*Hillary’s Bad Politics and Worse Ideas*

Posted By *Bruce Thornton* On December 10, 2014

Once again Hillary Clinton has given the Republicans some suicidal
soundbites they should stash away for 2016 in the likely event she is the
Democratic candidate for president. A review of some of her recent
statements reveals that Clinton is not just entitled, money-grubbing,
unlikeable, unpleasant, and unaccomplished. Nor do they just show that she
is a political dunce who has obviously learned nothing from her politically
brilliant husband. More seriously, they expose her commitment to failed
ideas and dangerous delusions.

First there was the “What difference at this point does it make!” she
practically shrieked to Senator Ron Johnson during a January 2013 hearing
on the Benghazi debacle that unfolded on September 11, 2012. Clinton had
told the grieving parents of the victims during the transfer of remains
ceremony at Andrews Air Force base that they died because of “an awful
Internet video that we had nothing to do with.” Four Americans, including
an ambassador, had been murdered on her watch, but she refused to explain
to the Senate why she blamed the hapless maker of a YouTube video, who
spent a year in jail.

This evasion is significant, for within hours of the attack it was clear
that it had been a carefully coordinated, well-planned assault, not the
spontaneous reaction to a video. Soon it also became known that ambassador
Stevens had repeatedly requested increased security, but had been denied by
officials in the State and Defense Departments. As Secretary of State,
Clinton was ultimately responsible for those decisions made by State, as
well as for the astonishing failure to notice the escalating violence in
the months before the attacks, or the significance of the anniversary of
9/11, or the immediate evidence that the attack was not a spontaneous
reaction to a video that had been on YouTube for weeks.

But in her response to all this evidence of negligence and post facto
political spin, all she could do was indignantly declare that all these
failures were irrelevant. In 2016, this footage of the arm-waving, shrill
Clinton transparently trying to misdirect the Senators and the citizens
from her patent incompetence should be played and replayed in political ads.

Next came the more recent revelation of her embarrassing economic
ignorance, shameless pandering to her left-wing base. At a campaign event
in October, attended also by lefty heartthrob Elizabeth Warren, Clinton
lectured, “Don’t let anybody, don’t let anybody tell you that, ah, you
know, it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs. You know that old
theory, trickle-down economics. That has been tried, that has failed. It
has failed rather spectacularly.”

Somehow Clinton missed the 1980s, when economic and tax policies that
encouraged business investment led to spectacular growth. As the Laffer
Center explains <http://www.laffercenter.com/supply-side-economics/>,

“According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1982-1999 was one
continuous mega-economic expansion.  In fact, as it stretched into 2007,
this 25 Year Boom saw a tripling in the net wealth of U.S. households and
businesses from $20 trillion in 1981 to $60 trillion by 2007.  When
adjusted for inflation, more wealth was created in this 25-year boom than
in the previous 200 years. This sustained economic growth is not only
impressive on its own, but even more astonishing as it compares to the
period immediately preceding it.  In the 10 years from 1972-1982,
recessions were deep and recoveries were short.  In fact, throughout
American history, the nation’s economy has been in recession or depression
roughly one-third of the time.  But from 1981-2005, the annual growth rate
of real gross domestic product (GDP) in the U.S. was 3.4 percent per year,
and 3.8 percent per year during the 1983-1989 Reagan expansion alone.”

Compare that to the performance of Obama’s economic policies over the last
6 years, when intrusive regulatory regimes like Dodd-Frank and a runaway
EPA, Obamacare’s highjacking of the health-care industry, the
trillion-dollar stimulus squandered on crony socialist projects like “green
energy,” and the anti-business rhetoric of Obama’s “you didn’t build that,”
have all led to sluggish economic growth
<http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-economic-record-the-worst-five-years-since-world-war-ii/>,
metastasizing debt, declining income for the middle class, an explosion in
entitlement spending, and nearly 20 million unemployed and under-employed.

Contrary to Clinton’s Keynesian superstitions and dirigiste magical
thinking, what has “failed spectacularly” has been progressive economic
policies that think parasitic politicians and unaccountable government
bureaucrats can manage a complex, dynamic economic system
<http://townhall.com/columnists/peterferrara/2012/11/16/its_economic_growth_not_redistribution_that_lifts_everyone_including_the_poor>
better than a free market that incentivizes people to actually build
businesses that create jobs and increase wealth. And just as spectacularly
incompetent is Hillary’s political tin ear that lets her make such a
statement just to curry favor with a narrow base of anti-capitalist
fundamentalists, when she surely must know that come the 2016 presidential
election, those words will be pinned to the Obama albatross sure to be
hanging around her neck.

