*http://tinyurl.com/le4bxwk <http://tinyurl.com/le4bxwk>*



November 27, 2014

*When The Enemy of The States is The State*

*Diana West*

*11/26/2014 3:49:00 PM - Diana West*

When St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert P. McCulloch explained that some
exonerating testimony in the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson,
Missouri, came from several African-American eyewitnesses who described
Brown as having charged police officer Darren Wilson before he fired the
fatal shots, it was a powerful moment.

Such testimony was consistent with physical evidence establishing that
Wilson had not fired at Brown's back as repeatedly and poisonously alleged.
Indeed, it would seem that the aggressor in this fatal encounter was not
Wilson, but rather Brown. According to evidence the grand jury sifted and
assessed, it seems that Wilson fired not in cold blood, as so often
declared, but in self-defense.

It was this right to self-defense -- "even" for a policeman -- that the
grand jury decision left sacrosanct when it determined there was simply not
sufficient evidence to indict Wilson for any crime.

Shocking as it may seem, self-defense is not a bedrock right in some courts
-- specifically, U.S. military courts, where U.S. soldiers have seen their
right to self-defense on the battlefield negated by murder convictions.

The St Louis County prosecutor has now uploaded the grand jury proceedings
(all 24 volumes), assorted evidence and witness interviews so all can see
how the system worked, and how the grand jury came to its conclusion. This
sets an unprecedented standard for transparency in the face of ongoing
demagogic efforts to obscure or ignore these same facts. With incendiary
talk of anger "rooted in reality," as the president put it, the need for
protests, the specter of federal charges and "change," Barack Obama and an
army of "racial arsonists" agitate not for justice, not for peace, but for
power.

Listening to McCulloch's discussion of how it was that an unarmed, but
powerfully built 18-year-old (who had a large dose of THC, the
judgment-impairing chemical in marijuana, coursing through his blood) posed
a threat to an armed policeman, I couldn't help but think about another
case. When former Army Ranger Lt. Michael Behenna shot and killed an
unarmed Iraqi terrorist named Ali Mansur in 2008, Behenna, too, claimed to
have acted in self-defense when the Iraqi rushed him. Physical evidence
supported Behenna's version of events, but he was convicted and originally
sentenced to 25 years for murder. When the highest military appeals court
affirmed his conviction, it determined that in the circumstances, Behenna
had "lost the right to act in self-defense and did not regain it."
Sickening.

Think of it. The military appeals court ruling tells us that justice would
really have been better served had Behenna been killed in the altercation.
I can't help thinking the agitators in the Brown case, from Obama on down,
feel exactly the same way about Darren Wilson. To them, self-sacrifice
(someone else's) is preferable to self-defense.

Earlier this year, an act of clemency released Behenna from the military
prison at Ft. Leavenworth but not before he had served five years behind
bars -- for what? Surviving? The legal travesty of the Behenna case is
unlikely to have occurred in civilian court, which is one excellent reason
why such cases should be removed from military jurisdiction.

There are others. More U.S. soldiers remain behind bars whose main crime
seems to be that they, too, remained alive after a do-or-die point of
crisis. There is Sgt. Derrick Miller, whose fatal struggle with an Afghan
inside the defensive perimeter over Miller's own gun, earned Miller a
premeditated murder conviction -- and a sentence of life in prison without
possibility of parole for 10 years. Miller, by the way, is an
African-American who fails to rate the president's "community of color"
concerns, which tells me they are so much smoke to fire up the mob.

There is 1st Lt. Clint Lorance, currently serving a 20-year sentence on two
murder convictions, having ordered his men to shoot at three Afghans
approaching their checkpoint in Taliban territory. There is also Master
Sgt. John Hatley, convicted of the murders of four detainees in Iraq in
harrowing conditions. Not only were the bodies never recovered, the
deceased were never reported missing. Hatley, however, is serving 40 years
in Leavenworth. There is Pfc. Corey Clagett (18 years for following orders
to kill from scot-free commanders), whose inhumane abuse at the hands of
military wardens is an egregious travesty. There is Marine Sgt. Lawrence
Hutchins, whose repeated prosecutions amount to Kafkaesque mental torture.

Surely, these veterans merit the same clemency that has released literally
thousands of enemy fighters with American blood on their hands, from
Guantanamo to Iraq to Afghanistan. Tragically, Uncle Sam doesn't agree.

And this is where a disturbing pattern takes shape. The Obama
administration at these fateful junctures is consistently and predictably
callous or hostile to those who have protected it from our worst enemies
abroad or maintained the peace at home. Did you hear even a word from
Washington about the two sheriff's deputies gunned down in California last
month by a twice-deported illegal alien? No, you heard amnesty instead.

By now, it's hard not to notice that these are the Americans in various
uniforms who support the edifice of law and order, even world order, that
the Obama-ites are committed to dismantling. This would seem to explain the
many cases where Obama administration sympathies, or even benefits of the
doubt, unduly extend to the other side, whatever form it takes, from
terrorists to mobs.

As usual, this leaves the rest of us in serious trouble.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcmlmcm9hBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTcxMjA5OTk->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYjVrZGlwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNzEyMDk5OQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to