came
to them with the heretical teachings of Islam, and complained how Mohammed
badmouthed the Arab patriarchs and ruined the Arab’s hopes. They continued
in conversation until they arrived at Shaaban’s tent. Shaaban’s companions
departed and Shaaban invited Abdullah to come inside and rest. Abdullah sat
there until the atmosphere was quiet and he sensed that everyone was
asleep. Abdullah severed Shaaban’s head and carried it to Mohammed as a
trophy. When Mohammed sighted Abdullah, he jubilantly shouted, “Your face
has been triumphant (Aflaha al- wajho).” Abdullah returned the greeting by
saying, “It is your face, Apostle of Allah, who has been triumphant.
(Aflaha wajhoka, ye rasoul Allah).”
Provisions for lying in Islam

Most Muslims are familiar with the principles of Islam that will justify
lying in situations where they sense the need to do so. Among these are:

·         War is deception.

·         The necessities justify the forbidden.

·         If faced by two evils, choose the lesser of the two.

These principles are derived from passages found in the Quran and the
Hadith.
*In the Quran, Allah, allegedly, says:*

*” Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but
He will call you to account for your deliberate oaths: for expiation, feed
ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your
families; or clothe them; or give a slave his freedom. If that is beyond
your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye
have sworn. But keep to your oaths. Thus doth Allah make clear to you His
signs, that ye may be grateful.” Surah 5:89*

*“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness (vain) in your
oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most
Forbearing.” Surah 2:225*

*“Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief, except
under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith – but such as open
their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a
dreadful Penalty.” Surah 16: 106*

The noted Islamic commentator, Al-Tabary explained Surah 16:106 as a verse
that had been revealed to Mohammed after he learned that Ammar Ibn Yasser
was forced to deny his faith in Mohammed when kidnapped by the Banu Moghera
tribe. Mohammed consoled Ammar by telling him, “If they turned, you turn.”
(Meaning: if they again capture you, you are allowed to deny me again.)

*These and similar passages from the Quran clearly reveal that Muslims’
unintentional lies are forgivable and that even their intentional lies can
be absolved by performing extra duties. It is also clear that if forced to
do so, Muslims can lie while under oath and can even falsely deny faith in
Allah, as long as they maintain the profession of faith in their hearts.*

*In the Hadith, Mohammed, emphasizes the same concept.*

>From “Ehiaa Oloum al-Din,” by the famous Islamic scholar al-Ghazali, Vol.
3: PP.284-287:

One of Mohammed’s daughters, Umm Kalthoum, testified that she had never
heard the Apostle of Allah condone lying, except in these three situations:

1.    For reconciliation among people.

2.    In war.

3.    Amongst spouses, to keep peace in the family.

One passage from the Hadith quotes Mohammed as saying: “The sons of Adam
are accountable for all lies except those uttered to help bring
reconciliation between Muslims.”

Another says, “Aba Kahl, reconcile among people.”(Meaning: even through
lying.)

The following quote demonstrates the broadness of situations in which the
prophet permitted lying. “The sons of Adam are accountable for all lies
with these exceptions: During war because war is deception, to reconcile
among two quarreling men, and for a man to appease his wife.”
The principle of Al-Takeyya

The Arabic word, “Takeyya”, means “to prevent,” or guard against. The
principle of Al Takeyya conveys the understanding that Muslims are
permitted to lie as a preventive measure against anticipated harm to one’s
self or fellow Muslims. This principle gives Muslims the liberty to lie
under circumstances that they perceive as life threatening. They can even
deny the faith, if they do not mean it in their hearts. Al-Takeyya is based
on the following Quranic verse:

*“Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than
believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except
by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them
(prevent them from harming you.) But Allah cautions you (To remember)
Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.” Surah 3: 28*

[image: Islam blog pic]
<http://nocompulsion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Islam-blog-pic.jpg>According
to this verse a Muslim can pretend to befriend infidels (in violation of
the teachings of Islam) and display adherence with their unbelief to
prevent them from harming him.

Under the concept of Takeyya and short of killing another human being, if
under the threat of force, it is legitimate for Muslims to act contrary to
their faith. The following actions are acceptable:

·         Drink wine, abandon prayers, and skip fasting during Ramadan.

·         Renounce belief in Allah.

·         Kneel in homage to a deity other than Allah.

·         Utter insincere oaths.
The implications of the principle of Al-Takeyya

Unfortunately, when dealing with Muslims, one must keep in mind that
Muslims can communicate something with apparent sincerity, when in reality
they may have just the opposite agenda in their hearts. Bluntly stated,
Islam permits Muslims to lie anytime that they perceive that their own
well-being, or that of Islam, is threatened.

In the sphere of international politics, the question is: Can Muslim
countries be trusted to keep their end of the agreements that they sign
with non-Muslim nations? It is a known Islamic practice, that when Muslims
are weak they can agree with most anything. Once they become strong, then
they negate what they formerly vowed.

The principle of sanctioning lying for the cause of Islam bears grave
implications in matters relating to the spread of the religion of Islam in
the West. Muslim activists employ deceptive tactics in their attempts to
polish Islam’s image and make it more attractive to prospective converts.
They carefully try to avoid, obscure, and omit mentioning any of the
negative Islamic texts and teachings.

An example of Islamic deception is that Muslim activists always quote the
passages of the Quran from the early part of Mohammed’s ministry while
living in Mecca. These texts are peaceful and exemplify tolerance towards
those that are not followers of Islam. All the while, they are fully aware
that most of these passages were abrogated (cancelled and replaced) by
passages that came after he migrated to Medina. The replacement verses
reflect prejudice, intolerance, and endorse violence upon unbelievers

*In conclusion, it is imperative to understand, that Muslim leaders can use
this loop-hole in their religion, to absolve them from any permanent
commitment. It is also important to know that what Muslim activists say to
spread Islam may not always be the whole truth. When dealing with Muslims,
what they say is not the issue. The real issue is, what they
actually mean in their hearts.*

By Abdullah Al Araby




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYmFkc2duBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTYwMDU2MzA->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOXM5aHJxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNjAwNTYzMA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to