*A Dozen Facts Debunking Global Warming Obama Can't Answer (Despite The Phony China Deal) * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=70cd6ca4ea&e=e1333e4251>
Nov 12, 2014 09:23 am | Jeff Dunetz <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=c053b41555&e=e1333e4251> The news was announced early Wednesday November 12, a pseudo climate agreement between the U.S. and China. Under the deal, the United States would cut its carbon emissions between 26-28% -- from levels established in 2005 -- by 2025. China would peak its carbon emissions no later than 2030 and would also increase the use of non-fossil fuels to 20% by 2030. "As the world's two largest economies, energy consumers and emitters of greenhouse gases, we have a special responsibility to lead the global effort against climate change," Obama said Wednesday. Notice in the deal China doesn't have to start cutting back till 2030 and no cut is outlined just a 20% increase. How could they not agree to that. Their biggest economic competitor has to cut back 25-28% by 2025 and they don't have to even start cutting for another five years. This isn't a deal it's a scam the President can use to sell his executive fiats about climate change. According to *Poltico * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=f4c68c0b75&e=e1333e4251>, the President is about to embark on two years of climate-related executive orders, guaranteed to trash the economy. Does the President really understand what is going on with the climate or is he just promoting the hypothesis because it will result in a worldwide redistribution of income between rich and poor nations? Either way this President is denying the climate facts. For those of you who want to think for themselves rather than simply listen to the scary speeches of the global warming proponents, I have created a list of a dozen facts about global warming, that those those folks making the scary speeches cannot respond. Everything below is a fact and I invite the POTUS and /or his climate friends to respond. But they wont. Instead they will call me names like denier or member of the Flat Earth Society (actually there really is a Flat Earth Society and its *president believes in the global * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=ba364540e1&e=e1333e4251>warming hypothesis so who is the real "flat-earther?) <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=a61fd535e8&e=e1333e4251> 1) Through Halloween of 2014- *The Global Warming Pause has lasted 18 years and one month. *Heartland Institute analyst,* Peter Ferrara, notes* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=c8cf4414cf&e=e1333e4251>“If you look at the record of global temperature data, you will find that the late 20th Century period of global warming actually lasted about 20 years, from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. Before that, the globe was dominated by about 30 years of global cooling, giving rise in the 1970s to media discussions of the return of the Little Ice Age (circa 1450 to 1850), or worse.” So there was thirty years of cooling followed by 20 years of warming and almost 18 years of cooling...and that's what the global warming scare is all about. 2)* Antarctic Sea Ice is at record levels and the Arctic ice cap has seen record growth. <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=b1bf1d061d&e=e1333e4251> *Global sea ice area has been averaging above normal for the past two years. But to get around those facts, the global warming enthusiasts are claiming that global warming cause*s global cooling (really). * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=1eac4ab636&e=e1333e4251> 3) *Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant* it's what you exhale and it is what "feeds" plants. Without CO2 there would not be a single blade of grass or a redwood tree, nor would there be the animal life that depends on vegetation; wheat and rice, for example, as food. Without CO2 mankind would get pretty hungry. Even worse the global warming proponants keep talking about population control because they don't want more people around to exhale, and let's not talk about what they say about stopping methane (no spicy foods, no cows, no fart jokes). 4) *There is not ONE climate computer model that has accurately connected CO2 to climate change. *In fact CO2 is at its highest levels in 13,000 years and the earth hasn't warmed in almost 18 years. Approximately* 12,750 years ago before big cars and coal plants* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=57bf2445f1&e=e1333e4251> CO2 levels were higher than today. And during some past ice ages levels were up to 20x today's levels. 5)* Even with the relatively high levels there is very little CO2 in the atmosphere. *At 78% nitrogen is the most abundant gas in the Earth’s atmosphere. Oxygen is the second most abundant gas-of-life in the atmosphere at 21%. Water vapor is the third most abundant gas-of-life in the atmosphere; it varies up to 5%. Exhale freely because carbon dioxide is the least abundant gas in the atmosphere at 0.04%. <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=1a3ce30656&e=e1333e4251> 6) *The climate models pushed by the global warming enthusiasts haven't been right*. Think about that one for a second. If you believe what people like Al Gore the polar ice caps should have melted by now *(actually by last year* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=54202d5804&e=e1333e4251>), most coastal cities should be underwater and it should be a lot warmer by now. As my Mom always said, Man plans and God laughs. The Earth's climate is a very complicated system and the scientists haven't been able to account for all the components to create an accurate model. 