Finally, there is the bizarre statement at Georgetown last week about
improving our foreign policy with what she called “smart power”:  “Using
every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security. Leaving no
one on the sidelines. Showing respect even for one’s enemies. Trying to
understand, in so far as psychologically possible, empathize with their
perspective and point of view. Helping to define the problems, determine
the solutions.” She then added a banal cliché of modern feminism,
suggesting that the lack of women negotiators and signatories was
responsible for the failure of many peace treaties. After all, women are
naturally more empathetic and sensitive to others’ “point of view,” one of
those Victorian stereotypes that feminists used to tell us were sexist
insults.

These comments embody everything that is wrong with a modern foreign policy
based on Kantian delusions about a global “harmony of interests,” the
notion that all peoples are just like us and want all the same goods such
as peace, prosperity, political freedom, and respect for human rights. If
they behave differently, it’s because they just don’t know these goods are
in their best interests, or they have been traumatized by history,
particularly the depredations of Western colonialism, imperialism, and
capitalist exploitation, which are the causes of their violent aggression
and brutality. Thus if we “understand” and “empathize” with the roots of
our enemies’ behavior, they will see the light and abandon aggression and
tyranny.

This is the same delusion that Obama based his foreign policy on, as
evidenced by his infamous “apology tour,” on which he donned the hair shirt
of Western sin and groveled before foreign audiences. It’s the application
to foreign affairs of the two-bit psychologizing that dominates the public
schools, where boosting self-esteem and “empathizing” with punks and
bullies are the favored mechanisms for teaching and civilizing young
people. It utterly lacks any understanding of the tragic constants of human
nature and the wisdom accumulated by the human race since the ancient
Greeks and Hebrews––that, as Machiavelli said, “all men are bad and that
they will use their malignity of mind every time they have the opportunity.”

For all her alleged foreign policy toughness, Clinton’s philosophy embodies
the bad utopian ideals that have enabled much of the disorder afflicting
the world since their spectacular failure in preventing World War I. We
hear the same delusions in the words of Neville Chamberlain after Hitler’s
*Anschluss* of Austria in March 1938, when he told the House of Commons,
“We should take any and every opportunity to try to remove any genuine and
legitimate grievance that may exist,” and then imagined telling Hitler,
“The best thing you can do is to tell us exactly what you want for your
Sudeten Deutsch.” Such blind “empathy” and “understanding” and “respect”
for Germany’s “grievances,” of course, in 6 months culminated in the
debacle of Munich and the devastating sequel of World War II.

Contrary to Clinton and Obama, enemies like Vladimir Putin, ISIS, Bashar al
Assad, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, the Ayatollah Khamenei, and Xi Jinping
are not the global village’s wayward teenagers “acting out” because they
don’t know their own best interests and suffer from insufficient
self-esteem and “respect.” They are hard, brutal men, vicious and ruthless,
who know exactly what they want, and who possess beliefs alien to Western
ideals like liberal democracy, human rights, tolerance, and a preference
for diplomatic words and “mutual understanding and respect.” In their
“perspective” and “point of view,” violence is a tool of international
relations, and a legitimate instrument for achieving their aims and
interests. And they have nothing but contempt for our schoolmarmish empathy
and respect, which they correctly interpret as civilizational weakness and
a failure of morale. All they respect is force. That’s the most important
truth we need to “understand.”

These 3 statements reveal political beliefs and character flaws that should
automatically disqualify Hillary Clinton from being president. And even if
we attribute them to rank ambition and venal opportunism rather than
sincere belief, their sheer political stupidity and lack of prudence
bespeak a mind and character unfit for leading the most powerful country on
the planet.

*Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: **Click here*
<http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=david+horowitz&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&qid=1316459840&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&sort=daterank>*.
*

*Subscribe*
<http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&id=c761755bdf>*
to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and **LIKE*
<https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang>* it on **Facebook.*
<https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang>
------------------------------

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: *http://www.frontpagemag.com
<http://www.frontpagemag.com>*

URL to article:
*http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/bruce-thornton/hillarys-bad-politics-and-worse-ideas/
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/bruce-thornton/hillarys-bad-politics-and-worse-ideas/>*




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNXJ0M2JnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTgyNTYzODc->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcWgxdHN2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxODI1NjM4Nw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to