7) *You are more likely to see the tooth fairy or a unicorn than a 97% consensus of scientists <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=46c2ef9f3b&e=e1333e4251>believing that there is man-made global warming. *The number is a convenient fraud. *Investigative journalists at Popular Technology reported * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=379b0cb019&e=e1333e4251>the 97% Study falsely classifies scientists' papers, according to the scientists that published them. A more extensive examination of the Cook study reported that out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That is less than 0.97%. How did they come up with 97%? Well out of all the scientists who had a definite opinion, 97% agreed there was global warming and it was *the fault of mankind.* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=e0b36d6654&e=e1333e4251> And how did the Cook folks determine which scientists believed what? They didn't ask, they read papers written by these scientists and came up with their own opinion. 8) *I changed my mind*...this past February, *Patrick Moore, a Canadian ecologist, and the co-founder of Greenpeace, <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=74e060b5f7&e=e1333e4251>*the militant environmental group told members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee “There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years.” There are more like Moore. 9)* Back to Ice Age-- predictions <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=46cb1a8d50&e=e1333e4251>.* When I took Earth Science in college 38 years ago, the professor explained that the scientific consensus was we are heading toward an ice age. That was just before text books were changed to discuss global warming. That was followed by calling it climate change. Now many scientists claim there is new evidence that the Earth may be heading toward an ice age (please stop crying Mr. Gore). 10) *Droughts have not increased. *It is misleading and just plain incorrect to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally,” Professor Roger Pielke Jr. said in his* testimony * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=8aa66cc46a&e=e1333e4251>before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. In May of 2014 Professor Pielke* published a graph* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=9d9165ef80&e=e1333e4251> that shows the intensity of the planet's droughts from 1982 to 2012. The graph shows that neither droughts nor their intensity have seen a growth trend during that 30-year period. 11) *Polar Bears are alive and well and not dying out.* In the Fall 2014 issue of *RANGE Magazine* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=94a9092bbb&e=e1333e4251> Dr. Susan Crockford wrote, “In a recent TV ad campaign, the Center for Biological Diversity said, “global warming is pushing polar bears to the absolute brink.” Results of recent research show this to be a lie – fat, healthy bears like this one from near Barrow, Alaska, are still common and many of the assumptions used by computer models to predict future disasters have turned out to be wrong.” In case you were wondering, *walruses are doing fine * <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=9a2529a9f9&e=e1333e4251> also. 12) *No Increase In Hurricanes: *A study published in the *July 2012* <http://jeffdunetz.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9a443c8dc3ed9a1571202cde1&id=acad6ff963&e=e1333e4251> Journal of the American Meteorological Society concluded unequivocally there is no trend of stronger or more frequent storms, asserting: We have identified considerable inter-annual variability in the frequency of global hurricane landfalls, but within the resolution of the available data, our evidence does not support the presence of significant long-period global or individual basin linear trends for minor, major, or total hurricanes within the period(s) covered by the available quality data. Actually to be honest global warming is man-made. While the Earth isn't warming an the theory and the scare about global warming is entirely man-made. Please email me at [email protected] to be put onto my mailing list. Feel free to reproduce any article but please link back to http://www.jeffdunetz.com __._,_.___ ------------------------------ Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]> ------------------------------ Visit Your Group <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNzFxczg0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTYwMDYyNTQ-> [image: Yahoo! Groups] <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcDNyZjQwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNjAwNjI1NA--> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> __,_._,___ -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
